PAXBX vs. PAXLX
PAXBX (PAX CORE BOND FUND) and PAXLX (PAX LARGE CAP FUND) are both mutual funds - PAXBX is a Intermediate Core Bond fund managed by Pax World, while PAXLX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Pax World. Over the past 5 years, PAXBX returned -0.41%/yr vs 7.38%/yr for PAXLX. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PAXBX charges 0.71%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for PAXLX.
Performance
PAXBX vs. PAXLX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PAXBX achieves a 0.32% return, which is significantly lower than PAXLX's 4.72% return.
PAXBX
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 0.21%
- YTD
- 0.32%
- 6M
- 0.40%
- 1Y
- 5.07%
- 3Y*
- 3.44%
- 5Y*
- -0.41%
- 10Y*
- —
PAXLX
- 1D
- 0.70%
- 1M
- 3.41%
- YTD
- 4.72%
- 6M
- 4.39%
- 1Y
- 17.83%
- 3Y*
- 14.26%
- 5Y*
- 7.38%
- 10Y*
- —
PAXBX vs. PAXLX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PAXBX PAX CORE BOND FUND | 0.32% | 6.45% | 1.04% | 4.60% | -13.60% | -1.85% | 6.92% | 8.01% | -0.24% | 2.57% |
PAXLX PAX LARGE CAP FUND | 4.72% | 12.17% | 13.96% | 19.96% | -20.01% | 30.64% | 23.75% | 34.88% | -5.38% | 20.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between PAXBX and PAXLX is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2016 | 0.02 |
Over the past year, PAXBX and PAXLX have become more correlated (0.26) than their long-term average of 0.02, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PAXBX vs. PAXLX — Risk / Return Rank
PAXBX
PAXLX
PAXBX vs. PAXLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PAX CORE BOND FUND (PAXBX) and PAX LARGE CAP FUND (PAXLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PAXBX | PAXLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.21 | 1.53 | -0.32 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.82 | 2.13 | -0.31 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.27 | -0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.79 | 1.37 | +0.42 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.55 | 4.97 | +0.58 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PAXBX | PAXLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.21 | 1.53 | -0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.07 | 0.38 | -0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.29 | 0.67 | -0.37 |
Drawdowns
PAXBX vs. PAXLX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PAXBX drawdown since its inception was -18.88%, smaller than the maximum PAXLX drawdown of -32.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAXBX and PAXLX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PAXBX | PAXLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.88% | -32.73% | +13.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.94% | -13.12% | +10.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.24% | -28.48% | +22.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.30% | -28.48% | +10.18% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.66% | 0.00% | -4.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.72% | -6.20% | +0.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.95% | 3.62% | -2.67% |
Volatility
PAXBX vs. PAXLX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for PAX CORE BOND FUND (PAXBX) is 1.39%, while PAX LARGE CAP FUND (PAXLX) has a volatility of 3.11%. This indicates that PAXBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PAXLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PAXBX | PAXLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.39% | 3.11% | -1.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.77% | 8.98% | -6.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.91% | 11.80% | -7.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.74% | 19.50% | -13.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.82% | 19.57% | -14.75% |
PAXBX vs. PAXLX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PAXBX has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is lower than PAXLX's 0.97% expense ratio.
Dividends
PAXBX vs. PAXLX - Dividend Comparison
PAXBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.83%, less than PAXLX's 28.06% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PAXBX PAX CORE BOND FUND | 3.83% | 3.72% | 3.22% | 2.18% | 1.69% | 1.51% | 4.14% | 2.59% | 2.37% | 2.24% | 0.07% |
PAXLX PAX LARGE CAP FUND | 28.06% | 29.38% | 18.38% | 4.28% | 2.92% | 5.80% | 6.67% | 3.49% | 25.45% | 13.18% | 0.07% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PAXBX and PAXLX have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PAXLX has higher volatility (3.11%) compared to PAXBX (1.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PAXBX dropped -18.88% vs PAXLX's -32.73%.
PAXLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.53 vs 1.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PAXBX and PAXLX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer