PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PGNAX vs. SRV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PGNAX vs. SRV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Jennison Natural Resources Fund (PGNAX) and NXG Cushing® Midstream Energy Fund (SRV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PGNAX achieves a 14.14% return, which is significantly lower than SRV's 29.09% return. Over the past 10 years, PGNAX has underperformed SRV with an annualized return of 10.07%, while SRV has yielded a comparatively higher 11.31% annualized return.


PGNAX

1D
-0.14%
1M
2.59%
6M
-3.69%
YTD
14.14%
1Y
42.26%
3Y*
14.88%
5Y*
16.03%
10Y*
10.07%
ALL TIME*
8.68%

SRV

1D
0.21%
1M
-3.19%
6M
20.97%
YTD
29.09%
1Y
29.79%
3Y*
21.47%
5Y*
27.31%
10Y*
11.31%
ALL TIME*
-0.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$3.37M$3.88M$3.11M

PGNAX vs. SRV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PGNAX
PGIM Jennison Natural Resources Fund
14.14%38.58%0.80%-2.22%24.40%27.22%11.22%16.50%-27.87%4.99%
SRV
NXG Cushing® Midstream Energy Fund
29.09%5.05%50.70%19.88%20.11%50.45%-41.65%33.99%-21.61%-4.21%

Correlation

The correlation between PGNAX and SRV is 0.21, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.34

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.50

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 27, 2007

0.47

Over the past year, the correlation between PGNAX and SRV has dropped to 0.21 - well below their long-term average of 0.47, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PGNAX vs. SRV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PGNAX
PGNAX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
PGNAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PGNAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
PGNAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
PGNAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
PGNAX Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

SRV
SRV Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
SRV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SRV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
SRV Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
SRV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
SRV Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PGNAX vs. SRV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Jennison Natural Resources Fund (PGNAX) and NXG Cushing® Midstream Energy Fund (SRV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PGNAXSRVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.26

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.56

2.28

+1.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.11

6.16

+2.95

PGNAX vs. SRV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PGNAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.97, which is higher than the SRV Sharpe Ratio of 1.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PGNAX and SRV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PGNAX vs. SRV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PGNAX drawdown since its inception was -76.46%, smaller than the maximum SRV drawdown of -92.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PGNAX and SRV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PGNAXSRVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.46%

-92.97%

+16.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.49%

-13.13%

+0.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.21%

-26.26%

+1.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.24%

-26.26%

-2.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.86%

-81.70%

+17.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.73%

-9.94%

+0.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.17%

-48.40%

+28.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.87%

4.85%

+0.02%

Volatility

PGNAX vs. SRV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PGIM Jennison Natural Resources Fund (PGNAX) is 5.81%, while NXG Cushing® Midstream Energy Fund (SRV) has a volatility of 9.19%. This indicates that PGNAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SRV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PGNAXSRVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.81%

9.19%

-3.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.27%

17.97%

-0.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.57%

21.43%

+1.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.27%

26.44%

-1.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.42%

38.35%

-11.93%

PGNAX vs. SRV - Expense Ratio Comparison

PGNAX has a 1.27% expense ratio, which is higher than SRV's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

PGNAX vs. SRV - Dividend Comparison

PGNAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.84%, less than SRV's 16.27% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PGNAX
PGIM Jennison Natural Resources Fund
0.84%0.96%0.98%1.93%2.75%0.84%1.32%1.78%1.59%0.00%1.15%0.00%
SRV
NXG Cushing® Midstream Energy Fund
16.27%19.31%12.85%15.56%8.85%4.72%12.05%10.59%12.73%9.07%7.95%11.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


PGNAX and SRV have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SRV has higher volatility (9.19%) compared to PGNAX (5.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PGNAX dropped -76.46% vs SRV's -92.97%.

PGNAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PGNAX and SRV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer