PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PH vs. LDO.MI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

PH vs. LDO.MI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH) and Leonardo S.p.A. (LDO.MI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

PH is traded in USD, while LDO.MI is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the LDO.MI values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PH achieves a 3.21% return, which is significantly lower than LDO.MI's 7.11% return. Over the past 10 years, PH has outperformed LDO.MI with an annualized return of 25.12%, while LDO.MI has yielded a comparatively lower 21.19% annualized return.


PH

1D
0.12%
1M
2.39%
YTD
3.21%
6M
2.52%
1Y
36.66%
3Y*
36.33%
5Y*
26.12%
10Y*
25.12%

LDO.MI

1D
-0.53%
1M
5.96%
YTD
7.11%
6M
9.36%
1Y
11.60%
3Y*
77.52%
5Y*
49.45%
10Y*
21.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PH vs. LDO.MI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PH
Parker-Hannifin Corporation
3.21%39.54%39.58%60.81%-6.91%18.30%34.78%40.75%-24.00%44.91%
LDO.MI
Leonardo S.p.A.
7.11%116.42%65.70%93.63%22.66%-1.81%-36.54%35.08%-25.06%-14.34%

Correlation

The correlation between PH and LDO.MI is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 1, 2007

0.29

The correlation between PH and LDO.MI shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (1 year) to 0.29 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PH vs. LDO.MI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PH
PH Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
PH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PH Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
PH Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
PH Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
PH Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

LDO.MI
LDO.MI Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
LDO.MI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LDO.MI Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
LDO.MI Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
LDO.MI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
LDO.MI Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PH vs. LDO.MI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH) and Leonardo S.p.A. (LDO.MI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PHLDO.MIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.08

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.90

0.51

+1.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.64

1.17

+4.47

PH vs. LDO.MI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PH Sharpe Ratio is 1.47, which is higher than the LDO.MI Sharpe Ratio of 0.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PH and LDO.MI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PH vs. LDO.MI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PH drawdown since its inception was -66.92%, smaller than the maximum LDO.MI drawdown of -86.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PH and LDO.MI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PHLDO.MIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.92%

-86.89%

+19.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.34%

-22.61%

+3.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.79%

-22.61%

-4.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.64%

-39.96%

+11.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-54.68%

-73.30%

+18.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.49%

-15.94%

+4.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.33%

-47.54%

+32.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.52%

9.91%

-3.39%

Volatility

PH vs. LDO.MI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH) is 7.58%, while Leonardo S.p.A. (LDO.MI) has a volatility of 9.96%. This indicates that PH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LDO.MI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PHLDO.MIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.58%

9.96%

-2.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.96%

30.11%

-11.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.10%

41.29%

-16.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.68%

36.75%

-8.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.70%

38.71%

-7.01%

Dividends

PH vs. LDO.MI - Dividend Comparison

PH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, less than LDO.MI's 0.97% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LDO.MI
Leonardo S.p.A.
0.97%1.06%1.08%0.94%1.74%0.00%2.37%1.34%1.82%1.41%0.00%0.00%
PH
Parker-Hannifin Corporation
0.82%0.80%1.00%1.25%1.73%1.25%1.29%1.65%1.97%1.32%1.80%2.60%

Financials

PH vs. LDO.MI - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Parker-Hannifin Corporation and Leonardo S.p.A.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. PH values in USD, LDO.MI values in EUR

Frequently Asked Questions


PH and LDO.MI have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PH and LDO.MI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer