PGTQX vs. KO
PGTQX (PGIM Global Total Return Fund - Class R6) is Global Bonds fund managed by PGIM, while KO (The Coca-Cola Company) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, PGTQX returned 1.79%/yr vs 9.11%/yr for KO. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PGTQX vs. KO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PGTQX achieves a 0.38% return, which is significantly lower than KO's 13.43% return. Over the past 10 years, PGTQX has underperformed KO with an annualized return of 1.79%, while KO has yielded a comparatively higher 9.11% annualized return.
PGTQX
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- 0.36%
- YTD
- 0.38%
- 6M
- 0.73%
- 1Y
- 4.25%
- 3Y*
- 5.89%
- 5Y*
- -1.45%
- 10Y*
- 1.79%
KO
- 1D
- 0.45%
- 1M
- 0.73%
- YTD
- 13.43%
- 6M
- 11.99%
- 1Y
- 13.89%
- 3Y*
- 12.09%
- 5Y*
- 10.20%
- 10Y*
- 9.11%
PGTQX vs. KO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PGTQX PGIM Global Total Return Fund - Class R6 | 0.38% | 11.14% | 0.31% | 8.46% | -22.33% | -5.95% | 10.07% | 15.22% | -1.59% | 13.59% |
KO The Coca-Cola Company | 13.43% | 15.60% | 8.88% | -4.43% | 10.61% | 11.37% | 2.47% | 20.60% | 6.77% | 14.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between PGTQX and KO is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 6, 2012 | 0.12 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PGTQX vs. KO — Risk / Return Rank
PGTQX
KO
PGTQX vs. KO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Global Total Return Fund - Class R6 (PGTQX) and The Coca-Cola Company (KO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PGTQX | KO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.77 | 0.88 | -0.11 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.17 | 1.45 | -0.28 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.16 | -0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.90 | 1.77 | -0.87 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.79 | 3.48 | -0.69 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PGTQX | KO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 | 0.88 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.22 | 0.64 | -0.86 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.08 | 0.50 | -0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.12 | 0.53 | -0.42 |
Drawdowns
PGTQX vs. KO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PGTQX drawdown since its inception was -44.72%, smaller than the maximum KO drawdown of -68.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PGTQX and KO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PGTQX | KO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.72% | -68.23% | +23.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.55% | -7.89% | +3.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.80% | -16.26% | +9.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.46% | -17.27% | -14.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.72% | -36.99% | -7.73% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -26.79% | -3.86% | -22.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.18% | -16.09% | -4.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.46% | 4.00% | -2.54% |
Volatility
PGTQX vs. KO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for PGIM Global Total Return Fund - Class R6 (PGTQX) is 1.91%, while The Coca-Cola Company (KO) has a volatility of 4.16%. This indicates that PGTQX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PGTQX | KO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.91% | 4.16% | -2.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.06% | 11.79% | -7.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.28% | 15.86% | -10.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.55% | 16.00% | -9.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.52% | 18.16% | +3.36% |
Dividends
PGTQX vs. KO - Dividend Comparison
PGTQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.01%, more than KO's 2.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KO The Coca-Cola Company | 2.62% | 2.92% | 3.12% | 3.12% | 2.77% | 2.84% | 2.99% | 2.89% | 3.29% | 3.23% | 3.38% | 3.07% |
PGTQX PGIM Global Total Return Fund - Class R6 | 4.01% | 4.00% | 4.47% | 2.96% | 3.53% | 3.36% | 3.94% | 8.65% | 3.63% | 3.41% | 4.02% | 3.85% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PGTQX and KO have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KO has higher volatility (4.16%) compared to PGTQX (1.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PGTQX dropped -44.72% vs KO's -68.23%.
KO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.88 vs 0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PGTQX and KO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer