PGTAX vs. FDTRX
Compare and contrast key facts about Putnam Global Technology Fund Class A (PGTAX) and Franklin DynaTech Fund Class R6 (FDTRX).
PGTAX is a passively managed fund by Putnam that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI Information Technology Index (NR). It was launched on Dec 18, 2008. FDTRX is managed by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on Jun 24, 2013.
Performance
PGTAX vs. FDTRX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PGTAX vs. FDTRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PGTAX Putnam Global Technology Fund Class A | -3.86% | 23.03% | 27.57% | 53.42% | -32.46% | 11.44% | 70.50% | 47.20% | -6.96% | 46.70% |
FDTRX Franklin DynaTech Fund Class R6 | -10.89% | 18.97% | 31.01% | 44.92% | -40.07% | 12.90% | 58.22% | 36.84% | 3.22% | 39.87% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PGTAX achieves a -3.86% return, which is significantly higher than FDTRX's -10.89% return. Over the past 10 years, PGTAX has outperformed FDTRX with an annualized return of 21.07%, while FDTRX has yielded a comparatively lower 16.37% annualized return.
PGTAX
- 1D
- 4.59%
- 1M
- -5.01%
- YTD
- -3.86%
- 6M
- -4.20%
- 1Y
- 34.92%
- 3Y*
- 23.29%
- 5Y*
- 10.52%
- 10Y*
- 21.07%
FDTRX
- 1D
- 5.05%
- 1M
- -5.11%
- YTD
- -10.89%
- 6M
- -11.59%
- 1Y
- 19.81%
- 3Y*
- 19.58%
- 5Y*
- 6.29%
- 10Y*
- 16.37%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PGTAX vs. FDTRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PGTAX has a 1.04% expense ratio, which is higher than FDTRX's 0.48% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PGTAX vs. FDTRX — Risk / Return Rank
PGTAX
FDTRX
PGTAX vs. FDTRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam Global Technology Fund Class A (PGTAX) and Franklin DynaTech Fund Class R6 (FDTRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PGTAX | FDTRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.29 | 0.80 | +0.49 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.89 | 1.31 | +0.57 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.18 | +0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.47 | 0.83 | +1.65 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.80 | 2.70 | +5.10 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PGTAX | FDTRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.29 | 0.80 | +0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 | 0.24 | +0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.88 | 0.67 | +0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.84 | 0.66 | +0.18 |
Correlation
The correlation between PGTAX and FDTRX is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
PGTAX vs. FDTRX - Dividend Comparison
PGTAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.91%, more than FDTRX's 11.66% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PGTAX Putnam Global Technology Fund Class A | 11.91% | 11.45% | 6.71% | 0.38% | 1.52% | 22.04% | 14.04% | 2.49% | 9.37% | 6.91% | 0.83% | 4.64% |
FDTRX Franklin DynaTech Fund Class R6 | 11.66% | 10.39% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.36% | 0.00% | 0.71% | 2.80% | 1.71% | 3.44% | 2.40% |
Drawdowns
PGTAX vs. FDTRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PGTAX drawdown since its inception was -42.21%, smaller than the maximum FDTRX drawdown of -48.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PGTAX and FDTRX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PGTAX | FDTRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.21% | -48.10% | +5.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.52% | -20.39% | +5.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.21% | -48.10% | +5.89% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.21% | -48.10% | +5.89% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.71% | -16.37% | +6.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.72% | -9.22% | +2.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.60% | 6.25% | -1.65% |
Volatility
PGTAX vs. FDTRX - Volatility Comparison
Putnam Global Technology Fund Class A (PGTAX) and Franklin DynaTech Fund Class R6 (FDTRX) have volatilities of 9.39% and 9.28%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PGTAX | FDTRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.39% | 9.28% | +0.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.20% | 16.81% | +0.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.33% | 26.47% | +1.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.75% | 26.27% | -1.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.91% | 24.53% | -0.62% |