PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PHM vs. TGLS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

PHM vs. TGLS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PulteGroup, Inc. (PHM) and Tecnoglass Inc. (TGLS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PHM achieves a 0.60% return, which is significantly higher than TGLS's -15.56% return. Over the past 10 years, PHM has outperformed TGLS with an annualized return of 21.24%, while TGLS has yielded a comparatively lower 17.38% annualized return.


PHM

1D
-0.58%
1M
0.14%
YTD
0.60%
6M
-5.35%
1Y
18.38%
3Y*
18.72%
5Y*
17.21%
10Y*
21.24%

TGLS

1D
-0.02%
1M
6.41%
YTD
-15.56%
6M
-16.64%
1Y
-51.61%
3Y*
0.23%
5Y*
16.86%
10Y*
17.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PHM vs. TGLS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PHM
PulteGroup, Inc.
0.60%8.54%6.22%128.76%-19.22%34.03%12.55%51.33%-20.76%83.43%
TGLS
Tecnoglass Inc.
-15.56%-35.98%74.88%49.86%18.91%281.83%-14.53%10.03%15.12%-36.04%

Correlation

The correlation between PHM and TGLS is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.46

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 11, 2012

0.25

The correlation between PHM and TGLS shifts across timeframes, from 0.25 (all time) to 0.46 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PHM:

$22.82B

TGLS:

$1.89B

EPS

PHM:

$10.36

TGLS:

$3.24

PE Ratio

PHM:

11.36

TGLS:

13.08

PEG Ratio

PHM:

0.80

TGLS:

0.39

PS Ratio

PHM:

1.38

TGLS:

1.93

PB Ratio

PHM:

1.76

TGLS:

2.57

Total Revenue (TTM)

PHM:

$16.83B

TGLS:

$1.01B

Gross Profit (TTM)

PHM:

$4.39B

TGLS:

$419.72M

EBITDA (TTM)

PHM:

$2.76B

TGLS:

$251.16M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PHM vs. TGLS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PHM
PHM Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
PHM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PHM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
PHM Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
PHM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
PHM Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

TGLS
TGLS Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
TGLS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TGLS Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
TGLS Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
TGLS Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
TGLS Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PHM vs. TGLS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PulteGroup, Inc. (PHM) and Tecnoglass Inc. (TGLS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PHMTGLSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.87

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

0.76

+0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.82

-0.92

+1.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.60

-1.36

+2.97

PHM vs. TGLS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PHM Sharpe Ratio is 0.55, which is higher than the TGLS Sharpe Ratio of -1.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PHM and TGLS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PHMTGLSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

-1.32

+1.87

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

0.31

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

0.32

+0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.26

0.27

-0.02

Drawdowns

PHM vs. TGLS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PHM drawdown since its inception was -92.40%, which is greater than TGLS's maximum drawdown of -81.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PHM and TGLS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PHMTGLSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-92.40%

-81.32%

-11.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.60%

-56.42%

+33.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-38.01%

-56.55%

+18.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.01%

-56.55%

+18.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-62.11%

-77.98%

+15.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-20.07%

-51.61%

+31.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-35.48%

-22.93%

-12.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.48%

38.03%

-26.55%

Volatility

PHM vs. TGLS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PulteGroup, Inc. (PHM) is 7.00%, while Tecnoglass Inc. (TGLS) has a volatility of 14.40%. This indicates that PHM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TGLS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PHMTGLSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.00%

14.40%

-7.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.92%

29.72%

-6.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

33.87%

39.17%

-5.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.63%

53.88%

-19.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.44%

54.26%

-17.82%

Dividends

PHM vs. TGLS - Dividend Comparison

PHM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, less than TGLS's 1.42% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PHM
PulteGroup, Inc.
0.82%0.78%0.75%0.66%1.34%1.00%1.16%1.16%1.46%1.08%1.96%1.85%
TGLS
Tecnoglass Inc.
1.42%1.19%0.61%0.79%0.91%0.56%1.59%6.79%5.20%7.21%2.04%0.00%

Financials

PHM vs. TGLS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between PulteGroup, Inc. and Tecnoglass Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B20222023202420252026
3.41B
249.01M
(PHM) Total Revenue
(TGLS) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

PHM vs. TGLS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between PulteGroup, Inc. and Tecnoglass Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

25.0%30.0%35.0%40.0%45.0%50.0%20222023202420252026
24.1%
38.5%
Portfolio components
PHM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, PulteGroup, Inc. reported a gross profit of 822.11M and revenue of 3.41B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 24.1%.

TGLS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tecnoglass Inc. reported a gross profit of 95.83M and revenue of 249.01M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 38.5%.

PHM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, PulteGroup, Inc. reported an operating income of 441.77M and revenue of 3.41B, resulting in an operating margin of 13.0%.

TGLS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tecnoglass Inc. reported an operating income of 44.94M and revenue of 249.01M, resulting in an operating margin of 18.1%.

PHM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, PulteGroup, Inc. reported a net income of 347.00M and revenue of 3.41B, resulting in a net margin of 10.2%.

TGLS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tecnoglass Inc. reported a net income of 31.89M and revenue of 249.01M, resulting in a net margin of 12.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


PHM and TGLS have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TGLS has higher volatility (14.40%) compared to PHM (7.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PHM dropped -92.40% vs TGLS's -81.32%.

PHM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.55 vs -1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PHM and TGLS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer