PHTUX vs. CMNWX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PHTUX (Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2050 Fund) and CMNWX (Principal Capital Appreciation Fund) are both mutual funds - PHTUX is a Target Retirement Date fund managed by Principal, while CMNWX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Principal. Over the past 10 years, PHTUX returned 11.81%/yr vs 15.55%/yr for CMNWX. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. PHTUX charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for CMNWX.

Performance

PHTUX vs. CMNWX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2050 Fund (PHTUX) and Principal Capital Appreciation Fund (CMNWX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with PHTUX having a 11.33% return and CMNWX slightly lower at 10.80%. Over the past 10 years, PHTUX has underperformed CMNWX with an annualized return of 11.81%, while CMNWX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.55% annualized return.

PHTUX

• 1D: 0.50%
• 1M: 5.33%
• YTD: 11.33%
• 6M: 11.96%
• 1Y: 27.49%
• 3Y*: 19.78%
• 5Y*: 10.41%
• 10Y*: 11.81%

CMNWX

• 1D: 0.16%
• 1M: 5.05%
• YTD: 10.80%
• 6M: 10.19%
• 1Y: 25.40%
• 3Y*: 23.41%
• 5Y*: 14.89%
• 10Y*: 15.55%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PHTUX vs. CMNWX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PHTUX Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2050 Fund	11.33%	19.64%	17.26%	20.30%	-18.48%	19.08%	15.94%	25.59%	-9.48%	20.48%
CMNWX Principal Capital Appreciation Fund	10.80%	13.27%	32.14%	25.01%	-16.37%	27.45%	18.36%	32.21%	-4.12%	20.64%

Correlation

The correlation between PHTUX and CMNWX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.93
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.94
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.95
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2014	0.95

The correlation between PHTUX and CMNWX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

PHTUX vs. CMNWX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PHTUX

PHTUX Risk / Return Rank: 69
PHTUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
PHTUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
PHTUX Omega Ratio Rank: 63
PHTUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
PHTUX Martin Ratio Rank: 81

CMNWX

CMNWX Risk / Return Rank: 55
CMNWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
CMNWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
CMNWX Omega Ratio Rank: 46
CMNWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
CMNWX Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PHTUX vs. CMNWX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2050 Fund (PHTUX) and Principal Capital Appreciation Fund (CMNWX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PHTUX	CMNWX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.40	2.11	+0.28
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.32	2.90	+0.42
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	1.37	+0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.32	2.93	+0.39
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.21	13.71	+1.51
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PHTUX vs. CMNWX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PHTUX Sharpe Ratio is 2.40, which is comparable to the CMNWX Sharpe Ratio of 2.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PHTUX and CMNWX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PHTUX	CMNWX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.40	2.11	+0.28
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.68	0.89	-0.21
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.76	0.91	-0.15
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.70	0.72	-0.02

Drawdowns

PHTUX vs. CMNWX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PHTUX drawdown since its inception was -31.76%, smaller than the maximum CMNWX drawdown of -50.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PHTUX and CMNWX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PHTUX	CMNWX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.76%	-50.43%	+18.67%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.47%	-8.91%	+0.44%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.49%	-19.54%	+3.05%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.50%	-23.35%	-2.15%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-31.76%	-33.26%	+1.50%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.69%	-6.95%	+2.26%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.84%	1.90%	-0.06%

Volatility

PHTUX vs. CMNWX - Volatility Comparison

Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2050 Fund (PHTUX) has a higher volatility of 3.33% compared to Principal Capital Appreciation Fund (CMNWX) at 2.85%. This indicates that PHTUX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CMNWX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PHTUX	CMNWX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.33%	2.85%	+0.48%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.24%	9.42%	-0.18%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.72%	12.37%	-0.65%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.41%	16.80%	-1.39%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.54%	17.19%	-1.65%

PHTUX vs. CMNWX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PHTUX has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than CMNWX's 0.80% expense ratio.

Dividends

PHTUX vs. CMNWX - Dividend Comparison

PHTUX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.37%, less than CMNWX's 7.90% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CMNWX Principal Capital Appreciation Fund	7.90%	8.75%	10.03%	0.71%	0.69%	9.52%	5.33%	8.37%	46.60%	7.72%	10.32%	5.42%
PHTUX Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2050 Fund	4.37%	4.86%	4.44%	2.95%	9.50%	4.59%	3.35%	4.08%	4.51%	2.40%	2.44%	1.64%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PHTUX and CMNWX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.93, PHTUX and CMNWX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, PHTUX or CMNWX?

PHTUX has higher volatility (3.33%) compared to CMNWX (2.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PHTUX dropped -31.76% vs CMNWX's -50.43%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PHTUX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs 2.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.