PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PAXBX vs. PAXGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PAXBX vs. PAXGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PAX CORE BOND FUND (PAXBX) and Pax Global Opportunities Fund (PAXGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PAXBX achieves a -0.82% return, which is significantly lower than PAXGX's 5.84% return.


PAXBX

1D
0.00%
1M
-1.25%
6M
-1.01%
YTD
-0.82%
1Y
1.51%
3Y*
3.11%
5Y*
-0.98%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
1.26%

PAXGX

1D
2.15%
1M
0.29%
6M
5.77%
YTD
5.84%
1Y
6.53%
3Y*
7.56%
5Y*
3.96%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
9.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

PAXBX vs. PAXGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
PAXBX
PAX CORE BOND FUND
-0.82%6.45%1.04%4.60%-13.60%-1.85%6.92%8.01%1.64%
PAXGX
Pax Global Opportunities Fund
5.84%9.48%6.16%15.16%-18.86%18.71%22.76%33.52%-8.20%

Correlation

The correlation between PAXBX and PAXGX is 0.38, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.29

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2018

0.11

Over the past year, PAXBX and PAXGX have become more correlated (0.38) than their long-term average of 0.11, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PAXBX vs. PAXGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PAXBX
PAXBX Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
PAXBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PAXBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
PAXBX Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
PAXBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
PAXBX Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

PAXGX
PAXGX Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
PAXGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PAXGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
PAXGX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
PAXGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
PAXGX Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PAXBX vs. PAXGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PAX CORE BOND FUND (PAXBX) and Pax Global Opportunities Fund (PAXGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PAXBXPAXGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.07

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.90

0.42

+0.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.25

1.43

+0.82

PAXBX vs. PAXGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PAXBX Sharpe Ratio is 0.71, which is higher than the PAXGX Sharpe Ratio of 0.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PAXBX and PAXGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PAXBX vs. PAXGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PAXBX drawdown since its inception was -18.88%, smaller than the maximum PAXGX drawdown of -30.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAXBX and PAXGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PAXBXPAXGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.88%

-30.63%

+11.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.94%

-12.28%

+9.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.18%

-19.35%

+14.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.30%

-30.37%

+12.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.74%

-0.17%

-5.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.71%

-6.45%

+0.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.17%

3.62%

-2.45%

Volatility

PAXBX vs. PAXGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PAX CORE BOND FUND (PAXBX) is 1.02%, while Pax Global Opportunities Fund (PAXGX) has a volatility of 3.86%. This indicates that PAXBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PAXGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PAXBXPAXGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.02%

3.86%

-2.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.93%

11.94%

-9.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.75%

14.28%

-10.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.75%

16.91%

-11.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.80%

18.37%

-13.57%

PAXBX vs. PAXGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PAXBX has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is lower than PAXGX's 1.21% expense ratio.


Dividends

PAXBX vs. PAXGX - Dividend Comparison

PAXBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.64%, less than PAXGX's 6.54% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
PAXBX
PAX CORE BOND FUND
3.64%3.72%3.22%2.18%1.69%1.51%4.14%2.59%2.37%2.24%0.07%
PAXGX
Pax Global Opportunities Fund
6.54%6.87%2.82%0.21%1.30%1.79%0.80%1.77%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PAXBX and PAXGX have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PAXGX has higher volatility (3.86%) compared to PAXBX (1.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PAXBX dropped -18.88% vs PAXGX's -30.63%.

PAXBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.71 vs 0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PAXBX and PAXGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer