PGHY vs. SCYB
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco Global Short Term High Yield Bond ETF (PGHY) and Schwab High Yield Bond ETF (SCYB).
PGHY and SCYB are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. PGHY is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the DB Global Short Maturity High Yield Bond Index. It was launched on Jun 20, 2013. SCYB is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the ICE BofA US Cash Pay High Yield Constrained Index. It was launched on Jul 10, 2023. Both PGHY and SCYB are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
PGHY vs. SCYB - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PGHY vs. SCYB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
PGHY Invesco Global Short Term High Yield Bond ETF | 0.48% | 8.88% | 8.39% | 5.47% |
SCYB Schwab High Yield Bond ETF | 0.13% | 8.33% | 8.15% | 6.74% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PGHY achieves a 0.48% return, which is significantly higher than SCYB's 0.13% return.
PGHY
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- -0.39%
- YTD
- 0.48%
- 6M
- 1.92%
- 1Y
- 6.66%
- 3Y*
- 8.72%
- 5Y*
- 4.34%
- 10Y*
- 4.55%
SCYB
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- -0.36%
- YTD
- 0.13%
- 6M
- 1.18%
- 1Y
- 7.00%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PGHY vs. SCYB - Expense Ratio Comparison
PGHY has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than SCYB's 0.03% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PGHY vs. SCYB — Risk / Return Rank
PGHY
SCYB
PGHY vs. SCYB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Global Short Term High Yield Bond ETF (PGHY) and Schwab High Yield Bond ETF (SCYB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PGHY | SCYB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.11 | 1.24 | -0.12 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.64 | 1.82 | -0.18 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.29 | -0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.51 | 1.72 | -0.21 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.65 | 9.00 | -2.35 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PGHY | SCYB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.11 | 1.24 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.65 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.59 | 1.66 | -1.07 |
Correlation
The correlation between PGHY and SCYB is 0.56, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
PGHY vs. SCYB - Dividend Comparison
PGHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.16%, more than SCYB's 7.05% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PGHY Invesco Global Short Term High Yield Bond ETF | 7.16% | 7.24% | 7.49% | 7.87% | 5.12% | 5.17% | 5.45% | 5.32% | 5.45% | 5.52% | 6.26% | 4.60% |
SCYB Schwab High Yield Bond ETF | 7.05% | 6.99% | 7.06% | 3.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
PGHY vs. SCYB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PGHY drawdown since its inception was -20.50%, which is greater than SCYB's maximum drawdown of -4.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PGHY and SCYB.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PGHY | SCYB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.50% | -4.92% | -15.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.57% | -3.14% | -0.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -9.42% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -20.50% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.33% | -0.91% | -0.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.66% | -0.53% | -1.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.98% | 0.81% | +0.17% |
Volatility
PGHY vs. SCYB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Global Short Term High Yield Bond ETF (PGHY) is 2.08%, while Schwab High Yield Bond ETF (SCYB) has a volatility of 2.27%. This indicates that PGHY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCYB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PGHY | SCYB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.08% | 2.27% | -0.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.39% | 2.94% | +0.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.01% | 5.68% | +0.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.33% | 5.20% | +0.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.03% | 5.20% | +1.83% |