PHM vs. NTRS
PHM (PulteGroup, Inc.) and NTRS (Northern Trust Corporation) are both stocks. PHM operates in Residential Construction (Consumer Cyclical), while NTRS operates in Asset Management (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, PHM returned 21.24%/yr vs 12.06%/yr for NTRS. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PHM vs. NTRS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PHM achieves a 0.60% return, which is significantly lower than NTRS's 25.08% return. Over the past 10 years, PHM has outperformed NTRS with an annualized return of 21.24%, while NTRS has yielded a comparatively lower 12.06% annualized return.
PHM
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- 0.14%
- YTD
- 0.60%
- 6M
- -5.35%
- 1Y
- 18.38%
- 3Y*
- 18.72%
- 5Y*
- 17.21%
- 10Y*
- 21.24%
NTRS
- 1D
- -0.80%
- 1M
- 5.91%
- YTD
- 25.08%
- 6M
- 27.99%
- 1Y
- 60.27%
- 3Y*
- 35.23%
- 5Y*
- 10.74%
- 10Y*
- 12.06%
PHM vs. NTRS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PHM PulteGroup, Inc. | 0.60% | 8.54% | 6.22% | 128.76% | -19.22% | 34.03% | 12.55% | 51.33% | -20.76% | 83.43% |
NTRS Northern Trust Corporation | 25.08% | 36.92% | 25.63% | -1.02% | -23.82% | 31.65% | -9.29% | 30.59% | -14.68% | 14.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between PHM and NTRS is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 1990 | 0.35 |
The correlation between PHM and NTRS shifts across timeframes, from 0.32 (1 year) to 0.45 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
PHM:
$10.36
NTRS:
$9.09
PHM:
11.36
NTRS:
18.59
PHM:
0.80
NTRS:
1.46
PHM:
1.38
NTRS:
2.26
PHM:
$16.83B
NTRS:
$14.30B
PHM:
$4.39B
NTRS:
$8.09B
PHM:
$2.76B
NTRS:
$3.21B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PHM vs. NTRS — Risk / Return Rank
PHM
NTRS
PHM vs. NTRS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PulteGroup, Inc. (PHM) and Northern Trust Corporation (NTRS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PHM | NTRS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.76 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.40 | -0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.82 | 4.89 | -4.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.60 | 13.20 | -11.60 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PHM | NTRS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 | 2.31 | -1.76 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | 0.37 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 | 0.40 | +0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.26 | 0.39 | -0.13 |
Drawdowns
PHM vs. NTRS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PHM drawdown since its inception was -92.40%, which is greater than NTRS's maximum drawdown of -67.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PHM and NTRS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PHM | NTRS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.40% | -67.67% | -24.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.60% | -12.39% | -10.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -38.01% | -25.21% | -12.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.01% | -50.03% | +12.02% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -62.11% | -50.03% | -12.08% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.07% | -1.83% | -18.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -35.48% | -20.96% | -14.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.48% | 4.58% | +6.90% |
Volatility
PHM vs. NTRS - Volatility Comparison
PulteGroup, Inc. (PHM) has a higher volatility of 7.00% compared to Northern Trust Corporation (NTRS) at 4.74%. This indicates that PHM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NTRS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PHM | NTRS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.00% | 4.74% | +2.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.92% | 18.84% | +4.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.87% | 26.27% | +7.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.63% | 29.58% | +5.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.44% | 30.38% | +6.06% |
Dividends
PHM vs. NTRS - Dividend Comparison
PHM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, less than NTRS's 1.89% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NTRS Northern Trust Corporation | 1.89% | 2.27% | 2.93% | 3.56% | 3.28% | 2.34% | 3.01% | 2.45% | 2.32% | 1.60% | 1.66% | 1.96% |
PHM PulteGroup, Inc. | 0.82% | 0.78% | 0.75% | 0.66% | 1.34% | 1.00% | 1.16% | 1.16% | 1.46% | 1.08% | 1.96% | 1.85% |
Financials
PHM vs. NTRS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between PulteGroup, Inc. and Northern Trust Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
PHM vs. NTRS - Profitability Comparison
PHM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, PulteGroup, Inc. reported a gross profit of 822.11M and revenue of 3.41B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 24.1%.
NTRS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Northern Trust Corporation reported a gross profit of 2.12B and revenue of 3.61B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 58.8%.
PHM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, PulteGroup, Inc. reported an operating income of 441.77M and revenue of 3.41B, resulting in an operating margin of 13.0%.
NTRS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Northern Trust Corporation reported an operating income of 625.80M and revenue of 3.61B, resulting in an operating margin of 17.3%.
PHM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, PulteGroup, Inc. reported a net income of 347.00M and revenue of 3.41B, resulting in a net margin of 10.2%.
NTRS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Northern Trust Corporation reported a net income of 466.00M and revenue of 3.61B, resulting in a net margin of 12.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
PHM and NTRS have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PHM has higher volatility (7.00%) compared to NTRS (4.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PHM dropped -92.40% vs NTRS's -67.67%.
NTRS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 0.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PHM and NTRS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer