PGR vs. CHAT
PGR (The Progressive Corporation) is a stock, while CHAT (Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF) is Technology Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill. Over the past 3 years, PGR returned 22.68%/yr vs 41.74%/yr for CHAT. At a correlation of -0.18, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
PGR vs. CHAT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PGR achieves a -3.79% return, which is significantly lower than CHAT's 42.01% return.
PGR
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- 0.60%
- 6M
- 1.22%
- YTD
- -3.79%
- 1Y
- -11.07%
- 3Y*
- 22.68%
- 5Y*
- 19.05%
- 10Y*
- 23.53%
CHAT
- 1D
- -5.30%
- 1M
- -12.49%
- 6M
- 36.21%
- YTD
- 42.01%
- 1Y
- 73.94%
- 3Y*
- 41.74%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PGR vs. CHAT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
PGR The Progressive Corporation | -3.79% | -3.02% | 51.39% | 16.78% |
CHAT Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF | 42.01% | 49.85% | 30.98% | 21.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between PGR and CHAT is -0.40, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.40 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2023 | -0.18 |
Over the past year, the inverse relationship between PGR and CHAT has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.18 to -0.40, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PGR vs. CHAT — Risk / Return Rank
PGR
CHAT
PGR vs. CHAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Progressive Corporation (PGR) and Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PGR | CHAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.84 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.32 | -0.38 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.56 | 3.80 | -4.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.95 | 11.13 | -12.08 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PGR vs. CHAT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PGR drawdown since its inception was -71.06%, which is greater than CHAT's maximum drawdown of -31.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PGR and CHAT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PGR | CHAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.06% | -31.34% | -39.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.79% | -19.54% | -0.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.35% | -31.34% | +0.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.35% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.35% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.68% | -19.54% | -5.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.55% | -5.52% | -9.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.66% | 6.67% | +4.99% |
Volatility
PGR vs. CHAT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for The Progressive Corporation (PGR) is 13.88%, while Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT) has a volatility of 16.90%. This indicates that PGR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CHAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PGR | CHAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.88% | 16.90% | -3.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.08% | 32.39% | -12.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.25% | 37.11% | -11.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.15% | 31.83% | -6.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.78% | 31.83% | -7.05% |
Dividends
PGR vs. CHAT - Dividend Comparison
PGR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.75%, more than CHAT's 2.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHAT Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF | 2.01% | 2.85% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PGR The Progressive Corporation | 6.75% | 2.15% | 0.48% | 0.25% | 0.31% | 6.23% | 2.68% | 3.89% | 1.86% | 1.21% | 2.50% | 2.16% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PGR and CHAT have a correlation of -0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CHAT has higher volatility (16.90%) compared to PGR (13.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PGR dropped -71.06% vs CHAT's -31.34%.
CHAT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs -0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PGR and CHAT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer