PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PGTQX vs. BSV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PGTQX vs. BSV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Global Total Return Fund - Class R6 (PGTQX) and Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund ETF Shares (BSV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PGTQX achieves a 0.01% return, which is significantly lower than BSV's 0.37% return. Over the past 10 years, PGTQX has underperformed BSV with an annualized return of 1.75%, while BSV has yielded a comparatively higher 1.96% annualized return.


PGTQX

1D
-0.37%
1M
-0.02%
YTD
0.01%
6M
0.54%
1Y
3.47%
3Y*
5.76%
5Y*
-1.64%
10Y*
1.75%

BSV

1D
0.08%
1M
0.09%
YTD
0.37%
6M
0.68%
1Y
3.51%
3Y*
4.41%
5Y*
1.63%
10Y*
1.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PGTQX vs. BSV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PGTQX
PGIM Global Total Return Fund - Class R6
0.01%11.14%0.31%8.46%-22.33%-5.95%10.07%15.22%-1.59%13.59%
BSV
Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund ETF Shares
0.37%6.00%3.78%4.90%-5.49%-1.09%4.70%4.98%1.34%1.20%

Correlation

The correlation between PGTQX and BSV is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 6, 2012

0.60

The correlation between PGTQX and BSV shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (all time) to 0.71 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PGTQX vs. BSV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PGTQX
PGTQX Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
PGTQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PGTQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
PGTQX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
PGTQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
PGTQX Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

BSV
BSV Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
BSV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSV Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
BSV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSV Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PGTQX vs. BSV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Global Total Return Fund - Class R6 (PGTQX) and Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund ETF Shares (BSV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PGTQXBSVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.37

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.85

2.74

-1.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.64

9.60

-6.96

PGTQX vs. BSV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PGTQX Sharpe Ratio is 0.73, which is lower than the BSV Sharpe Ratio of 1.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PGTQX and BSV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PGTQXBSVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

1.97

-1.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.25

0.60

-0.85

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.08

0.83

-0.75

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.11

0.85

-0.74

Drawdowns

PGTQX vs. BSV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PGTQX drawdown since its inception was -44.72%, which is greater than BSV's maximum drawdown of -8.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PGTQX and BSV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PGTQXBSVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.72%

-8.54%

-36.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.55%

-1.29%

-3.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.80%

-1.53%

-5.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.46%

-8.54%

-22.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.72%

-8.54%

-36.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-27.07%

-0.55%

-26.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.18%

-0.97%

-19.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.47%

0.37%

+1.10%

Volatility

PGTQX vs. BSV - Volatility Comparison

PGIM Global Total Return Fund - Class R6 (PGTQX) has a higher volatility of 1.94% compared to Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund ETF Shares (BSV) at 0.53%. This indicates that PGTQX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BSV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PGTQXBSVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.94%

0.53%

+1.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.06%

1.26%

+2.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.30%

1.81%

+3.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.55%

2.72%

+3.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.51%

2.37%

+19.14%

PGTQX vs. BSV - Expense Ratio Comparison

PGTQX has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is higher than BSV's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

PGTQX vs. BSV - Dividend Comparison

PGTQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.02%, which matches BSV's 3.99% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BSV
Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund ETF Shares
3.99%3.83%3.38%2.46%1.50%1.45%1.79%2.29%1.99%1.65%1.48%1.40%
PGTQX
PGIM Global Total Return Fund - Class R6
4.02%4.00%4.47%2.96%3.53%3.36%3.94%8.65%3.63%3.41%4.02%3.85%

Frequently Asked Questions


PGTQX and BSV have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PGTQX has higher volatility (1.94%) compared to BSV (0.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PGTQX dropped -44.72% vs BSV's -8.54%.

BSV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PGTQX and BSV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer