PH vs. LMT
PH (Parker-Hannifin Corporation) and LMT (Lockheed Martin Corporation) are both stocks. Both are in the Industrials sector — PH in Specialty Industrial Machinery, LMT in Aerospace & Defense. Over the past 10 years, PH returned 25.12%/yr vs 11.37%/yr for LMT. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PH vs. LMT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PH achieves a 3.21% return, which is significantly lower than LMT's 13.04% return. Over the past 10 years, PH has outperformed LMT with an annualized return of 25.12%, while LMT has yielded a comparatively lower 11.37% annualized return.
PH
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 2.39%
- YTD
- 3.21%
- 6M
- 2.52%
- 1Y
- 36.66%
- 3Y*
- 36.33%
- 5Y*
- 26.12%
- 10Y*
- 25.12%
LMT
- 1D
- -1.52%
- 1M
- 4.60%
- YTD
- 13.04%
- 6M
- 13.84%
- 1Y
- 18.25%
- 3Y*
- 8.98%
- 5Y*
- 9.78%
- 10Y*
- 11.37%
PH vs. LMT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PH Parker-Hannifin Corporation | 3.21% | 39.54% | 39.58% | 60.81% | -6.91% | 18.30% | 34.78% | 40.75% | -24.00% | 44.91% |
LMT Lockheed Martin Corporation | 13.04% | 2.47% | 10.02% | -4.31% | 40.48% | 3.15% | -6.49% | 52.55% | -16.35% | 31.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between PH and LMT is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 1985 | 0.29 |
The correlation between PH and LMT shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (3 years) to 0.31 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
PH:
$115.65B
LMT:
$124.87B
PH:
$27.11
LMT:
$20.61
PH:
33.33
LMT:
26.21
PH:
5.53
LMT:
1.67
PH:
7.43
LMT:
16.67
PH:
$20.99B
LMT:
$75.12B
PH:
$7.81B
LMT:
$7.37B
PH:
$5.31B
LMT:
$8.09B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PH vs. LMT — Risk / Return Rank
PH
LMT
PH vs. LMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH) and Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PH | LMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.78 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.14 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.90 | 0.73 | +1.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.64 | 1.69 | +3.95 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PH vs. LMT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PH drawdown since its inception was -66.92%, smaller than the maximum LMT drawdown of -79.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PH and LMT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PH | LMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.92% | -79.29% | +12.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.34% | -25.15% | +5.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.79% | -31.79% | +5.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.64% | -31.79% | +3.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -54.68% | -36.67% | -18.01% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.49% | -19.63% | +8.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.33% | -26.83% | +11.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.52% | 10.81% | -4.29% |
Volatility
PH vs. LMT - Volatility Comparison
Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH) has a higher volatility of 7.58% compared to Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT) at 7.02%. This indicates that PH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PH | LMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.58% | 7.02% | +0.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.96% | 20.04% | -1.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.10% | 26.71% | -1.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.68% | 22.99% | +5.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.70% | 23.76% | +7.94% |
Dividends
PH vs. LMT - Dividend Comparison
PH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, less than LMT's 2.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LMT Lockheed Martin Corporation | 2.53% | 2.76% | 2.62% | 2.68% | 2.34% | 2.98% | 2.76% | 2.31% | 3.13% | 2.32% | 2.71% | 2.83% |
PH Parker-Hannifin Corporation | 0.82% | 0.80% | 1.00% | 1.25% | 1.73% | 1.25% | 1.29% | 1.65% | 1.97% | 1.32% | 1.80% | 2.60% |
Financials
PH vs. LMT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Parker-Hannifin Corporation and Lockheed Martin Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
PH vs. LMT - Profitability Comparison
PH - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Parker-Hannifin Corporation reported a gross profit of 2.02B and revenue of 5.49B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.8%.
LMT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lockheed Martin Corporation reported a gross profit of 2.08B and revenue of 18.02B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 11.5%.
PH - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Parker-Hannifin Corporation reported an operating income of 1.13B and revenue of 5.49B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.7%.
LMT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lockheed Martin Corporation reported an operating income of 2.06B and revenue of 18.02B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.5%.
PH - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Parker-Hannifin Corporation reported a net income of 904.00M and revenue of 5.49B, resulting in a net margin of 16.5%.
LMT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lockheed Martin Corporation reported a net income of 1.49B and revenue of 18.02B, resulting in a net margin of 8.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
PH and LMT have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PH has higher volatility (7.58%) compared to LMT (7.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PH dropped -66.92% vs LMT's -79.29%.
PH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.47 vs 0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PH and LMT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer