PGRO vs. DGRO
PGRO (Putnam Focused Large Cap Growth ETF) and DGRO (iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. PGRO is actively managed, while DGRO is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PGRO returned 14.11%/yr vs 10.54%/yr for DGRO. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PGRO charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for DGRO.
Performance
PGRO vs. DGRO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with PGRO having a 9.11% return and DGRO slightly lower at 8.76%.
PGRO
- 1D
- -0.97%
- 1M
- 6.31%
- YTD
- 9.11%
- 6M
- 8.47%
- 1Y
- 25.32%
- 3Y*
- 24.74%
- 5Y*
- 14.11%
- 10Y*
- —
DGRO
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- 3.14%
- YTD
- 8.76%
- 6M
- 8.75%
- 1Y
- 22.54%
- 3Y*
- 16.99%
- 5Y*
- 10.54%
- 10Y*
- 13.30%
PGRO vs. DGRO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PGRO Putnam Focused Large Cap Growth ETF | 9.11% | 15.13% | 34.01% | 45.19% | -31.53% | 16.67% |
DGRO iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF | 8.76% | 15.69% | 16.62% | 10.47% | -7.91% | 11.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between PGRO and DGRO is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2021 | 0.64 |
The correlation between PGRO and DGRO shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (1 year) to 0.64 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
PGRO vs. DGRO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PGRO
DGRO
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Healthcare
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Energy
-
Technology
PGRO
DGRO
Communication Services
PGRO
DGRO
Consumer Cyclical
PGRO
DGRO
Industrials
PGRO
DGRO
Healthcare
PGRO
DGRO
Financial Services
PGRO
DGRO
Consumer Defensive
PGRO
DGRO
Basic Materials
PGRO
DGRO
Utilities
PGRO
DGRO
Real Estate
PGRO
DGRO
-
Energy
PGRO
-
DGRO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PGRO vs. DGRO — Risk / Return Rank
PGRO
DGRO
PGRO vs. DGRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam Focused Large Cap Growth ETF (PGRO) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PGRO | DGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.81 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.43 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.56 | 3.50 | -1.94 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.12 | 13.52 | -8.40 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PGRO | DGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.58 | 2.39 | -0.81 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 | 0.77 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.80 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.66 | 0.76 | -0.11 |
Drawdowns
PGRO vs. DGRO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PGRO drawdown since its inception was -34.73%, roughly equal to the maximum DGRO drawdown of -35.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PGRO and DGRO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PGRO | DGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.73% | -35.10% | +0.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.34% | -6.47% | -9.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.31% | -14.03% | -9.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.73% | -19.31% | -15.42% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.10% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.07% | -0.28% | -0.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.27% | -3.44% | -6.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.96% | 1.67% | +3.29% |
Volatility
PGRO vs. DGRO - Volatility Comparison
Putnam Focused Large Cap Growth ETF (PGRO) has a higher volatility of 4.05% compared to iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) at 2.21%. This indicates that PGRO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PGRO | DGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.05% | 2.21% | +1.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.28% | 6.91% | +5.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.10% | 9.48% | +6.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.81% | 13.82% | +7.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.77% | 16.62% | +5.15% |
PGRO vs. DGRO - Expense Ratio Comparison
PGRO has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than DGRO's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
PGRO vs. DGRO - Dividend Comparison
PGRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, less than DGRO's 1.96% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGRO iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF | 1.96% | 2.09% | 2.26% | 2.45% | 2.34% | 1.93% | 2.30% | 2.21% | 2.44% | 2.03% | 2.27% | 2.52% |
PGRO Putnam Focused Large Cap Growth ETF | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.08% | 0.19% | 0.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PGRO and DGRO have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PGRO has higher volatility (4.05%) compared to DGRO (2.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PGRO dropped -34.73% vs DGRO's -35.10%.
On 5-year performance, PGRO leads with 14.11% vs 10.54% for DGRO. On fees, DGRO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, DGRO has been the lower-risk option at 2.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, PGRO has performed better with a 14.11% return vs 10.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DGRO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for PGRO.
DGRO has the higher dividend yield at 1.96%, compared with 0.02% for PGRO.
They also come from different issuers: Power Corporation of Canada and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for PGRO and 0.08% for DGRO.
DGRO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PGRO and DGRO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer