PGIIX vs. LVAFX
PGIIX (Polen Global Growth Fund) and LVAFX (LSV Global Managed Volatility Fund) are both Global Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, PGIIX returned 10.33%/yr vs 7.88%/yr for LVAFX. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PGIIX charges 0.99%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for LVAFX.
Performance
PGIIX vs. LVAFX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PGIIX achieves a -5.89% return, which is significantly lower than LVAFX's 12.33% return. Over the past 10 years, PGIIX has outperformed LVAFX with an annualized return of 10.33%, while LVAFX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.88% annualized return.
PGIIX
- 1D
- 0.58%
- 1M
- 2.35%
- 6M
- -7.19%
- YTD
- -5.89%
- 1Y
- -5.52%
- 3Y*
- 6.81%
- 5Y*
- 0.71%
- 10Y*
- 10.33%
LVAFX
- 1D
- 0.40%
- 1M
- -1.41%
- 6M
- 11.04%
- YTD
- 12.33%
- 1Y
- 22.79%
- 3Y*
- 13.60%
- 5Y*
- 8.27%
- 10Y*
- 7.88%
PGIIX vs. LVAFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PGIIX Polen Global Growth Fund | -5.89% | 1.91% | 16.43% | 31.09% | -31.20% | 17.43% | 23.67% | 35.47% | 2.48% | 31.52% |
LVAFX LSV Global Managed Volatility Fund | 12.33% | 22.33% | 0.10% | 9.81% | -4.04% | 17.36% | -5.16% | 17.54% | -6.47% | 18.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between PGIIX and LVAFX is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2015 | 0.65 |
Over the past year, the correlation between PGIIX and LVAFX has dropped to 0.44 - well below their long-term average of 0.65, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PGIIX vs. LVAFX — Risk / Return Rank
PGIIX
LVAFX
PGIIX vs. LVAFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Polen Global Growth Fund (PGIIX) and LSV Global Managed Volatility Fund (LVAFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PGIIX | LVAFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.47 | -0.53 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.33 | 3.88 | -4.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.75 | 13.42 | -14.17 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PGIIX vs. LVAFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PGIIX drawdown since its inception was -37.09%, which is greater than LVAFX's maximum drawdown of -33.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PGIIX and LVAFX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PGIIX | LVAFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.09% | -33.69% | -3.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.38% | -5.76% | -16.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.38% | -17.52% | -4.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.09% | -18.34% | -18.75% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.09% | -33.69% | -3.40% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.98% | -1.41% | -9.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.08% | -4.73% | -2.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.68% | 1.66% | +8.02% |
Volatility
PGIIX vs. LVAFX - Volatility Comparison
Polen Global Growth Fund (PGIIX) has a higher volatility of 5.34% compared to LSV Global Managed Volatility Fund (LVAFX) at 2.87%. This indicates that PGIIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LVAFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PGIIX | LVAFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.34% | 2.87% | +2.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.50% | 6.60% | +6.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.49% | 8.67% | +7.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.75% | 13.24% | +6.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.27% | 13.52% | +5.75% |
PGIIX vs. LVAFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PGIIX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than LVAFX's 1.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
PGIIX vs. LVAFX - Dividend Comparison
PGIIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 22.97%, more than LVAFX's 9.06% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LVAFX LSV Global Managed Volatility Fund | 9.06% | 10.17% | 2.71% | 15.64% | 2.90% | 2.90% | 2.14% | 7.62% | 3.59% | 7.10% | 1.66% | 1.74% |
PGIIX Polen Global Growth Fund | 22.97% | 21.62% | 7.45% | 0.00% | 1.15% | 2.48% | 0.00% | 0.04% | 1.93% | 0.00% | 0.05% | 0.09% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PGIIX and LVAFX have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PGIIX has higher volatility (5.34%) compared to LVAFX (2.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PGIIX dropped -37.09% vs LVAFX's -33.69%.
LVAFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.58 vs -0.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PGIIX and LVAFX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer