PHYL vs. DADS
PHYL (PGIM Active High Yield Bond ETF) and DADS (Digital Asset Debt Strategy ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PHYL charges 0.53%/yr vs 1.04%/yr for DADS.
Performance
PHYL vs. DADS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PHYL achieves a 1.53% return, which is significantly lower than DADS's 14.38% return.
PHYL
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- 0.33%
- YTD
- 1.53%
- 6M
- 2.10%
- 1Y
- 7.43%
- 3Y*
- 9.20%
- 5Y*
- 4.04%
- 10Y*
- —
DADS
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 2.96%
- YTD
- 14.38%
- 6M
- 9.23%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PHYL vs. DADS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PHYL PGIM Active High Yield Bond ETF | 1.53% | 3.16% |
DADS Digital Asset Debt Strategy ETF | 14.38% | -3.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between PHYL and DADS is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 6, 2025 | 0.51 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PHYL vs. DADS — Risk / Return Rank
PHYL
DADS
PHYL vs. DADS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Active High Yield Bond ETF (PHYL) and Digital Asset Debt Strategy ETF (DADS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PHYL | DADS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.79 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.75 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PHYL | DADS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.30 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.72 | 0.73 | -0.01 |
Drawdowns
PHYL vs. DADS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PHYL drawdown since its inception was -22.07%, which is greater than DADS's maximum drawdown of -17.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PHYL and DADS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PHYL | DADS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.07% | -17.07% | -5.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.68% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.53% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.11% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.13% | -2.77% | +2.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.06% | -7.61% | +4.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.58% | — | — |
Volatility
PHYL vs. DADS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PHYL | DADS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.09% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.59% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.25% | 17.54% | -14.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.68% | 17.54% | -11.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.66% | 17.54% | -9.88% |
PHYL vs. DADS - Expense Ratio Comparison
PHYL has a 0.53% expense ratio, which is lower than DADS's 1.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
PHYL vs. DADS - Dividend Comparison
PHYL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.99%, more than DADS's 2.76% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DADS Digital Asset Debt Strategy ETF | 2.76% | 1.83% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PHYL PGIM Active High Yield Bond ETF | 6.99% | 7.05% | 8.28% | 7.62% | 6.55% | 6.13% | 7.51% | 7.31% | 1.79% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PHYL and DADS have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PHYL is cheaper at 0.53% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PHYL is cheaper with a 0.53% expense ratio, compared with 1.04% for DADS.
PHYL has the higher dividend yield at 6.99%, compared with 2.76% for DADS.
They also come from different issuers: Prudential and Alphabit. Their fees differ too: 0.53% for PHYL and 1.04% for DADS.
Find the right allocation for PHYL and DADS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer