PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PGRO vs. DGRO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PGRO vs. DGRO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Putnam Focused Large Cap Growth ETF (PGRO) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with PGRO having a 9.11% return and DGRO slightly lower at 8.76%.


PGRO

1D
-0.97%
1M
6.31%
YTD
9.11%
6M
8.47%
1Y
25.32%
3Y*
24.74%
5Y*
14.11%
10Y*

DGRO

1D
-0.28%
1M
3.14%
YTD
8.76%
6M
8.75%
1Y
22.54%
3Y*
16.99%
5Y*
10.54%
10Y*
13.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PGRO vs. DGRO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
PGRO
Putnam Focused Large Cap Growth ETF
9.11%15.13%34.01%45.19%-31.53%16.67%
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
8.76%15.69%16.62%10.47%-7.91%11.43%

Correlation

The correlation between PGRO and DGRO is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2021

0.64

The correlation between PGRO and DGRO shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (1 year) to 0.64 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PGRO vs. DGRO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PGRO
DGRO

Technology

49.5%
19.4%

Communication Services

14.3%
0.1%

Consumer Cyclical

10.4%
5.7%

Industrials

7.1%
10.8%

Healthcare

7.1%
16.4%

Financial Services

5.4%
21.2%

Consumer Defensive

2.7%
11.5%

Basic Materials

2.5%
2.5%

Utilities

1.1%
6.9%

Real Estate

0.9%

-

Energy

-

5.6%

Technology

PGRO
49.5%
DGRO
19.4%

Communication Services

PGRO
14.3%
DGRO
0.1%

Consumer Cyclical

PGRO
10.4%
DGRO
5.7%

Industrials

PGRO
7.1%
DGRO
10.8%

Healthcare

PGRO
7.1%
DGRO
16.4%

Financial Services

PGRO
5.4%
DGRO
21.2%

Consumer Defensive

PGRO
2.7%
DGRO
11.5%

Basic Materials

PGRO
2.5%
DGRO
2.5%

Utilities

PGRO
1.1%
DGRO
6.9%

Real Estate

PGRO
0.9%
DGRO

-

Energy

PGRO

-

DGRO
5.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PGRO vs. DGRO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PGRO
PGRO Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
PGRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PGRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
PGRO Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
PGRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
PGRO Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

DGRO
DGRO Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
DGRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGRO Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
DGRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGRO Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PGRO vs. DGRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam Focused Large Cap Growth ETF (PGRO) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PGRODGRODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.81

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.43

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.56

3.50

-1.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.12

13.52

-8.40

PGRO vs. DGRO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PGRO Sharpe Ratio is 1.58, which is lower than the DGRO Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PGRO and DGRO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PGRODGRODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.58

2.39

-0.81

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

0.77

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.66

0.76

-0.11

Drawdowns

PGRO vs. DGRO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PGRO drawdown since its inception was -34.73%, roughly equal to the maximum DGRO drawdown of -35.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PGRO and DGRO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PGRODGRODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.73%

-35.10%

+0.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.34%

-6.47%

-9.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.31%

-14.03%

-9.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.73%

-19.31%

-15.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.07%

-0.28%

-0.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.27%

-3.44%

-6.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.96%

1.67%

+3.29%

Volatility

PGRO vs. DGRO - Volatility Comparison

Putnam Focused Large Cap Growth ETF (PGRO) has a higher volatility of 4.05% compared to iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) at 2.21%. This indicates that PGRO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PGRODGRODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.05%

2.21%

+1.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.28%

6.91%

+5.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.10%

9.48%

+6.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.81%

13.82%

+7.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.77%

16.62%

+5.15%

PGRO vs. DGRO - Expense Ratio Comparison

PGRO has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than DGRO's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

PGRO vs. DGRO - Dividend Comparison

PGRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, less than DGRO's 1.96% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
1.96%2.09%2.26%2.45%2.34%1.93%2.30%2.21%2.44%2.03%2.27%2.52%
PGRO
Putnam Focused Large Cap Growth ETF
0.02%0.02%0.08%0.19%0.12%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PGRO and DGRO have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PGRO has higher volatility (4.05%) compared to DGRO (2.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PGRO dropped -34.73% vs DGRO's -35.10%.

On 5-year performance, PGRO leads with 14.11% vs 10.54% for DGRO. On fees, DGRO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, DGRO has been the lower-risk option at 2.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, PGRO has performed better with a 14.11% return vs 10.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DGRO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for PGRO.

DGRO has the higher dividend yield at 1.96%, compared with 0.02% for PGRO.

They also come from different issuers: Power Corporation of Canada and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for PGRO and 0.08% for DGRO.

DGRO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PGRO and DGRO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer