PHDG vs. SPYH

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

PHDG (Invesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF) and SPYH (NEOS S&P 500 Hedged Equity Income ETF) are both Equity Hedged funds. PHDG is passively managed, while SPYH is actively managed. Over the past year, PHDG returned 21.44% vs 17.62% for SPYH. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PHDG charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for SPYH.

Performance

PHDG vs. SPYH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF (PHDG) and NEOS S&P 500 Hedged Equity Income ETF (SPYH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PHDG achieves a 10.56% return, which is significantly higher than SPYH's 4.94% return.

PHDG

• 1D: -0.33%
• 1M: -1.88%
• YTD: 10.56%
• 6M: 10.62%
• 1Y: 21.44%
• 3Y*: 9.78%
• 5Y*: 4.89%
• 10Y*: 7.12%

SPYH

• 1D: -0.26%
• 1M: -0.05%
• YTD: 4.94%
• 6M: 4.71%
• 1Y: 17.62%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PHDG vs. SPYH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
PHDG Invesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF	10.56%	4.70%
SPYH NEOS S&P 500 Hedged Equity Income ETF	4.94%	20.01%

Correlation

The correlation between PHDG and SPYH is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.66
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2025	0.55

The correlation between PHDG and SPYH shifts across timeframes, from 0.55 (all time) to 0.66 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

PHDG vs. SPYH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PHDG

PHDG Risk / Return Rank: 70
PHDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
PHDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
PHDG Omega Ratio Rank: 68
PHDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
PHDG Martin Ratio Rank: 86

SPYH

SPYH Risk / Return Rank: 69
SPYH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
SPYH Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
SPYH Omega Ratio Rank: 72
SPYH Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
SPYH Martin Ratio Rank: 75

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PHDG vs. SPYH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF (PHDG) and NEOS S&P 500 Hedged Equity Income ETF (SPYH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PHDG	SPYH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.90	2.16	-0.26
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.62	2.95	-0.33
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.41	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.93	2.94	+0.99
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.30	13.69	+3.60

PHDG vs. SPYH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PHDG Sharpe Ratio is 1.90, which is comparable to the SPYH Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PHDG and SPYH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PHDG vs. SPYH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PHDG drawdown since its inception was -17.70%, which is greater than SPYH's maximum drawdown of -7.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PHDG and SPYH.

Drawdown Indicators

	PHDG	SPYH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.70%	-7.22%	-10.48%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.48%	-6.02%	+0.54%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.78%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.06%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-17.06%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.01%	-1.14%	-3.87%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.23%	-0.75%	-5.48%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.24%	1.29%	-0.05%

Volatility

PHDG vs. SPYH - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF (PHDG) has a higher volatility of 7.74% compared to NEOS S&P 500 Hedged Equity Income ETF (SPYH) at 3.12%. This indicates that PHDG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPYH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PHDG	SPYH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.74%	3.12%	+4.62%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.73%	6.36%	+3.37%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.39%	8.23%	+3.16%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.40%	12.42%	-1.02%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.15%	12.42%	-0.27%

PHDG vs. SPYH - Expense Ratio Comparison

PHDG has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than SPYH's 0.68% expense ratio.

Dividends

PHDG vs. SPYH - Dividend Comparison

PHDG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.28%, less than SPYH's 7.60% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PHDG Invesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF	2.28%	2.10%	1.94%	1.93%	1.35%	0.44%	0.63%	1.80%	1.56%	1.83%	2.29%	1.64%
SPYH NEOS S&P 500 Hedged Equity Income ETF	7.60%	5.54%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PHDG and SPYH in my portfolio?

PHDG and SPYH have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PHDG or SPYH?

PHDG has higher volatility (7.74%) compared to SPYH (3.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PHDG dropped -17.70% vs SPYH's -7.22%.

Which ETF is better, PHDG or SPYH?

On 1-year performance, PHDG leads with 21.44% vs 17.62% for SPYH. On fees, PHDG is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, SPYH has been the lower-risk option at 3.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PHDG or SPYH?

Over the 1-year period, PHDG has performed better with a 21.44% return vs 17.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PHDG or SPYH?

PHDG is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for SPYH.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PHDG or SPYH?

SPYH has the higher dividend yield at 7.60%, compared with 2.28% for PHDG.

What is the main difference between PHDG and SPYH?

They also come from different issuers: Invesco and NEOS. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for PHDG and 0.68% for SPYH.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SPYH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 1.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.