PHM vs. INTU
PHM (PulteGroup, Inc.) and INTU (Intuit Inc.) are both stocks. PHM operates in Residential Construction (Consumer Cyclical), while INTU operates in Software - Application (Technology). Over the past 10 years, PHM returned 21.24%/yr vs 11.98%/yr for INTU. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PHM vs. INTU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PHM achieves a 0.60% return, which is significantly higher than INTU's -53.65% return. Over the past 10 years, PHM has outperformed INTU with an annualized return of 21.24%, while INTU has yielded a comparatively lower 11.98% annualized return.
PHM
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- 0.14%
- YTD
- 0.60%
- 6M
- -5.35%
- 1Y
- 18.38%
- 3Y*
- 18.72%
- 5Y*
- 17.21%
- 10Y*
- 21.24%
INTU
- 1D
- 2.95%
- 1M
- -22.91%
- YTD
- -53.65%
- 6M
- -53.22%
- 1Y
- -60.08%
- 3Y*
- -10.25%
- 5Y*
- -7.58%
- 10Y*
- 11.98%
PHM vs. INTU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PHM PulteGroup, Inc. | 0.60% | 8.54% | 6.22% | 128.76% | -19.22% | 34.03% | 12.55% | 51.33% | -20.76% | 83.43% |
INTU Intuit Inc. | -53.65% | 6.09% | 1.16% | 61.76% | -39.12% | 70.27% | 46.12% | 34.11% | 25.86% | 39.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between PHM and INTU is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 22, 1993 | 0.27 |
The correlation between PHM and INTU shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (1 year) to 0.33 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
PHM:
$22.82B
INTU:
$84.32B
PHM:
$10.36
INTU:
$16.37
PHM:
11.36
INTU:
18.66
PHM:
0.80
INTU:
1.12
PHM:
1.38
INTU:
4.09
PHM:
1.76
INTU:
4.09
PHM:
$16.83B
INTU:
$20.93B
PHM:
$4.39B
INTU:
$16.97B
PHM:
$2.76B
INTU:
$6.65B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PHM vs. INTU — Risk / Return Rank
PHM
INTU
PHM vs. INTU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PulteGroup, Inc. (PHM) and Intuit Inc. (INTU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PHM | INTU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.91 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 0.71 | +0.42 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.82 | -0.96 | +1.77 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.60 | -1.83 | +3.43 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PHM | INTU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 | -1.37 | +1.91 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | -0.20 | +0.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 | 0.35 | +0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.26 | 0.35 | -0.10 |
Drawdowns
PHM vs. INTU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PHM drawdown since its inception was -92.40%, which is greater than INTU's maximum drawdown of -75.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PHM and INTU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PHM | INTU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.40% | -75.29% | -17.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.60% | -63.00% | +40.40% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -38.01% | -63.00% | +24.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.01% | -63.00% | +24.99% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -62.11% | -63.00% | +0.89% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.07% | -61.90% | +41.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -35.48% | -24.12% | -11.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.48% | 32.93% | -21.45% |
Volatility
PHM vs. INTU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for PulteGroup, Inc. (PHM) is 7.00%, while Intuit Inc. (INTU) has a volatility of 28.43%. This indicates that PHM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than INTU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PHM | INTU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.00% | 28.43% | -21.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.92% | 42.39% | -19.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.87% | 44.21% | -10.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.63% | 37.47% | -2.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.44% | 33.95% | +2.49% |
Dividends
PHM vs. INTU - Dividend Comparison
PHM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, less than INTU's 1.52% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INTU Intuit Inc. | 1.52% | 0.65% | 0.60% | 0.52% | 0.72% | 0.38% | 0.57% | 0.74% | 0.83% | 0.89% | 1.08% | 1.09% |
PHM PulteGroup, Inc. | 0.82% | 0.78% | 0.75% | 0.66% | 1.34% | 1.00% | 1.16% | 1.16% | 1.46% | 1.08% | 1.96% | 1.85% |
Financials
PHM vs. INTU - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between PulteGroup, Inc. and Intuit Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
PHM vs. INTU - Profitability Comparison
PHM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, PulteGroup, Inc. reported a gross profit of 822.11M and revenue of 3.41B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 24.1%.
INTU - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Intuit Inc. reported a gross profit of 7.24B and revenue of 8.56B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 84.6%.
PHM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, PulteGroup, Inc. reported an operating income of 441.77M and revenue of 3.41B, resulting in an operating margin of 13.0%.
INTU - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Intuit Inc. reported an operating income of 4.02B and revenue of 8.56B, resulting in an operating margin of 47.0%.
PHM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, PulteGroup, Inc. reported a net income of 347.00M and revenue of 3.41B, resulting in a net margin of 10.2%.
INTU - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Intuit Inc. reported a net income of 3.06B and revenue of 8.56B, resulting in a net margin of 35.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
PHM and INTU have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
INTU has higher volatility (28.43%) compared to PHM (7.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PHM dropped -92.40% vs INTU's -75.29%.
PHM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.55 vs -1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PHM and INTU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer