GGINX vs. IGF

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

GGINX (Goldman Sachs Global Infrastructure Fund) and IGF (iShares Global Infrastructure ETF) are both funds - GGINX is a Energy Equities fund managed by Goldman Sachs, while IGF is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Infrastructure Index. Over the past 5 years, GGINX returned 10.30%/yr vs 10.42%/yr for IGF. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GGINX charges 1.10%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for IGF.

Performance

GGINX vs. IGF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Global Infrastructure Fund (GGINX) and iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GGINX achieves a 9.47% return, which is significantly higher than IGF's 8.67% return.

GGINX

• 1D: -0.91%
• 1M: -3.89%
• YTD: 9.47%
• 6M: 10.35%
• 1Y: 12.01%
• 3Y*: 19.40%
• 5Y*: 10.30%
• 10Y*: —

IGF

• 1D: 1.45%
• 1M: -2.14%
• YTD: 8.67%
• 6M: 8.66%
• 1Y: 15.53%
• 3Y*: 16.13%
• 5Y*: 10.42%
• 10Y*: 8.35%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GGINX vs. IGF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GGINX Goldman Sachs Global Infrastructure Fund	9.47%	15.18%	28.43%	5.00%	-8.51%	16.49%	-3.81%	31.50%	-8.99%	11.75%
IGF iShares Global Infrastructure ETF	8.67%	21.31%	14.81%	6.14%	-1.26%	11.57%	-6.50%	25.82%	-9.95%	18.85%

Correlation

The correlation between GGINX and IGF is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.80
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.84
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2017	0.88

The correlation between GGINX and IGF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

GGINX vs. IGF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GGINX

GGINX Risk / Return Rank: 25
GGINX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
GGINX Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
GGINX Omega Ratio Rank: 16
GGINX Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
GGINX Martin Ratio Rank: 33

IGF

IGF Risk / Return Rank: 46
IGF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
IGF Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
IGF Omega Ratio Rank: 41
IGF Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
IGF Martin Ratio Rank: 51

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GGINX vs. IGF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Global Infrastructure Fund (GGINX) and iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GGINX	IGF	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.23	1.49	-0.26
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.79	2.14	-0.34
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.27	-0.05
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.50	2.86	-0.36
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	7.54	8.91	-1.36
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GGINX vs. IGF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GGINX Sharpe Ratio is 1.23, which is comparable to the IGF Sharpe Ratio of 1.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GGINX and IGF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GGINX	IGF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.23	1.49	-0.26
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.53	0.75	-0.22
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.50	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.50	0.24	+0.26

Drawdowns

GGINX vs. IGF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GGINX drawdown since its inception was -35.80%, smaller than the maximum IGF drawdown of -58.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GGINX and IGF.

Drawdown Indicators

	GGINX	IGF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.80%	-58.33%	+22.53%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.59%	-5.87%	+0.28%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.39%	-14.28%	-1.11%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.21%	-20.83%	-3.38%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-42.11%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.82%	-3.88%	-0.94%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.90%	-11.87%	+5.97%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.85%	1.88%	-0.03%

Volatility

GGINX vs. IGF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs Global Infrastructure Fund (GGINX) is 3.48%, while iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF) has a volatility of 3.74%. This indicates that GGINX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IGF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GGINX	IGF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.48%	3.74%	-0.26%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.55%	8.61%	-0.06%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.70%	10.52%	+0.18%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.71%	13.99%	+5.72%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.00%	16.84%	+2.16%

GGINX vs. IGF - Expense Ratio Comparison

GGINX has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is higher than IGF's 0.39% expense ratio.

Dividends

GGINX vs. IGF - Dividend Comparison

GGINX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.12%, more than IGF's 2.97% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GGINX Goldman Sachs Global Infrastructure Fund	6.12%	6.26%	30.25%	2.67%	0.89%	1.86%	1.75%	2.04%	1.98%	2.53%	0.00%	0.00%
IGF iShares Global Infrastructure ETF	2.97%	3.23%	3.21%	3.36%	2.67%	2.42%	2.33%	3.27%	3.52%	2.95%	2.98%	3.25%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GGINX and IGF in my portfolio?

GGINX and IGF have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GGINX or IGF?

IGF has higher volatility (3.74%) compared to GGINX (3.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GGINX dropped -35.80% vs IGF's -58.33%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IGF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.49 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.