PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PHYL vs. JPIE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PHYL vs. JPIE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Active High Yield Bond ETF (PHYL) and JPMorgan Income ETF (JPIE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with PHYL having a 1.53% return and JPIE slightly lower at 1.51%.


PHYL

1D
0.17%
1M
0.33%
YTD
1.53%
6M
2.10%
1Y
7.43%
3Y*
9.20%
5Y*
4.04%
10Y*

JPIE

1D
0.09%
1M
0.39%
YTD
1.51%
6M
1.98%
1Y
5.83%
3Y*
6.55%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PHYL vs. JPIE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
PHYL
PGIM Active High Yield Bond ETF
1.53%9.65%8.45%11.91%-11.80%1.04%
JPIE
JPMorgan Income ETF
1.51%7.39%6.32%7.07%-6.13%0.30%

Correlation

The correlation between PHYL and JPIE is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2021

0.73

The correlation between PHYL and JPIE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PHYL vs. JPIE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PHYL
PHYL Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
PHYL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PHYL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
PHYL Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
PHYL Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
PHYL Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

JPIE
JPIE Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
JPIE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JPIE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
JPIE Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
JPIE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
JPIE Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PHYL vs. JPIE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Active High Yield Bond ETF (PHYL) and JPMorgan Income ETF (JPIE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PHYLJPIEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.83

-0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.79

5.10

-2.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.75

25.31

-12.56

PHYL vs. JPIE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PHYL Sharpe Ratio is 2.30, which is lower than the JPIE Sharpe Ratio of 3.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PHYL and JPIE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PHYLJPIEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.30

3.69

-1.39

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.72

0.99

-0.27

Drawdowns

PHYL vs. JPIE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PHYL drawdown since its inception was -22.07%, which is greater than JPIE's maximum drawdown of -9.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PHYL and JPIE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PHYLJPIEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.07%

-9.96%

-12.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.68%

-1.15%

-1.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.53%

-2.40%

-2.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.13%

-0.04%

-0.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.06%

-2.09%

-0.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.58%

0.23%

+0.35%

Volatility

PHYL vs. JPIE - Volatility Comparison

PGIM Active High Yield Bond ETF (PHYL) has a higher volatility of 1.09% compared to JPMorgan Income ETF (JPIE) at 0.61%. This indicates that PHYL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JPIE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PHYLJPIEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.09%

0.61%

+0.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.59%

1.28%

+1.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.25%

1.59%

+1.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.68%

3.52%

+2.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.66%

3.52%

+4.14%

PHYL vs. JPIE - Expense Ratio Comparison

PHYL has a 0.53% expense ratio, which is higher than JPIE's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

PHYL vs. JPIE - Dividend Comparison

PHYL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.99%, more than JPIE's 5.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
JPIE
JPMorgan Income ETF
5.62%5.65%6.11%5.70%4.49%0.63%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PHYL
PGIM Active High Yield Bond ETF
6.99%7.05%8.28%7.62%6.55%6.13%7.51%7.31%1.79%

Frequently Asked Questions


PHYL and JPIE have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PHYL has higher volatility (1.09%) compared to JPIE (0.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PHYL dropped -22.07% vs JPIE's -9.96%.

On 3-year performance, PHYL leads with 9.20% vs 6.55% for JPIE. On fees, JPIE is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, JPIE has been the lower-risk option at 0.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, PHYL has performed better with a 9.20% return vs 6.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JPIE is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.53% for PHYL.

PHYL has the higher dividend yield at 6.99%, compared with 5.62% for JPIE.

PHYL is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while JPIE is Multisector Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Prudential and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.53% for PHYL and 0.40% for JPIE.

JPIE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.69 vs 2.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PHYL and JPIE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer