PGTAX vs. GTTIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Putnam Global Technology Fund Class A (PGTAX) and Gabelli Global Content & Connectivity Fund Class I (GTTIX).
PGTAX is a passively managed fund by Putnam that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI Information Technology Index (NR). It was launched on Dec 18, 2008. GTTIX is an actively managed fund by Gabelli. It was launched on Nov 1, 1993.
Performance
PGTAX vs. GTTIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PGTAX vs. GTTIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PGTAX Putnam Global Technology Fund Class A | -3.86% | 23.03% | 27.57% | 53.42% | -32.46% | 11.44% | 70.50% | 47.20% | -6.96% | 46.70% |
GTTIX Gabelli Global Content & Connectivity Fund Class I | -1.25% | 27.42% | 14.93% | 22.82% | -28.59% | 5.17% | 16.44% | 16.44% | -11.28% | 14.18% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PGTAX achieves a -3.86% return, which is significantly lower than GTTIX's -1.25% return. Over the past 10 years, PGTAX has outperformed GTTIX with an annualized return of 21.07%, while GTTIX has yielded a comparatively lower 6.15% annualized return.
PGTAX
- 1D
- 4.59%
- 1M
- -5.01%
- YTD
- -3.86%
- 6M
- -4.20%
- 1Y
- 34.92%
- 3Y*
- 23.29%
- 5Y*
- 10.52%
- 10Y*
- 21.07%
GTTIX
- 1D
- 1.78%
- 1M
- -5.55%
- YTD
- -1.25%
- 6M
- -0.57%
- 1Y
- 21.13%
- 3Y*
- 17.11%
- 5Y*
- 4.61%
- 10Y*
- 6.15%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PGTAX vs. GTTIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PGTAX has a 1.04% expense ratio, which is higher than GTTIX's 0.90% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PGTAX vs. GTTIX — Risk / Return Rank
PGTAX
GTTIX
PGTAX vs. GTTIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam Global Technology Fund Class A (PGTAX) and Gabelli Global Content & Connectivity Fund Class I (GTTIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PGTAX | GTTIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.29 | 1.48 | -0.19 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.89 | 2.04 | -0.15 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.27 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.47 | 2.22 | +0.25 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.80 | 5.71 | +2.09 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PGTAX | GTTIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.29 | 1.48 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 | 0.28 | +0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.88 | 0.38 | +0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.84 | 0.41 | +0.43 |
Correlation
The correlation between PGTAX and GTTIX is 0.72, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
PGTAX vs. GTTIX - Dividend Comparison
PGTAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.91%, less than GTTIX's 18.16% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PGTAX Putnam Global Technology Fund Class A | 11.91% | 11.45% | 6.71% | 0.38% | 1.52% | 22.04% | 14.04% | 2.49% | 9.37% | 6.91% | 0.83% | 4.64% |
GTTIX Gabelli Global Content & Connectivity Fund Class I | 18.16% | 17.94% | 0.00% | 0.32% | 2.29% | 6.74% | 3.09% | 7.22% | 6.96% | 7.11% | 7.34% | 8.62% |
Drawdowns
PGTAX vs. GTTIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PGTAX drawdown since its inception was -42.21%, which is greater than GTTIX's maximum drawdown of -39.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PGTAX and GTTIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PGTAX | GTTIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.21% | -39.84% | -2.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.52% | -9.20% | -5.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.21% | -39.84% | -2.37% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.21% | -39.84% | -2.37% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.71% | -6.34% | -3.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.72% | -8.22% | +1.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.60% | 3.68% | +0.92% |
Volatility
PGTAX vs. GTTIX - Volatility Comparison
Putnam Global Technology Fund Class A (PGTAX) has a higher volatility of 9.39% compared to Gabelli Global Content & Connectivity Fund Class I (GTTIX) at 5.17%. This indicates that PGTAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GTTIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PGTAX | GTTIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.39% | 5.17% | +4.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.20% | 10.09% | +7.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.33% | 14.69% | +13.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.75% | 16.28% | +8.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.91% | 16.31% | +7.60% |