PHTFX vs. FFFAX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

PHTFX (Principal LifeTime Hybrid Income Fund) and FFFAX (Fidelity Freedom Income Fund) are both Target Retirement Date funds. Over the past 10 years, PHTFX returned 5.10%/yr vs 4.52%/yr for FFFAX. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PHTFX charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for FFFAX.

Performance

PHTFX vs. FFFAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal LifeTime Hybrid Income Fund (PHTFX) and Fidelity Freedom Income Fund (FFFAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with PHTFX having a 4.48% return and FFFAX slightly higher at 4.69%. Over the past 10 years, PHTFX has outperformed FFFAX with an annualized return of 5.10%, while FFFAX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.52% annualized return.

PHTFX

• 1D: -0.35%
• 1M: 1.42%
• YTD: 4.48%
• 6M: 4.72%
• 1Y: 12.30%
• 3Y*: 9.70%
• 5Y*: 4.19%
• 10Y*: 5.10%

FFFAX

• 1D: -0.25%
• 1M: 1.12%
• YTD: 4.69%
• 6M: 5.09%
• 1Y: 10.77%
• 3Y*: 7.99%
• 5Y*: 3.14%
• 10Y*: 4.52%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PHTFX vs. FFFAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PHTFX Principal LifeTime Hybrid Income Fund	4.48%	11.14%	7.52%	10.77%	-13.22%	5.13%	10.11%	11.82%	-2.75%	7.62%
FFFAX Fidelity Freedom Income Fund	4.69%	10.42%	4.34%	8.18%	-11.33%	3.12%	8.93%	10.74%	-1.99%	8.21%

Correlation

The correlation between PHTFX and FFFAX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.89
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.88
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.87
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2014	0.87

The correlation between PHTFX and FFFAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

PHTFX vs. FFFAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PHTFX

PHTFX Risk / Return Rank: 73
PHTFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
PHTFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
PHTFX Omega Ratio Rank: 74
PHTFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
PHTFX Martin Ratio Rank: 77

FFFAX

FFFAX Risk / Return Rank: 72
FFFAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
FFFAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
FFFAX Omega Ratio Rank: 76
FFFAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
FFFAX Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PHTFX vs. FFFAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal LifeTime Hybrid Income Fund (PHTFX) and Fidelity Freedom Income Fund (FFFAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PHTFX	FFFAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.39	2.48	-0.09
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.49	3.63	-0.15
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.48	1.50	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.09	3.08	+0.01
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.03	13.55	+0.47
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PHTFX vs. FFFAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PHTFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.39, which is comparable to the FFFAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PHTFX and FFFAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PHTFX	FFFAX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.39	2.48	-0.09
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.62	0.59	+0.03
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.83	0.98	-0.15
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.81	1.05	-0.24

Drawdowns

PHTFX vs. FFFAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PHTFX drawdown since its inception was -17.26%, roughly equal to the maximum FFFAX drawdown of -17.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PHTFX and FFFAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PHTFX	FFFAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.26%	-17.96%	+0.70%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.10%	-3.68%	-0.42%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.04%	-4.91%	-1.13%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.26%	-15.87%	-1.39%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-17.26%	-15.87%	-1.39%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.35%	-0.25%	-0.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.57%	-1.79%	-0.78%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.90%	0.83%	+0.07%

Volatility

PHTFX vs. FFFAX - Volatility Comparison

Principal LifeTime Hybrid Income Fund (PHTFX) and Fidelity Freedom Income Fund (FFFAX) have volatilities of 1.82% and 1.87%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PHTFX	FFFAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.82%	1.87%	-0.05%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.32%	3.85%	+0.47%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.31%	4.57%	+0.74%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.82%	5.37%	+1.45%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.16%	4.64%	+1.52%

PHTFX vs. FFFAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PHTFX has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than FFFAX's 0.47% expense ratio.

Dividends

PHTFX vs. FFFAX - Dividend Comparison

PHTFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.35%, more than FFFAX's 2.98% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FFFAX Fidelity Freedom Income Fund	2.98%	3.29%	3.13%	2.92%	5.89%	6.12%	4.37%	3.65%	5.17%	3.74%	3.21%	3.28%
PHTFX Principal LifeTime Hybrid Income Fund	4.35%	4.54%	3.34%	3.60%	5.20%	5.57%	4.92%	2.96%	2.07%	2.43%	1.41%	1.52%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PHTFX and FFFAX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, PHTFX and FFFAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, PHTFX or FFFAX?

FFFAX has higher volatility (1.87%) compared to PHTFX (1.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PHTFX dropped -17.26% vs FFFAX's -17.96%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FFFAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 2.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.