PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PGRO vs. PULT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PGRO vs. PULT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Putnam Focused Large Cap Growth ETF (PGRO) and Putnam ESG Ultra Short ETF (PULT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


PGRO

1D
0.76%
1M
-2.55%
6M
2.79%
YTD
1.37%
1Y
9.32%
3Y*
19.26%
5Y*
10.40%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
12.18%

PULT

1D
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$9.82M$4.94M$2.18M

PGRO vs. PULT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
PGRO
Putnam Focused Large Cap Growth ETF
1.37%15.13%34.01%42.10%
PULT
Putnam ESG Ultra Short ETF
1.23%5.08%5.93%5.47%

Correlation

The correlation between PGRO and PULT is 0.06, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 20, 2023

0.06

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PGRO vs. PULT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PGRO
PGRO Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
PGRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PGRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
PGRO Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
PGRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
PGRO Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

PULT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PGRO vs. PULT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam Focused Large Cap Growth ETF (PGRO) and Putnam ESG Ultra Short ETF (PULT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PGROPULTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.32

PGRO vs. PULT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PGRO vs. PULT - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PGROPULTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.52%

Volatility

PGRO vs. PULT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PGROPULTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.77%

PGRO vs. PULT - Expense Ratio Comparison

PGRO has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than PULT's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

PGRO vs. PULT - Dividend Comparison

PGRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, while PULT has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
PGRO
Putnam Focused Large Cap Growth ETF
0.02%0.02%0.08%0.19%0.12%
PULT
Putnam ESG Ultra Short ETF
3.89%4.59%5.38%4.88%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PGRO and PULT have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PULT is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PULT is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for PGRO.

PULT has the higher dividend yield at 3.89%, compared with 0.02% for PGRO.

PGRO is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while PULT is Ultrashort Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for PGRO and 0.25% for PULT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PGRO and PULT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer