NTRS vs. NFLY
NTRS (Northern Trust Corporation) is a stock, while NFLY (YieldMax NFLX Option Income Strategy ETF) is Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax. Over the past year, NTRS returned 46.14% vs -33.01% for NFLY. Their 0.10 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
NTRS vs. NFLY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NTRS achieves a 34.92% return, which is significantly higher than NFLY's -18.75% return.
NTRS
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 3.35%
- 6M
- 22.99%
- YTD
- 34.92%
- 1Y
- 46.14%
- 3Y*
- 35.50%
- 5Y*
- 13.55%
- 10Y*
- 13.21%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.59%
NFLY
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- -6.01%
- 6M
- -8.45%
- YTD
- -18.75%
- 1Y
- -33.01%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 12.61%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $391.78K | $499.39K | $697.16K | |
| $226.42M | $199.37M | $188.33M |
NTRS vs. NFLY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
NTRS Northern Trust Corporation | 34.92% | 36.92% | 25.63% | 6.39% |
NFLY YieldMax NFLX Option Income Strategy ETF | -18.75% | 1.66% | 66.37% | 3.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between NTRS and NFLY is 0.02, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 8, 2023 | 0.10 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NTRS vs. NFLY — Risk / Return Rank
NTRS
NFLY
NTRS vs. NFLY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Northern Trust Corporation (NTRS) and YieldMax NFLX Option Income Strategy ETF (NFLY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NTRS | NFLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 0.78 | +0.54 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.74 | -0.81 | +4.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.29 | -1.47 | +11.76 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NTRS vs. NFLY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NTRS drawdown since its inception was -67.67%, which is greater than NFLY's maximum drawdown of -43.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NTRS and NFLY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NTRS | NFLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.67% | -43.49% | -24.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.39% | -40.74% | +28.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.21% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -50.03% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -50.03% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.56% | -39.67% | +35.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.88% | -10.13% | -10.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.50% | 22.49% | -17.99% |
Volatility
NTRS vs. NFLY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Northern Trust Corporation (NTRS) is 7.02%, while YieldMax NFLX Option Income Strategy ETF (NFLY) has a volatility of 7.78%. This indicates that NTRS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NFLY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NTRS | NFLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.02% | 7.78% | -0.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.84% | 22.61% | -3.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.55% | 28.69% | -4.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.41% | 28.35% | +1.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.23% | 28.35% | +1.88% |
Dividends
NTRS vs. NFLY - Dividend Comparison
NTRS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.75%, less than NFLY's 63.57% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NFLY YieldMax NFLX Option Income Strategy ETF | 63.57% | 61.53% | 49.91% | 11.84% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NTRS Northern Trust Corporation | 1.75% | 2.27% | 2.93% | 3.56% | 3.28% | 2.34% | 3.01% | 2.45% | 2.32% | 1.60% | 1.66% | 1.96% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NTRS and NFLY have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NFLY has higher volatility (7.78%) compared to NTRS (7.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NTRS dropped -67.67% vs NFLY's -43.49%.
NTRS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs -1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NTRS and NFLY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer