PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PGRO vs. FAAR
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

PGRO vs. FAAR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Putnam Focused Large Cap Growth ETF (PGRO) and First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF (FAAR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

PGRO vs. FAAR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
PGRO
Putnam Focused Large Cap Growth ETF
-9.76%15.13%34.01%45.19%-31.53%16.67%
FAAR
First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF
24.94%8.07%5.97%-5.63%10.15%0.71%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PGRO achieves a -9.76% return, which is significantly lower than FAAR's 24.94% return.


PGRO

1D
3.63%
1M
-5.32%
YTD
-9.76%
6M
-9.34%
1Y
16.44%
3Y*
20.79%
5Y*
10Y*

FAAR

1D
-0.05%
1M
12.00%
YTD
24.94%
6M
21.95%
1Y
30.08%
3Y*
10.56%
5Y*
9.41%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


PGRO vs. FAAR - Expense Ratio Comparison

PGRO has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than FAAR's 0.95% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

PGRO vs. FAAR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PGRO
PGRO Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
PGRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PGRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
PGRO Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
PGRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
PGRO Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

FAAR
FAAR Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
FAAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAAR Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
FAAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAAR Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PGRO vs. FAAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam Focused Large Cap Growth ETF (PGRO) and First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF (FAAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PGROFAARDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.72

1.97

-1.25

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.21

2.65

-1.44

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.35

-0.18

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.00

2.71

-1.71

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.36

7.95

-4.58

PGRO vs. FAAR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PGRO Sharpe Ratio is 0.72, which is lower than the FAAR Sharpe Ratio of 1.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PGRO and FAAR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PGROFAARDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

1.97

-1.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.45

+0.03

Correlation

The correlation between PGRO and FAAR is 0.01, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

PGRO vs. FAAR - Dividend Comparison

PGRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, less than FAAR's 9.21% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
PGRO
Putnam Focused Large Cap Growth ETF
0.02%0.02%0.08%0.19%0.12%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FAAR
First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF
9.21%11.63%3.45%3.20%5.82%6.49%3.05%1.02%0.58%2.83%

Drawdowns

PGRO vs. FAAR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PGRO drawdown since its inception was -34.73%, which is greater than FAAR's maximum drawdown of -18.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PGRO and FAAR.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


PGROFAARDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.73%

-18.03%

-16.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.34%

-11.54%

-4.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.31%

-0.51%

-12.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.54%

-7.97%

-2.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.85%

3.93%

+0.92%

Volatility

PGRO vs. FAAR - Volatility Comparison

Putnam Focused Large Cap Growth ETF (PGRO) has a higher volatility of 6.91% compared to First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF (FAAR) at 5.66%. This indicates that PGRO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FAAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


PGROFAARDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.91%

5.66%

+1.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.72%

10.64%

+2.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.89%

15.33%

+7.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.93%

13.00%

+8.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.93%

11.54%

+10.39%