PHTYX vs. PLTHX
PHTYX (Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2045 Fund) and PLTHX (Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2060 Fund) are both Target Retirement Date funds from Principal. Over the past 10 years, PHTYX returned 11.21%/yr vs 12.03%/yr for PLTHX. With a 1.00 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. Both charge a 0.05% expense ratio.
Performance
PHTYX vs. PLTHX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PHTYX achieves a 10.01% return, which is significantly lower than PLTHX's 11.14% return. Over the past 10 years, PHTYX has underperformed PLTHX with an annualized return of 11.21%, while PLTHX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.03% annualized return.
PHTYX
- 1D
- 0.58%
- 1M
- 4.14%
- YTD
- 10.01%
- 6M
- 10.88%
- 1Y
- 25.44%
- 3Y*
- 18.38%
- 5Y*
- 9.48%
- 10Y*
- 11.21%
PLTHX
- 1D
- 0.65%
- 1M
- 4.64%
- YTD
- 11.14%
- 6M
- 12.17%
- 1Y
- 27.91%
- 3Y*
- 19.78%
- 5Y*
- 10.34%
- 10Y*
- 12.03%
PHTYX vs. PLTHX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PHTYX Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2045 Fund | 10.01% | 18.54% | 16.13% | 19.35% | -18.26% | 18.37% | 15.78% | 24.79% | -9.07% | 19.81% |
PLTHX Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2060 Fund | 11.14% | 19.91% | 17.18% | 20.28% | -18.52% | 20.05% | 16.11% | 26.46% | -9.93% | 21.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between PHTYX and PLTHX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2014 | 1.00 |
The correlation between PHTYX and PLTHX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 1.00 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PHTYX vs. PLTHX — Risk / Return Rank
PHTYX
PLTHX
PHTYX vs. PLTHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2045 Fund (PHTYX) and Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2060 Fund (PLTHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PHTYX | PLTHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.40 | 2.41 | -0.01 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.35 | 3.34 | +0.01 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.44 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.26 | 3.30 | -0.04 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.94 | 15.15 | -0.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PHTYX | PLTHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.40 | 2.41 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 | 0.67 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.76 | 0.76 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.69 | 0.69 | 0.00 |
Drawdowns
PHTYX vs. PLTHX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PHTYX drawdown since its inception was -30.61%, smaller than the maximum PLTHX drawdown of -33.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PHTYX and PLTHX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PHTYX | PLTHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.61% | -33.26% | +2.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.95% | -8.60% | +0.65% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.25% | -16.64% | +1.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.94% | -25.49% | +0.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.61% | -33.26% | +2.65% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.57% | -4.81% | +0.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.73% | 1.87% | -0.14% |
Volatility
PHTYX vs. PLTHX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2045 Fund (PHTYX) is 3.20%, while Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2060 Fund (PLTHX) has a volatility of 3.42%. This indicates that PHTYX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PLTHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PHTYX | PLTHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.20% | 3.42% | -0.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.68% | 9.46% | -0.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.92% | 11.95% | -1.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.56% | 15.50% | -0.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.81% | 15.97% | -1.16% |
PHTYX vs. PLTHX - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both PHTYX and PLTHX have an expense ratio of 0.05%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
PHTYX vs. PLTHX - Dividend Comparison
PHTYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.49%, more than PLTHX's 3.93% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PHTYX Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2045 Fund | 4.49% | 4.94% | 4.41% | 3.05% | 9.68% | 4.72% | 3.45% | 3.63% | 4.66% | 2.24% | 2.00% | 1.66% |
PLTHX Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2060 Fund | 3.93% | 4.37% | 4.30% | 2.76% | 7.91% | 3.84% | 2.91% | 3.67% | 3.47% | 2.37% | 2.20% | 1.65% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 1.00, PHTYX and PLTHX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
PLTHX has higher volatility (3.42%) compared to PHTYX (3.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PHTYX dropped -30.61% vs PLTHX's -33.26%.
PLTHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 2.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PHTYX and PLTHX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer