PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PGTAX vs. PGOYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PGTAX vs. PGOYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Putnam Global Technology Fund Class A (PGTAX) and Putnam Large Cap Growth Y (PGOYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PGTAX achieves a 40.67% return, which is significantly higher than PGOYX's 8.42% return. Over the past 10 years, PGTAX has outperformed PGOYX with an annualized return of 25.53%, while PGOYX has yielded a comparatively lower 18.65% annualized return.


PGTAX

1D
-0.79%
1M
15.48%
YTD
40.67%
6M
39.42%
1Y
69.95%
3Y*
36.30%
5Y*
19.21%
10Y*
25.53%

PGOYX

1D
-0.03%
1M
3.27%
YTD
8.42%
6M
7.72%
1Y
24.69%
3Y*
24.05%
5Y*
14.37%
10Y*
18.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PGTAX vs. PGOYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PGTAX
Putnam Global Technology Fund Class A
40.67%23.03%27.57%53.42%-32.46%11.44%70.50%47.20%-6.96%46.70%
PGOYX
Putnam Large Cap Growth Y
8.42%14.56%33.58%44.57%-30.25%22.95%38.79%36.76%2.58%31.29%

Correlation

The correlation between PGTAX and PGOYX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 22, 2008

0.92

The correlation between PGTAX and PGOYX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PGTAX vs. PGOYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PGTAX
PGTAX Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
PGTAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PGTAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
PGTAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
PGTAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
PGTAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

PGOYX
PGOYX Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
PGOYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PGOYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
PGOYX Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
PGOYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
PGOYX Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PGTAX vs. PGOYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam Global Technology Fund Class A (PGTAX) and Putnam Large Cap Growth Y (PGOYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PGTAXPGOYXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.27

+0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.16

1.48

+3.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.43

4.94

+11.49

PGTAX vs. PGOYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PGTAX Sharpe Ratio is 3.18, which is higher than the PGOYX Sharpe Ratio of 1.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PGTAX and PGOYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PGTAXPGOYXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.18

1.52

+1.67

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

0.67

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.06

0.88

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.95

0.35

+0.60

Drawdowns

PGTAX vs. PGOYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PGTAX drawdown since its inception was -42.21%, smaller than the maximum PGOYX drawdown of -76.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PGTAX and PGOYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PGTAXPGOYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.21%

-76.03%

+33.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.67%

-16.34%

+2.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.42%

-23.63%

-4.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.21%

-34.01%

-8.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.21%

-34.01%

-8.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.41%

-1.23%

-1.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.67%

-31.53%

+24.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.28%

4.88%

-0.60%

Volatility

PGTAX vs. PGOYX - Volatility Comparison

Putnam Global Technology Fund Class A (PGTAX) has a higher volatility of 8.29% compared to Putnam Large Cap Growth Y (PGOYX) at 3.90%. This indicates that PGTAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PGOYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PGTAXPGOYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.29%

3.90%

+4.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.84%

12.12%

+5.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.14%

15.93%

+6.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.98%

21.66%

+3.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.11%

21.20%

+2.91%

PGTAX vs. PGOYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PGTAX has a 1.04% expense ratio, which is higher than PGOYX's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

PGTAX vs. PGOYX - Dividend Comparison

PGTAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.14%, more than PGOYX's 4.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PGOYX
Putnam Large Cap Growth Y
4.83%5.23%4.25%0.46%7.30%8.55%3.12%3.65%7.92%2.05%0.02%5.78%
PGTAX
Putnam Global Technology Fund Class A
8.14%11.45%6.71%0.38%1.52%22.04%14.04%2.49%9.37%6.91%0.83%4.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


PGTAX and PGOYX have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PGTAX has higher volatility (8.29%) compared to PGOYX (3.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PGTAX dropped -42.21% vs PGOYX's -76.03%.

PGTAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.18 vs 1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PGTAX and PGOYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer