PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PHYL vs. USHY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PHYL vs. USHY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Active High Yield Bond ETF (PHYL) and iShares Broad USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (USHY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PHYL achieves a 1.53% return, which is significantly lower than USHY's 1.64% return.


PHYL

1D
0.17%
1M
0.33%
YTD
1.53%
6M
2.10%
1Y
7.43%
3Y*
9.20%
5Y*
4.04%
10Y*

USHY

1D
0.22%
1M
0.46%
YTD
1.64%
6M
1.98%
1Y
6.99%
3Y*
9.01%
5Y*
4.29%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PHYL vs. USHY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
PHYL
PGIM Active High Yield Bond ETF
1.53%9.65%8.45%11.91%-11.80%6.20%6.31%16.77%-4.15%
USHY
iShares Broad USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
1.64%8.81%8.45%12.73%-11.18%5.02%6.17%14.24%-4.21%

Correlation

The correlation between PHYL and USHY is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2018

0.81

The correlation between PHYL and USHY shifts across timeframes, from 0.81 (all time) to 0.92 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PHYL vs. USHY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PHYL
PHYL Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
PHYL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PHYL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
PHYL Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
PHYL Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
PHYL Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

USHY
USHY Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
USHY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USHY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
USHY Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
USHY Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
USHY Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PHYL vs. USHY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Active High Yield Bond ETF (PHYL) and iShares Broad USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (USHY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PHYLUSHYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.37

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.79

2.89

-0.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.75

12.99

-0.23

PHYL vs. USHY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PHYL Sharpe Ratio is 2.30, which is comparable to the USHY Sharpe Ratio of 1.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PHYL and USHY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PHYLUSHYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.30

1.93

+0.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

0.59

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.72

0.58

+0.14

Drawdowns

PHYL vs. USHY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PHYL drawdown since its inception was -22.07%, roughly equal to the maximum USHY drawdown of -22.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PHYL and USHY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PHYLUSHYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.07%

-22.44%

+0.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.68%

-2.43%

-0.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.53%

-4.66%

+0.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.11%

-15.56%

-0.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.13%

-0.06%

-0.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.06%

-2.66%

-0.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.58%

0.54%

+0.04%

Volatility

PHYL vs. USHY - Volatility Comparison

PGIM Active High Yield Bond ETF (PHYL) and iShares Broad USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (USHY) have volatilities of 1.09% and 1.14%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PHYLUSHYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.09%

1.14%

-0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.59%

2.92%

-0.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.25%

3.65%

-0.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.68%

7.34%

-1.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.66%

8.25%

-0.59%

PHYL vs. USHY - Expense Ratio Comparison

PHYL has a 0.53% expense ratio, which is higher than USHY's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

PHYL vs. USHY - Dividend Comparison

PHYL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.99%, more than USHY's 6.91% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
PHYL
PGIM Active High Yield Bond ETF
6.99%7.05%8.28%7.62%6.55%6.13%7.51%7.31%1.79%0.00%
USHY
iShares Broad USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
6.91%6.79%6.89%6.63%6.08%5.07%5.30%5.92%6.30%0.73%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, PHYL and USHY move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

USHY has higher volatility (1.14%) compared to PHYL (1.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PHYL dropped -22.07% vs USHY's -22.44%.

On 5-year performance, USHY leads with 4.29% vs 4.04% for PHYL. On fees, USHY is cheaper at 0.15% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, USHY has performed better with a 4.29% return vs 4.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

USHY is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.53% for PHYL.

PHYL has the higher dividend yield at 6.99%, compared with 6.91% for USHY.

They also come from different issuers: Prudential and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.53% for PHYL and 0.15% for USHY.

PHYL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 1.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PHYL and USHY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer