PGJ vs. FXI
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF (PGJ) and iShares China Large-Cap ETF (FXI).
PGJ and FXI are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. PGJ is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the Halter USX China Index. It was launched on Dec 9, 2004. FXI is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the FTSE China 25 Index. It was launched on Oct 5, 2004. Both PGJ and FXI are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: PGJ or FXI.
Correlation
The correlation between PGJ and FXI is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
PGJ vs. FXI - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
PGJ:
0.31
FXI:
0.94
PGJ:
0.75
FXI:
1.56
PGJ:
1.09
FXI:
1.19
PGJ:
0.15
FXI:
0.54
PGJ:
0.88
FXI:
3.32
PGJ:
12.70%
FXI:
9.47%
PGJ:
35.63%
FXI:
33.59%
PGJ:
-78.37%
FXI:
-72.68%
PGJ:
-66.36%
FXI:
-39.72%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PGJ achieves a 6.21% return, which is significantly lower than FXI's 27.33% return. Over the past 10 years, PGJ has outperformed FXI with an annualized return of 0.63%, while FXI has yielded a comparatively lower -0.50% annualized return.
PGJ
6.21%
2.57%
13.40%
8.97%
-7.09%
0.63%
FXI
27.33%
-0.72%
14.83%
29.69%
-4.86%
-0.50%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PGJ vs. FXI - Expense Ratio Comparison
PGJ has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than FXI's 0.74% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
PGJ vs. FXI - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF (PGJ) and iShares China Large-Cap ETF (FXI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
PGJ vs. FXI - Dividend Comparison
PGJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.43%, more than FXI's 3.80% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PGJ Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF | 4.43% | 2.50% | 0.84% | 0.00% | 0.31% | 0.17% | 0.31% | 2.05% | 1.94% | 0.37% | 0.89% | 0.96% |
FXI iShares China Large-Cap ETF | 3.80% | 3.17% | 2.61% | 1.60% | 2.19% | 2.74% | 2.69% | 2.31% | 2.69% | 2.90% | 2.51% | 2.64% |
Drawdowns
PGJ vs. FXI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PGJ drawdown since its inception was -78.37%, which is greater than FXI's maximum drawdown of -72.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PGJ and FXI. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
PGJ vs. FXI - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF (PGJ) has a higher volatility of 11.59% compared to iShares China Large-Cap ETF (FXI) at 10.90%. This indicates that PGJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FXI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.