PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PGTQX vs. VSMGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PGTQX vs. VSMGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Global Total Return Fund - Class R6 (PGTQX) and Vanguard LifeStrategy 60/40 Fund (VSMGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PGTQX achieves a -0.81% return, which is significantly lower than VSMGX's 7.62% return. Over the past 10 years, PGTQX has underperformed VSMGX with an annualized return of 1.44%, while VSMGX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.53% annualized return.


PGTQX

1D
0.19%
1M
-0.75%
6M
-1.51%
YTD
-0.81%
1Y
1.03%
3Y*
4.95%
5Y*
-2.15%
10Y*
1.44%
ALL TIME*
1.99%

VSMGX

1D
0.82%
1M
0.38%
6M
5.33%
YTD
7.62%
1Y
14.83%
3Y*
15.02%
5Y*
7.30%
10Y*
8.53%
ALL TIME*
7.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

PGTQX vs. VSMGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PGTQX
PGIM Global Total Return Fund - Class R6
-0.81%11.14%0.31%8.46%-22.33%-5.95%10.07%15.22%-1.59%13.59%
VSMGX
Vanguard LifeStrategy 60/40 Fund
7.62%16.26%15.03%15.70%-16.01%10.08%13.59%19.37%-4.91%13.66%

Correlation

The correlation between PGTQX and VSMGX is 0.62, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.52

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2012

0.30

Over the past year, PGTQX and VSMGX have become more correlated (0.62) than their long-term average of 0.30, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PGTQX vs. VSMGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PGTQX
PGTQX Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
PGTQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PGTQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
PGTQX Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
PGTQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
PGTQX Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

VSMGX
VSMGX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
VSMGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VSMGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
VSMGX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
VSMGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
VSMGX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PGTQX vs. VSMGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Global Total Return Fund - Class R6 (PGTQX) and Vanguard LifeStrategy 60/40 Fund (VSMGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PGTQXVSMGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.33

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.27

2.40

-2.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.68

9.90

-9.23

PGTQX vs. VSMGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PGTQX Sharpe Ratio is 0.24, which is lower than the VSMGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PGTQX and VSMGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PGTQX vs. VSMGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PGTQX drawdown since its inception was -44.72%, which is greater than VSMGX's maximum drawdown of -41.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PGTQX and VSMGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PGTQXVSMGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.72%

-41.13%

-3.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.55%

-6.64%

+2.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.80%

-9.62%

+2.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.16%

-22.29%

-8.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.72%

-22.43%

-22.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-27.66%

-0.58%

-27.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.26%

-4.82%

-15.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.81%

1.61%

+0.20%

Volatility

PGTQX vs. VSMGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PGIM Global Total Return Fund - Class R6 (PGTQX) is 1.40%, while Vanguard LifeStrategy 60/40 Fund (VSMGX) has a volatility of 2.82%. This indicates that PGTQX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VSMGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PGTQXVSMGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.40%

2.82%

-1.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.28%

7.67%

-3.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.15%

9.06%

-3.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.56%

10.33%

-3.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.52%

10.38%

+11.14%

PGTQX vs. VSMGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PGTQX has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is higher than VSMGX's 0.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

PGTQX vs. VSMGX - Dividend Comparison

PGTQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.74%, less than VSMGX's 4.90% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PGTQX
PGIM Global Total Return Fund - Class R6
3.74%4.00%4.47%2.96%3.53%3.36%3.94%8.65%3.63%3.41%4.02%3.85%
VSMGX
Vanguard LifeStrategy 60/40 Fund
4.90%5.25%11.49%4.01%2.66%3.86%3.46%2.52%4.11%1.09%2.26%3.89%

Frequently Asked Questions


PGTQX and VSMGX have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VSMGX has higher volatility (2.82%) compared to PGTQX (1.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PGTQX dropped -44.72% vs VSMGX's -41.13%.

VSMGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs 0.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PGTQX and VSMGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer