PH vs. PG
PH (Parker-Hannifin Corporation) and PG (The Procter & Gamble Company) are both stocks. PH operates in Specialty Industrial Machinery (Industrials), while PG operates in Household & Personal Products (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 10 years, PH returned 25.97%/yr vs 8.14%/yr for PG. Their 0.27 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
PH vs. PG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PH achieves a 11.56% return, which is significantly higher than PG's 3.07% return. Over the past 10 years, PH has outperformed PG with an annualized return of 25.97%, while PG has yielded a comparatively lower 8.14% annualized return.
PH
- 1D
- 1.43%
- 1M
- 1.32%
- 6M
- 4.78%
- YTD
- 11.56%
- 1Y
- 34.58%
- 3Y*
- 34.53%
- 5Y*
- 27.26%
- 10Y*
- 25.97%
- ALL TIME*
- 14.99%
PG
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- -1.26%
- 6M
- -3.36%
- YTD
- 3.07%
- 1Y
- -1.15%
- 3Y*
- 0.02%
- 5Y*
- 2.93%
- 10Y*
- 8.14%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.08%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.25B | $1.28B | $1.30B | |
| $537.51M | $523.59M | $635.17M |
PH vs. PG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PH Parker-Hannifin Corporation | 11.56% | 39.54% | 39.58% | 60.81% | -6.91% | 18.30% | 34.78% | 40.75% | -24.00% | 44.91% |
PG The Procter & Gamble Company | 3.07% | -12.26% | 17.25% | -0.86% | -5.05% | 20.52% | 14.15% | 39.70% | 3.57% | 12.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between PH and PG is 0.09, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.08 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.18 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 1985 | 0.27 |
The correlation between PH and PG shifts across timeframes, from 0.08 (3 years) to 0.27 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
PH:
$123.13B
PG:
$336.46B
PH:
$27.15
PG:
$6.62
PH:
35.96
PG:
21.84
PH:
1.52
PG:
7.21
PH:
5.96
PG:
4.03
PH:
8.03
PG:
6.44
PH:
$20.99B
PG:
$87.03B
PH:
$7.81B
PG:
$43.67B
PH:
$5.31B
PG:
$21.25B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PH vs. PG — Risk / Return Rank
PH
PG
PH vs. PG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH) and The Procter & Gamble Company (PG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PH | PG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.94 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.01 | +0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.80 | -0.07 | +1.87 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.07 | -0.13 | +5.20 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PH vs. PG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PH drawdown since its inception was -66.92%, which is greater than PG's maximum drawdown of -54.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PH and PG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PH | PG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.92% | -54.25% | -12.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.34% | -15.52% | -3.82% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.79% | -21.15% | -5.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.64% | -23.77% | -4.87% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -54.68% | -23.77% | -30.91% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.33% | -15.63% | +11.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.30% | -12.17% | -3.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.85% | 9.06% | -2.21% |
Volatility
PH vs. PG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH) is 6.43%, while The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) has a volatility of 6.95%. This indicates that PH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PH | PG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.43% | 6.95% | -0.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.46% | 15.72% | +3.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.70% | 19.64% | +6.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.66% | 18.08% | +10.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.62% | 19.18% | +12.44% |
Dividends
PH vs. PG - Dividend Comparison
PH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.76%, less than PG's 2.97% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PG The Procter & Gamble Company | 2.97% | 2.91% | 2.36% | 2.55% | 2.38% | 2.08% | 2.24% | 2.37% | 3.09% | 2.98% | 3.18% | 3.31% |
PH Parker-Hannifin Corporation | 0.76% | 0.80% | 1.00% | 1.25% | 1.73% | 1.25% | 1.29% | 1.65% | 1.97% | 1.32% | 1.80% | 2.60% |
Financials
PH vs. PG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Parker-Hannifin Corporation and The Procter & Gamble Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
PH vs. PG - Profitability Comparison
PH - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Parker-Hannifin Corporation reported a gross profit of 2.02B and revenue of 5.49B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.8%.
PG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, The Procter & Gamble Company reported a gross profit of 10.28B and revenue of 21.20B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 48.5%.
PH - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Parker-Hannifin Corporation reported an operating income of 1.13B and revenue of 5.49B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.7%.
PG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, The Procter & Gamble Company reported an operating income of 3.95B and revenue of 21.20B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.6%.
PH - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Parker-Hannifin Corporation reported a net income of 904.00M and revenue of 5.49B, resulting in a net margin of 16.5%.
PG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, The Procter & Gamble Company reported a net income of 3.00B and revenue of 21.20B, resulting in a net margin of 14.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
PH and PG have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PG has higher volatility (6.95%) compared to PH (6.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PH dropped -66.92% vs PG's -54.25%.
PH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.35 vs -0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PH and PG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer