PGNAX vs. GGINX

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

PGNAX (PGIM Jennison Natural Resources Fund) and GGINX (Goldman Sachs Global Infrastructure Fund) are both Energy Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, PGNAX returned 14.11%/yr vs 10.62%/yr for GGINX. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PGNAX charges 1.27%/yr vs 1.10%/yr for GGINX.

Performance

PGNAX vs. GGINX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Jennison Natural Resources Fund (PGNAX) and Goldman Sachs Global Infrastructure Fund (GGINX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with PGNAX having a 11.62% return and GGINX slightly higher at 11.73%.

PGNAX

• 1D: -2.69%
• 1M: -9.22%
• YTD: 11.62%
• 6M: 10.42%
• 1Y: 40.31%
• 3Y*: 17.99%
• 5Y*: 14.11%
• 10Y*: 10.27%

GGINX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -1.37%
• YTD: 11.73%
• 6M: 12.07%
• 1Y: 16.13%
• 3Y*: 20.68%
• 5Y*: 10.62%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PGNAX vs. GGINX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PGNAX PGIM Jennison Natural Resources Fund	11.62%	38.58%	0.80%	-2.22%	24.40%	27.22%	11.22%	16.50%	-27.87%	4.99%
GGINX Goldman Sachs Global Infrastructure Fund	11.73%	15.18%	28.43%	5.00%	-8.51%	16.49%	-3.81%	31.50%	-8.99%	11.75%

Correlation

The correlation between PGNAX and GGINX is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.31
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.44
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.53
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017	0.53

Over the past year, the correlation between PGNAX and GGINX has dropped to 0.31 - well below their long-term average of 0.53, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

PGNAX vs. GGINX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PGNAX

PGNAX Risk / Return Rank: 61
PGNAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
PGNAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
PGNAX Omega Ratio Rank: 50
PGNAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
PGNAX Martin Ratio Rank: 75

GGINX

GGINX Risk / Return Rank: 43
GGINX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
GGINX Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
GGINX Omega Ratio Rank: 33
GGINX Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
GGINX Martin Ratio Rank: 42

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PGNAX vs. GGINX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Jennison Natural Resources Fund (PGNAX) and Goldman Sachs Global Infrastructure Fund (GGINX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PGNAX	GGINX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.81	1.43	+0.38
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.28	2.06	+0.22
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.25	+0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.41	2.77	+0.64
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.80	7.75	+4.05

PGNAX vs. GGINX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PGNAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is comparable to the GGINX Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PGNAX and GGINX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PGNAX vs. GGINX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PGNAX drawdown since its inception was -76.46%, which is greater than GGINX's maximum drawdown of -35.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PGNAX and GGINX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PGNAX	GGINX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-76.46%	-35.80%	-40.66%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.73%	-5.59%	-6.14%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.21%	-15.39%	-9.82%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.24%	-24.21%	-5.03%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-63.86%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.73%	-2.86%	-8.87%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-20.20%	-5.88%	-14.32%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.38%	1.99%	+1.39%

Volatility

PGNAX vs. GGINX - Volatility Comparison

PGIM Jennison Natural Resources Fund (PGNAX) has a higher volatility of 8.56% compared to Goldman Sachs Global Infrastructure Fund (GGINX) at 3.59%. This indicates that PGNAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GGINX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PGNAX	GGINX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.56%	3.59%	+4.97%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.15%	8.74%	+9.41%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.10%	10.84%	+11.26%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.40%	19.72%	+5.68%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.46%	18.96%	+7.50%

PGNAX vs. GGINX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PGNAX has a 1.27% expense ratio, which is higher than GGINX's 1.10% expense ratio.

Dividends

PGNAX vs. GGINX - Dividend Comparison

PGNAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.86%, less than GGINX's 6.00% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
GGINX Goldman Sachs Global Infrastructure Fund	6.00%	6.26%	30.25%	2.67%	0.89%	1.86%	1.75%	2.04%	1.98%	2.53%	0.00%
PGNAX PGIM Jennison Natural Resources Fund	0.86%	0.96%	0.98%	1.93%	2.75%	0.84%	1.32%	1.78%	1.59%	0.00%	1.15%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PGNAX and GGINX in my portfolio?

PGNAX and GGINX have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PGNAX or GGINX?

PGNAX has higher volatility (8.56%) compared to GGINX (3.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PGNAX dropped -76.46% vs GGINX's -35.80%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PGNAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.