PGHY vs. TBUX
PGHY (Invesco Global Short Term High Yield Bond ETF) and TBUX (T. Rowe Price Ultra Short-Term Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PGHY is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the DB Global Short Maturity High Yield Bond Index, while TBUX is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by T. Rowe Price. PGHY is passively managed, while TBUX is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, PGHY returned 8.64%/yr vs 5.85%/yr for TBUX. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PGHY charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for TBUX.
Performance
PGHY vs. TBUX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PGHY achieves a 2.18% return, which is significantly higher than TBUX's 1.69% return.
PGHY
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- -0.40%
- YTD
- 2.18%
- 6M
- 2.62%
- 1Y
- 7.49%
- 3Y*
- 8.64%
- 5Y*
- 4.49%
- 10Y*
- 4.32%
TBUX
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 0.29%
- YTD
- 1.69%
- 6M
- 2.08%
- 1Y
- 4.88%
- 3Y*
- 5.85%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PGHY vs. TBUX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PGHY Invesco Global Short Term High Yield Bond ETF | 2.18% | 8.88% | 8.39% | 10.15% | -5.50% | -0.54% |
TBUX T. Rowe Price Ultra Short-Term Bond ETF | 1.69% | 5.37% | 6.38% | 6.39% | -0.13% | -0.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between PGHY and TBUX is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2021 | 0.22 |
The correlation between PGHY and TBUX shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (3 years) to 0.31 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
PGHY vs. TBUX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PGHY
TBUX
Financial Services
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Industrials
Healthcare
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Technology
Real Estate
Financial Services
PGHY
TBUX
Communication Services
PGHY
TBUX
Basic Materials
PGHY
TBUX
Consumer Cyclical
PGHY
TBUX
Energy
PGHY
TBUX
Industrials
PGHY
TBUX
Healthcare
PGHY
TBUX
Utilities
PGHY
TBUX
Consumer Defensive
PGHY
TBUX
Technology
PGHY
TBUX
Real Estate
PGHY
TBUX
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PGHY vs. TBUX — Risk / Return Rank
PGHY
TBUX
PGHY vs. TBUX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Global Short Term High Yield Bond ETF (PGHY) and T. Rowe Price Ultra Short-Term Bond ETF (TBUX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PGHY | TBUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -5.78 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -12.43 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 3.15 | -1.88 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.48 | 48.80 | -46.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.56 | 185.24 | -175.68 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PGHY | TBUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.49 | 7.27 | -5.78 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.60 | 3.88 | -3.28 |
Drawdowns
PGHY vs. TBUX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PGHY drawdown since its inception was -20.50%, which is greater than TBUX's maximum drawdown of -1.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PGHY and TBUX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PGHY | TBUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.50% | -1.79% | -18.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.04% | -0.10% | -2.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.03% | -0.33% | -4.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -9.42% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -20.50% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.80% | -0.04% | -0.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.64% | -0.28% | -1.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.79% | 0.03% | +0.76% |
Volatility
PGHY vs. TBUX - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Global Short Term High Yield Bond ETF (PGHY) has a higher volatility of 2.00% compared to T. Rowe Price Ultra Short-Term Bond ETF (TBUX) at 0.22%. This indicates that PGHY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TBUX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PGHY | TBUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.00% | 0.22% | +1.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.73% | 0.46% | +3.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.06% | 0.67% | +4.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.45% | 1.07% | +4.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.04% | 1.07% | +5.97% |
PGHY vs. TBUX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PGHY has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than TBUX's 0.17% expense ratio.
Dividends
PGHY vs. TBUX - Dividend Comparison
PGHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.11%, more than TBUX's 4.48% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PGHY Invesco Global Short Term High Yield Bond ETF | 7.11% | 7.24% | 7.49% | 7.87% | 5.12% | 5.17% | 5.45% | 5.32% | 5.45% | 5.52% | 6.26% | 4.60% |
TBUX T. Rowe Price Ultra Short-Term Bond ETF | 4.48% | 4.67% | 5.39% | 4.66% | 2.58% | 0.27% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PGHY and TBUX have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PGHY has higher volatility (2.00%) compared to TBUX (0.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PGHY dropped -20.50% vs TBUX's -1.79%.
On 3-year performance, PGHY leads with 8.64% vs 5.85% for TBUX. On fees, TBUX is cheaper at 0.17% per year. On volatility, TBUX has been the lower-risk option at 0.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, PGHY has performed better with a 8.64% return vs 5.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TBUX is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for PGHY.
PGHY has the higher dividend yield at 7.11%, compared with 4.48% for TBUX.
PGHY is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while TBUX is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and T. Rowe Price. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for PGHY and 0.17% for TBUX.
TBUX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (7.27 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PGHY and TBUX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer