PGINX vs. PAXBX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

PGINX (Impax Global Environmental Markets Fund Institutional Class) and PAXBX (PAX CORE BOND FUND) are both mutual funds - PGINX is a Global Equities fund managed by Pax World, while PAXBX is a Intermediate Core Bond fund managed by Pax World. Over the past 5 years, PGINX returned 7.02%/yr vs -0.49%/yr for PAXBX. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PGINX charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.71%/yr for PAXBX.

Performance

PGINX vs. PAXBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Impax Global Environmental Markets Fund Institutional Class (PGINX) and PAX CORE BOND FUND (PAXBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PGINX achieves a 17.82% return, which is significantly higher than PAXBX's 0.09% return.

PGINX

• 1D: 0.12%
• 1M: 6.18%
• YTD: 17.82%
• 6M: 17.45%
• 1Y: 25.19%
• 3Y*: 15.19%
• 5Y*: 7.02%
• 10Y*: 11.19%

PAXBX

• 1D: -0.23%
• 1M: 0.09%
• YTD: 0.09%
• 6M: 0.17%
• 1Y: 4.23%
• 3Y*: 3.36%
• 5Y*: -0.49%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PGINX vs. PAXBX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PGINX Impax Global Environmental Markets Fund Institutional Class	17.82%	14.14%	5.15%	16.85%	-22.39%	22.25%	26.00%	28.18%	-14.20%	26.80%
PAXBX PAX CORE BOND FUND	0.09%	6.45%	1.04%	4.60%	-13.60%	-1.85%	6.92%	8.01%	-0.24%	2.57%

Correlation

The correlation between PGINX and PAXBX is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.34
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.28
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.23
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2016	0.07

Over the past year, PGINX and PAXBX have become more correlated (0.34) than their long-term average of 0.07, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Return for Risk

PGINX vs. PAXBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PGINX

PGINX Risk / Return Rank: 36
PGINX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
PGINX Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
PGINX Omega Ratio Rank: 33
PGINX Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
PGINX Martin Ratio Rank: 38

PAXBX

PAXBX Risk / Return Rank: 20
PAXBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
PAXBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
PAXBX Omega Ratio Rank: 18
PAXBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
PAXBX Martin Ratio Rank: 20

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PGINX vs. PAXBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Impax Global Environmental Markets Fund Institutional Class (PGINX) and PAX CORE BOND FUND (PAXBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PGINX	PAXBX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.71	1.25	+0.47
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.43	1.87	+0.56
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.22	+0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.27	1.65	+0.61
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.32	5.05	+3.27
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PGINX vs. PAXBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PGINX Sharpe Ratio is 1.71, which is higher than the PAXBX Sharpe Ratio of 1.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PGINX and PAXBX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PGINX	PAXBX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.71	1.25	+0.47
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.39	-0.09	+0.47
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.62	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.40	0.29	+0.11

Drawdowns

PGINX vs. PAXBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PGINX drawdown since its inception was -52.48%, which is greater than PAXBX's maximum drawdown of -18.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PGINX and PAXBX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PGINX	PAXBX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-52.48%	-18.88%	-33.60%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.49%	-2.94%	-8.55%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.57%	-6.24%	-13.33%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-33.54%	-18.30%	-15.24%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.54%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-4.88%	+4.88%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.57%	-5.72%	-3.85%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.12%	0.96%	+2.16%

Volatility

PGINX vs. PAXBX - Volatility Comparison

Impax Global Environmental Markets Fund Institutional Class (PGINX) has a higher volatility of 5.45% compared to PAX CORE BOND FUND (PAXBX) at 1.37%. This indicates that PGINX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PAXBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PGINX	PAXBX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.45%	1.37%	+4.08%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.44%	2.76%	+9.68%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.22%	3.89%	+11.33%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.27%	5.74%	+12.53%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.17%	4.81%	+13.36%

PGINX vs. PAXBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PGINX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than PAXBX's 0.71% expense ratio.

Dividends

PGINX vs. PAXBX - Dividend Comparison

PGINX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.12%, more than PAXBX's 3.84% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PAXBX PAX CORE BOND FUND	3.84%	3.72%	3.22%	2.18%	1.69%	1.51%	4.14%	2.59%	2.37%	2.24%	0.07%	0.00%
PGINX Impax Global Environmental Markets Fund Institutional Class	20.12%	23.71%	4.79%	0.74%	0.65%	2.10%	0.60%	0.86%	4.26%	3.44%	0.75%	1.13%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PGINX and PAXBX in my portfolio?

PGINX and PAXBX have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PGINX or PAXBX?

PGINX has higher volatility (5.45%) compared to PAXBX (1.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PGINX dropped -52.48% vs PAXBX's -18.88%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PGINX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.71 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.