PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PHSP.L vs. SLB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PHSP.L vs. SLB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in WisdomTree Physical Silver (PHSP.L) and Schlumberger Limited (SLB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

PHSP.L is traded in GBp, while SLB is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SLB values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PHSP.L achieves a -5.51% return, which is significantly lower than SLB's 48.77% return. Over the past 10 years, PHSP.L has outperformed SLB with an annualized return of 14.58%, while SLB has yielded a comparatively lower 0.17% annualized return.


PHSP.L

1D
5.15%
1M
-23.06%
YTD
-5.51%
6M
8.99%
1Y
87.72%
3Y*
38.02%
5Y*
19.89%
10Y*
14.58%

SLB

1D
0.41%
1M
2.87%
YTD
48.77%
6M
43.64%
1Y
64.55%
3Y*
5.94%
5Y*
13.60%
10Y*
0.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PHSP.L vs. SLB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PHSP.L
WisdomTree Physical Silver
-5.51%129.68%22.85%-6.51%15.50%-12.11%40.85%12.57%-3.55%-5.67%
SLB
Schlumberger Limited
48.77%-4.08%-23.15%-5.74%102.69%41.62%-45.46%13.25%-41.38%-24.51%

Correlation

The correlation between PHSP.L and SLB is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.11

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2008

0.11

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PHSP.L vs. SLB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PHSP.L
PHSP.L Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
PHSP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PHSP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
PHSP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
PHSP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
PHSP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

SLB
SLB Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
SLB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLB Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLB Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
SLB Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLB Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PHSP.L vs. SLB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Physical Silver (PHSP.L) and Schlumberger Limited (SLB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PHSP.LSLBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.32

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.07

4.83

-2.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.66

11.74

-7.08

PHSP.L vs. SLB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PHSP.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is comparable to the SLB Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PHSP.L and SLB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PHSP.L vs. SLB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PHSP.L drawdown since its inception was -70.04%, smaller than the maximum SLB drawdown of -83.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PHSP.L and SLB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PHSP.LSLBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.04%

-83.75%

+13.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-42.16%

-13.44%

-28.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-42.16%

-50.01%

+7.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.16%

-50.01%

+7.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.16%

-83.75%

+41.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-39.18%

-22.70%

-16.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-44.03%

-31.01%

-13.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

18.77%

5.52%

+13.25%

Volatility

PHSP.L vs. SLB - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree Physical Silver (PHSP.L) has a higher volatility of 14.36% compared to Schlumberger Limited (SLB) at 8.93%. This indicates that PHSP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SLB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PHSP.LSLBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.36%

8.93%

+5.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

51.78%

24.64%

+27.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

54.77%

32.69%

+22.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.25%

36.71%

-0.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.08%

39.82%

-8.74%

Dividends

PHSP.L vs. SLB - Dividend Comparison

PHSP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SLB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.06%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PHSP.L
WisdomTree Physical Silver
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SLB
Schlumberger Limited
2.06%2.97%2.87%1.92%1.22%2.09%4.01%4.98%5.54%2.97%2.38%2.87%

Frequently Asked Questions


PHSP.L and SLB have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PHSP.L and SLB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer