PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PHTUX vs. PADLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PHTUX vs. PADLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2050 Fund (PHTUX) and Putnam Retirement Advantage Maturity Fund (PADLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PHTUX achieves a 11.33% return, which is significantly higher than PADLX's 4.88% return.


PHTUX

1D
0.50%
1M
5.33%
YTD
11.33%
6M
11.96%
1Y
27.49%
3Y*
19.78%
5Y*
10.41%
10Y*
11.81%

PADLX

1D
0.17%
1M
2.20%
YTD
4.88%
6M
5.33%
1Y
13.98%
3Y*
10.43%
5Y*
4.13%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PHTUX vs. PADLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
PHTUX
Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2050 Fund
11.33%19.64%17.26%20.30%-18.48%19.08%15.22%
PADLX
Putnam Retirement Advantage Maturity Fund
4.88%10.83%8.34%11.01%-12.54%2.93%7.84%

Correlation

The correlation between PHTUX and PADLX is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2020

0.83

The correlation between PHTUX and PADLX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PHTUX vs. PADLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PHTUX
PHTUX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
PHTUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PHTUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
PHTUX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
PHTUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
PHTUX Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

PADLX
PADLX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
PADLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PADLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
PADLX Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
PADLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
PADLX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PHTUX vs. PADLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2050 Fund (PHTUX) and Putnam Retirement Advantage Maturity Fund (PADLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PHTUXPADLXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.63

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.32

3.92

-0.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.21

17.17

-1.95

PHTUX vs. PADLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PHTUX Sharpe Ratio is 2.40, which is comparable to the PADLX Sharpe Ratio of 3.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PHTUX and PADLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PHTUXPADLXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.40

3.14

-0.74

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

0.62

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.70

0.65

+0.04

Drawdowns

PHTUX vs. PADLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PHTUX drawdown since its inception was -31.76%, which is greater than PADLX's maximum drawdown of -18.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PHTUX and PADLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PHTUXPADLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.76%

-18.87%

-12.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.47%

-3.63%

-4.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.49%

-6.63%

-9.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.50%

-18.87%

-6.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.69%

-4.83%

+0.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.84%

0.83%

+1.01%

Volatility

PHTUX vs. PADLX - Volatility Comparison

Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2050 Fund (PHTUX) has a higher volatility of 3.33% compared to Putnam Retirement Advantage Maturity Fund (PADLX) at 1.57%. This indicates that PHTUX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PADLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PHTUXPADLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.33%

1.57%

+1.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.24%

3.62%

+5.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.72%

4.54%

+7.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.41%

6.65%

+8.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.54%

7.51%

+8.03%

PHTUX vs. PADLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PHTUX has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than PADLX's 0.22% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

PHTUX vs. PADLX - Dividend Comparison

PHTUX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.37%, less than PADLX's 4.94% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PADLX
Putnam Retirement Advantage Maturity Fund
4.94%5.03%3.71%2.91%1.01%1.45%1.66%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PHTUX
Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2050 Fund
4.37%4.86%4.44%2.95%9.50%4.59%3.35%4.08%4.51%2.40%2.44%1.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


PHTUX and PADLX have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PHTUX has higher volatility (3.33%) compared to PADLX (1.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PHTUX dropped -31.76% vs PADLX's -18.87%.

PADLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.14 vs 2.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PHTUX and PADLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer