PortfoliosLab logo
GGINX vs. IGF
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between GGINX and IGF is 0.63, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

GGINX vs. IGF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Global Infrastructure Fund (GGINX) and iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

GGINX:

1.85

IGF:

1.67

Sortino Ratio

GGINX:

2.19

IGF:

2.06

Omega Ratio

GGINX:

1.33

IGF:

1.29

Calmar Ratio

GGINX:

2.50

IGF:

2.49

Martin Ratio

GGINX:

8.22

IGF:

9.50

Ulcer Index

GGINX:

2.89%

IGF:

2.29%

Daily Std Dev

GGINX:

14.06%

IGF:

14.36%

Max Drawdown

GGINX:

-35.80%

IGF:

-58.33%

Current Drawdown

GGINX:

-0.98%

IGF:

-0.68%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GGINX achieves a 10.94% return, which is significantly lower than IGF's 12.32% return.


GGINX

YTD

10.94%

1M

-0.60%

6M

4.74%

1Y

25.66%

3Y*

5.08%

5Y*

7.72%

10Y*

N/A

IGF

YTD

12.32%

1M

3.69%

6M

7.31%

1Y

23.70%

3Y*

7.70%

5Y*

11.59%

10Y*

6.27%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


iShares Global Infrastructure ETF

GGINX vs. IGF - Expense Ratio Comparison

GGINX has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is higher than IGF's 0.46% expense ratio.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

GGINX vs. IGF — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GGINX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of GGINX is 9090
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of GGINX is 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of GGINX is 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of GGINX is 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of GGINX is 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of GGINX is 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

IGF
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of IGF is 9191
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of IGF is 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of IGF is 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of IGF is 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of IGF is 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of IGF is 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

GGINX vs. IGF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Global Infrastructure Fund (GGINX) and iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current GGINX Sharpe Ratio is 1.85, which is comparable to the IGF Sharpe Ratio of 1.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GGINX and IGF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

GGINX vs. IGF - Dividend Comparison

GGINX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.85%, more than IGF's 2.86% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
GGINX
Goldman Sachs Global Infrastructure Fund
14.85%16.45%2.67%2.08%1.86%1.75%2.04%1.98%2.53%1.96%0.00%0.00%
IGF
iShares Global Infrastructure ETF
2.86%3.21%3.36%2.67%2.42%2.33%3.27%3.52%2.95%2.99%3.24%3.00%

Drawdowns

GGINX vs. IGF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GGINX drawdown since its inception was -35.80%, smaller than the maximum IGF drawdown of -58.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GGINX and IGF.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

GGINX vs. IGF - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs Global Infrastructure Fund (GGINX) has a higher volatility of 3.90% compared to iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF) at 3.49%. This indicates that GGINX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IGF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...