PGJ vs. FXP
PGJ (Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF) and FXP (ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50) are both exchange-traded funds - PGJ is a China Equities fund tracking the Halter USX China Index, while FXP is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the FTSE China 50 Net Tax USD (TR) (-200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PGJ returned 0.39%/yr vs -23.04%/yr for FXP. At a correlation of -0.81, they often move in opposite directions. PGJ charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for FXP.
Performance
PGJ vs. FXP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PGJ achieves a -10.99% return, which is significantly lower than FXP's 13.64% return. Over the past 10 years, PGJ has outperformed FXP with an annualized return of 0.39%, while FXP has yielded a comparatively lower -23.04% annualized return.
PGJ
- 1D
- -2.45%
- 1M
- -3.45%
- YTD
- -10.99%
- 6M
- -12.93%
- 1Y
- -4.61%
- 3Y*
- 3.00%
- 5Y*
- -13.64%
- 10Y*
- 0.39%
FXP
- 1D
- 4.65%
- 1M
- 5.53%
- YTD
- 13.64%
- 6M
- 16.82%
- 1Y
- -6.43%
- 3Y*
- -30.22%
- 5Y*
- -16.52%
- 10Y*
- -23.04%
PGJ vs. FXP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PGJ Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF | -10.99% | 13.66% | 5.91% | -2.38% | -24.50% | -42.87% | 54.24% | 32.18% | -29.51% | 60.27% |
FXP ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50 | 13.64% | -45.32% | -52.46% | 12.74% | -11.73% | 23.56% | -39.47% | -29.01% | 12.45% | -49.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between PGJ and FXP is -0.83, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.83 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.88 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.89 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2007 | -0.81 |
The correlation between PGJ and FXP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.89 to -0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PGJ vs. FXP — Risk / Return Rank
PGJ
FXP
PGJ vs. FXP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF (PGJ) and ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50 (FXP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PGJ | FXP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.00 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.18 | -0.24 | +0.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.34 | -0.40 | +0.05 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PGJ | FXP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.19 | -0.16 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.31 | -0.26 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.01 | -0.42 | +0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.12 | -0.44 | +0.56 |
Drawdowns
PGJ vs. FXP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PGJ drawdown since its inception was -78.37%, smaller than the maximum FXP drawdown of -99.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PGJ and FXP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PGJ | FXP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.37% | -99.94% | +21.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.69% | -27.21% | +1.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.82% | -82.34% | +51.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -70.00% | -87.85% | +17.85% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -78.37% | -94.71% | +16.34% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -66.07% | -99.92% | +33.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.74% | -94.15% | +62.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.40% | 17.66% | -4.26% |
Volatility
PGJ vs. FXP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF (PGJ) is 8.55%, while ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50 (FXP) has a volatility of 15.06%. This indicates that PGJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FXP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PGJ | FXP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.55% | 15.06% | -6.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.28% | 28.87% | -11.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.46% | 39.29% | -14.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.73% | 63.12% | -19.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.70% | 54.91% | -18.21% |
PGJ vs. FXP - Expense Ratio Comparison
PGJ has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than FXP's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
PGJ vs. FXP - Dividend Comparison
PGJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.56%, less than FXP's 4.12% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FXP ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50 | 4.12% | 9.57% | 3.55% | 2.20% | 0.06% | 0.00% | 0.06% | 1.20% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PGJ Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF | 3.56% | 3.38% | 4.70% | 2.50% | 0.84% | 0.00% | 0.30% | 0.17% | 0.31% | 2.05% | 1.94% | 0.37% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PGJ and FXP have a correlation of -0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FXP has higher volatility (15.06%) compared to PGJ (8.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PGJ dropped -78.37% vs FXP's -99.94%.
On 10-year performance, PGJ leads with 0.39% vs -23.04% for FXP. On fees, PGJ is cheaper at 0.70% per year. On volatility, PGJ has been the lower-risk option at 8.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, PGJ has performed better with a 0.39% return vs -23.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PGJ is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for FXP.
FXP has the higher dividend yield at 4.12%, compared with 3.56% for PGJ.
PGJ is categorized as China Equities, while FXP is Leveraged Equities. PGJ tracks Halter USX China Index, while FXP tracks FTSE China 50 Net Tax USD (TR) (-200%). They also come from different issuers: Invesco and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for PGJ and 0.95% for FXP.
FXP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.16 vs -0.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PGJ and FXP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer