VSMGX vs. VBIAX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

VSMGX (Vanguard LifeStrategy Moderate Growth Fund) and VBIAX (Vanguard Balanced Index Fund Admiral Shares) are both Diversified Portfolio funds from Vanguard. Over the past 10 years, VSMGX returned 8.90%/yr vs 9.83%/yr for VBIAX. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VSMGX charges 0.13%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for VBIAX.

Performance

VSMGX vs. VBIAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard LifeStrategy Moderate Growth Fund (VSMGX) and Vanguard Balanced Index Fund Admiral Shares (VBIAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VSMGX achieves a 8.24% return, which is significantly higher than VBIAX's 7.35% return. Over the past 10 years, VSMGX has underperformed VBIAX with an annualized return of 8.90%, while VBIAX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.83% annualized return.

VSMGX

• 1D: 0.24%
• 1M: 3.68%
• YTD: 8.24%
• 6M: 8.79%
• 1Y: 19.95%
• 3Y*: 16.07%
• 5Y*: 7.92%
• 10Y*: 8.90%

VBIAX

• 1D: 0.15%
• 1M: 3.71%
• YTD: 7.35%
• 6M: 7.26%
• 1Y: 19.35%
• 3Y*: 15.04%
• 5Y*: 8.01%
• 10Y*: 9.83%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VSMGX vs. VBIAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
VSMGX Vanguard LifeStrategy Moderate Growth Fund	8.24%	16.26%	15.03%	15.70%	-16.01%	10.08%	13.59%	19.37%	-4.91%	13.66%
VBIAX Vanguard Balanced Index Fund Admiral Shares	7.35%	13.61%	14.58%	17.54%	-16.90%	14.21%	16.40%	21.78%	-2.86%	13.89%

Correlation

The correlation between VSMGX and VBIAX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.97
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.95
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.96
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.96
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 14, 2000	0.93

The correlation between VSMGX and VBIAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

VSMGX vs. VBIAX - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	VSMGX	VBIAX
Technology	27.3%	33.5%
Financial Services	16.1%	12.0%
Industrials	12.4%	9.8%
Consumer Cyclical	9.4%	10.0%
Healthcare	8.3%	9.2%
Communication Services	8.0%	10.3%
Consumer Defensive	4.8%	4.7%
Energy	4.3%	3.7%
Basic Materials	4.3%	2.0%
Utilities	2.7%	2.3%
Real Estate	2.5%	2.4%

Return for Risk

VSMGX vs. VBIAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VSMGX

VSMGX Risk / Return Rank: 69
VSMGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
VSMGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
VSMGX Omega Ratio Rank: 69
VSMGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
VSMGX Martin Ratio Rank: 69

VBIAX

VBIAX Risk / Return Rank: 76
VBIAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
VBIAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
VBIAX Omega Ratio Rank: 70
VBIAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
VBIAX Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VSMGX vs. VBIAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard LifeStrategy Moderate Growth Fund (VSMGX) and Vanguard Balanced Index Fund Admiral Shares (VBIAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	VSMGX	VBIAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.47	2.52	-0.05
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.51	3.59	-0.08
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.47	1.47	0.00
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.05	3.42	-0.37
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	13.33	15.60	-2.27
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

VSMGX vs. VBIAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VSMGX Sharpe Ratio is 2.47, which is comparable to the VBIAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VSMGX and VBIAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	VSMGX	VBIAX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.47	2.52	-0.05
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.78	0.73	+0.05
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.86	0.88	-0.02
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.70	0.64	+0.06

Drawdowns

VSMGX vs. VBIAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VSMGX drawdown since its inception was -41.13%, which is greater than VBIAX's maximum drawdown of -35.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VSMGX and VBIAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	VSMGX	VBIAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-41.13%	-35.90%	-5.23%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.64%	-5.83%	-0.81%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-9.62%	-11.70%	+2.08%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.29%	-21.53%	-0.76%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-22.43%	-22.78%	+0.35%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.84%	-4.44%	-0.40%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.51%	1.27%	+0.24%

Volatility

VSMGX vs. VBIAX - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard LifeStrategy Moderate Growth Fund (VSMGX) has a higher volatility of 2.65% compared to Vanguard Balanced Index Fund Admiral Shares (VBIAX) at 2.26%. This indicates that VSMGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VBIAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VSMGX	VBIAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.65%	2.26%	+0.39%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.65%	6.11%	+0.54%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.19%	7.90%	+0.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.18%	11.05%	-0.87%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.36%	11.21%	-0.85%

VSMGX vs. VBIAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VSMGX has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is higher than VBIAX's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

VSMGX vs. VBIAX - Dividend Comparison

VSMGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.85%, less than VBIAX's 5.21% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
VBIAX Vanguard Balanced Index Fund Admiral Shares	5.21%	6.00%	5.27%	4.35%	2.83%	3.19%	2.65%	2.28%	2.32%	1.95%	2.09%	2.09%
VSMGX Vanguard LifeStrategy Moderate Growth Fund	4.85%	5.25%	11.49%	4.01%	2.66%	3.86%	3.46%	2.52%	4.11%	1.09%	2.26%	3.89%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VSMGX and VBIAX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.97, VSMGX and VBIAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, VSMGX or VBIAX?

VSMGX has higher volatility (2.65%) compared to VBIAX (2.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VSMGX dropped -41.13% vs VBIAX's -35.90%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VBIAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 2.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.