PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PGTAX vs. TEDMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PGTAX vs. TEDMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Putnam Global Technology Fund Class A (PGTAX) and Templeton Developing Markets Trust (TEDMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PGTAX achieves a 41.03% return, which is significantly lower than TEDMX's 43.42% return. Over the past 10 years, PGTAX has outperformed TEDMX with an annualized return of 25.62%, while TEDMX has yielded a comparatively lower 13.51% annualized return.


PGTAX

1D
3.90%
1M
21.91%
YTD
41.03%
6M
39.72%
1Y
74.14%
3Y*
36.36%
5Y*
19.40%
10Y*
25.62%

TEDMX

1D
3.49%
1M
18.46%
YTD
43.42%
6M
47.34%
1Y
83.49%
3Y*
32.81%
5Y*
11.04%
10Y*
13.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PGTAX vs. TEDMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PGTAX
Putnam Global Technology Fund Class A
41.03%23.03%27.57%53.42%-32.46%11.44%70.50%47.20%-6.96%46.70%
TEDMX
Templeton Developing Markets Trust
43.42%44.71%8.14%12.28%-22.17%-5.82%18.65%26.39%-16.21%40.21%

Correlation

The correlation between PGTAX and TEDMX is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 22, 2008

0.64

The correlation between PGTAX and TEDMX shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (all time) to 0.75 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PGTAX vs. TEDMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PGTAX
PGTAX Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
PGTAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PGTAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
PGTAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
PGTAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
PGTAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

TEDMX
TEDMX Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
TEDMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TEDMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
TEDMX Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
TEDMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
TEDMX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PGTAX vs. TEDMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam Global Technology Fund Class A (PGTAX) and Templeton Developing Markets Trust (TEDMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PGTAXTEDMXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.47

4.25

-0.78

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.11

4.95

-0.84

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.56

1.77

-0.21

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.43

5.64

-0.20

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

17.36

23.02

-5.66

PGTAX vs. TEDMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PGTAX Sharpe Ratio is 3.47, which is comparable to the TEDMX Sharpe Ratio of 4.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PGTAX and TEDMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PGTAXTEDMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.47

4.25

-0.78

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

0.57

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.07

0.71

+0.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.95

0.42

+0.53

Drawdowns

PGTAX vs. TEDMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PGTAX drawdown since its inception was -42.21%, smaller than the maximum TEDMX drawdown of -64.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PGTAX and TEDMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PGTAXTEDMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.21%

-64.97%

+22.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.67%

-14.80%

+1.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.42%

-14.80%

-13.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.21%

-42.15%

-0.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.21%

-44.36%

+2.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.67%

-19.46%

+12.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.28%

3.62%

+0.66%

Volatility

PGTAX vs. TEDMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Putnam Global Technology Fund Class A (PGTAX) is 7.59%, while Templeton Developing Markets Trust (TEDMX) has a volatility of 8.90%. This indicates that PGTAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TEDMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PGTAXTEDMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.59%

8.90%

-1.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.63%

17.57%

+0.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.02%

20.32%

+1.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.96%

19.51%

+5.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.10%

19.12%

+4.98%

PGTAX vs. TEDMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PGTAX has a 1.04% expense ratio, which is lower than TEDMX's 1.38% expense ratio.


Dividends

PGTAX vs. TEDMX - Dividend Comparison

PGTAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.12%, more than TEDMX's 1.84% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PGTAX
Putnam Global Technology Fund Class A
8.12%11.45%6.71%0.38%1.52%22.04%14.04%2.49%9.37%6.91%0.83%4.64%
TEDMX
Templeton Developing Markets Trust
1.84%2.64%3.30%3.44%5.25%6.76%2.40%4.54%1.35%0.90%1.20%1.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


PGTAX and TEDMX have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TEDMX has higher volatility (8.90%) compared to PGTAX (7.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PGTAX dropped -42.21% vs TEDMX's -64.97%.

TEDMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.25 vs 3.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PGTAX and TEDMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer