PH vs. PG
PH (Parker-Hannifin Corporation) and PG (The Procter & Gamble Company) are both stocks. PH operates in Specialty Industrial Machinery (Industrials), while PG operates in Household & Personal Products (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 10 years, PH returned 24.75%/yr vs 8.64%/yr for PG. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PH vs. PG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PH achieves a 0.89% return, which is significantly lower than PG's 2.74% return. Over the past 10 years, PH has outperformed PG with an annualized return of 24.75%, while PG has yielded a comparatively lower 8.64% annualized return.
PH
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 0.49%
- YTD
- 0.89%
- 6M
- 0.81%
- 1Y
- 32.71%
- 3Y*
- 36.81%
- 5Y*
- 25.26%
- 10Y*
- 24.75%
PG
- 1D
- -0.98%
- 1M
- -0.90%
- YTD
- 2.74%
- 6M
- 6.43%
- 1Y
- -8.99%
- 3Y*
- 2.29%
- 5Y*
- 4.10%
- 10Y*
- 8.64%
PH vs. PG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PH Parker-Hannifin Corporation | 0.89% | 39.54% | 39.58% | 60.81% | -6.91% | 18.30% | 34.78% | 40.75% | -24.00% | 44.91% |
PG The Procter & Gamble Company | 2.74% | -12.26% | 17.25% | -0.86% | -5.05% | 20.52% | 14.15% | 39.70% | 3.57% | 12.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between PH and PG is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 1985 | 0.27 |
The correlation between PH and PG shifts across timeframes, from 0.08 (3 years) to 0.27 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
PH:
$113.04B
PG:
$350.63B
PH:
$27.11
PG:
$5.23
PH:
32.58
PG:
27.76
PH:
1.37
PG:
6.79
PH:
5.40
PG:
4.07
PH:
7.26
PG:
6.50
PH:
$20.99B
PG:
$86.72B
PH:
$7.81B
PG:
$43.64B
PH:
$5.31B
PG:
$22.63B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PH vs. PG — Risk / Return Rank
PH
PG
PH vs. PG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH) and The Procter & Gamble Company (PG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PH | PG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.82 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 0.94 | +0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.70 | -0.58 | +2.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.17 | -1.04 | +6.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PH | PG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.34 | -0.48 | +1.82 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 | 0.23 | +0.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.78 | 0.46 | +0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.46 | -0.02 |
Drawdowns
PH vs. PG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PH drawdown since its inception was -66.92%, which is greater than PG's maximum drawdown of -54.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PH and PG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PH | PG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.92% | -54.25% | -12.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.34% | -15.52% | -3.82% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.79% | -21.15% | -5.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.64% | -23.77% | -4.87% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -54.68% | -23.77% | -30.91% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.48% | -15.91% | +2.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.33% | -12.16% | -3.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.34% | 8.93% | -2.59% |
Volatility
PH vs. PG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH) is 5.59%, while The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) has a volatility of 7.01%. This indicates that PH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PH | PG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.59% | 7.01% | -1.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.60% | 15.32% | +3.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.62% | 18.65% | +5.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.61% | 17.79% | +10.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.69% | 19.05% | +12.64% |
Dividends
PH vs. PG - Dividend Comparison
PH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.84%, less than PG's 2.94% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PG The Procter & Gamble Company | 2.94% | 2.91% | 2.36% | 2.55% | 2.38% | 2.08% | 2.24% | 2.37% | 3.09% | 2.98% | 3.18% | 3.31% |
PH Parker-Hannifin Corporation | 0.84% | 0.80% | 1.00% | 1.25% | 1.73% | 1.25% | 1.29% | 1.65% | 1.97% | 1.32% | 1.80% | 2.60% |
Financials
PH vs. PG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Parker-Hannifin Corporation and The Procter & Gamble Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
PH vs. PG - Profitability Comparison
PH - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Parker-Hannifin Corporation reported a gross profit of 2.02B and revenue of 5.49B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.8%.
PG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Procter & Gamble Company reported a gross profit of 10.51B and revenue of 21.24B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.5%.
PH - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Parker-Hannifin Corporation reported an operating income of 1.13B and revenue of 5.49B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.7%.
PG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Procter & Gamble Company reported an operating income of 4.58B and revenue of 21.24B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.6%.
PH - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Parker-Hannifin Corporation reported a net income of 904.00M and revenue of 5.49B, resulting in a net margin of 16.5%.
PG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Procter & Gamble Company reported a net income of 18.50M and revenue of 21.24B, resulting in a net margin of 0.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
PH and PG have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PG has higher volatility (7.01%) compared to PH (5.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PH dropped -66.92% vs PG's -54.25%.
PH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.34 vs -0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PH and PG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer