PICB vs. RSP

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PICB (Invesco International Corporate Bond ETF) and RSP (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PICB is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the S&P International Corporate Bond Index, while RSP is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Equal Weight Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PICB returned 0.71%/yr vs 11.86%/yr for RSP. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PICB charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for RSP.

Performance

PICB vs. RSP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco International Corporate Bond ETF (PICB) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PICB achieves a -0.61% return, which is significantly lower than RSP's 9.70% return. Over the past 10 years, PICB has underperformed RSP with an annualized return of 0.71%, while RSP has yielded a comparatively higher 11.86% annualized return.

PICB

• 1D: -0.64%
• 1M: 0.07%
• YTD: -0.61%
• 6M: 0.09%
• 1Y: 2.99%
• 3Y*: 6.15%
• 5Y*: -2.27%
• 10Y*: 0.71%

RSP

• 1D: -0.38%
• 1M: 3.77%
• YTD: 9.70%
• 6M: 10.18%
• 1Y: 19.50%
• 3Y*: 15.23%
• 5Y*: 8.33%
• 10Y*: 11.86%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PICB vs. RSP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PICB Invesco International Corporate Bond ETF	-0.61%	14.33%	-3.45%	11.56%	-22.64%	-6.87%	12.87%	9.40%	-7.27%	14.43%
RSP Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF	9.70%	11.21%	12.79%	13.70%	-11.62%	29.41%	12.66%	28.91%	-7.84%	18.52%

Correlation

The correlation between PICB and RSP is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.42
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.39
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.42
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.28
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2010	0.24

The correlation between PICB and RSP shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (all time) to 0.42 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PICB vs. RSP - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PICB	RSP
Financial Services	29.9%	14.5%
Communication Services	5.4%	3.7%
Industrials	4.7%	14.1%
Utilities	4.6%	6.1%
Healthcare	3.3%	11.0%
Consumer Cyclical	3.2%	9.9%
Energy	2.8%	4.5%
Consumer Defensive	2.2%	6.5%
Technology	1.0%	19.6%
Real Estate	0.8%	6.0%
Basic Materials	0.1%	4.1%

Return for Risk

PICB vs. RSP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PICB

PICB Risk / Return Rank: 14
PICB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
PICB Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
PICB Omega Ratio Rank: 13
PICB Calmar Ratio Rank: 15
PICB Martin Ratio Rank: 15

RSP

RSP Risk / Return Rank: 49
RSP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
RSP Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
RSP Omega Ratio Rank: 46
RSP Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
RSP Martin Ratio Rank: 54

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PICB vs. RSP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco International Corporate Bond ETF (PICB) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PICB	RSP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.38	1.70	-1.31
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.61	2.47	-1.86
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.07	1.30	-0.23
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.47	2.49	-2.03
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.30	9.48	-8.17
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PICB vs. RSP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PICB Sharpe Ratio is 0.38, which is lower than the RSP Sharpe Ratio of 1.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PICB and RSP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PICB	RSP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.38	1.70	-1.31
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.22	0.52	-0.74
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.07	0.65	-0.58
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.21	0.57	-0.36

Drawdowns

PICB vs. RSP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PICB drawdown since its inception was -37.10%, smaller than the maximum RSP drawdown of -59.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PICB and RSP.

Drawdown Indicators

	PICB	RSP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-37.10%	-59.92%	+22.82%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.41%	-7.85%	+1.44%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-9.76%	-17.81%	+8.05%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-36.51%	-21.38%	-15.13%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-37.10%	-39.04%	+1.94%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.81%	-0.38%	-11.43%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.67%	-6.65%	-3.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.30%	2.06%	+0.24%

Volatility

PICB vs. RSP - Volatility Comparison

Invesco International Corporate Bond ETF (PICB) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP) have volatilities of 2.56% and 2.56%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PICB	RSP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.56%	2.56%	0.00%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.00%	8.29%	-2.29%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.81%	11.56%	-3.75%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.19%	16.18%	-5.99%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.06%	18.35%	-8.29%

PICB vs. RSP - Expense Ratio Comparison

PICB has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than RSP's 0.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

PICB vs. RSP - Dividend Comparison

PICB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.34%, more than RSP's 1.49% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PICB Invesco International Corporate Bond ETF	3.34%	3.17%	3.19%	2.24%	1.64%	1.34%	1.22%	1.42%	1.70%	1.47%	2.20%	2.39%
RSP Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF	1.49%	1.64%	1.52%	1.64%	1.82%	1.28%	1.64%	1.69%	2.02%	1.52%	1.20%	1.70%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PICB and RSP in my portfolio?

PICB and RSP have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PICB or RSP?

RSP has higher volatility (2.56%) compared to PICB (2.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PICB dropped -37.10% vs RSP's -59.92%.

Which ETF is better, PICB or RSP?

On 10-year performance, RSP leads with 11.86% vs 0.71% for PICB. On fees, RSP is cheaper at 0.20% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PICB or RSP?

Over the 10-year period, RSP has performed better with a 11.86% return vs 0.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PICB or RSP?

RSP is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for PICB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PICB or RSP?

PICB has the higher dividend yield at 3.34%, compared with 1.49% for RSP.

What is the main difference between PICB and RSP?

PICB is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while RSP is S&P 500. PICB tracks S&P International Corporate Bond Index, while RSP tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Index. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for PICB and 0.20% for RSP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RSP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.70 vs 0.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.