PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PGHY vs. ^GSPC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

PGHY vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Global Short Term High Yield Bond ETF (PGHY) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PGHY achieves a 2.49% return, which is significantly lower than ^GSPC's 8.56% return. Over the past 10 years, PGHY has underperformed ^GSPC with an annualized return of 4.39%, while ^GSPC has yielded a comparatively higher 13.61% annualized return.


PGHY

1D
-0.15%
1M
0.18%
YTD
2.49%
6M
2.88%
1Y
7.65%
3Y*
8.84%
5Y*
4.53%
10Y*
4.39%

^GSPC

1D
0.50%
1M
-0.93%
YTD
8.56%
6M
8.85%
1Y
24.33%
3Y*
19.37%
5Y*
11.84%
10Y*
13.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PGHY vs. ^GSPC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PGHY
Invesco Global Short Term High Yield Bond ETF
2.49%8.88%8.39%10.15%-5.50%1.22%3.04%5.87%0.38%2.97%
^GSPC
S&P 500 Index
8.56%16.39%23.31%24.23%-19.44%26.89%16.26%28.88%-6.24%19.42%

Correlation

The correlation between PGHY and ^GSPC is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.40

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2013

0.30

The correlation between PGHY and ^GSPC shifts across timeframes, from 0.30 (all time) to 0.43 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PGHY vs. ^GSPC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PGHY
PGHY Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
PGHY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PGHY Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
PGHY Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
PGHY Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
PGHY Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

^GSPC
^GSPC Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
^GSPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^GSPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
^GSPC Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
^GSPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
^GSPC Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PGHY vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Global Short Term High Yield Bond ETF (PGHY) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PGHY^GSPCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.34

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.46

2.53

-0.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.42

11.37

-1.95

PGHY vs. ^GSPC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PGHY Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is comparable to the ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio of 1.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PGHY and ^GSPC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PGHY vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PGHY drawdown since its inception was -20.50%, smaller than the maximum ^GSPC drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PGHY and ^GSPC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PGHY^GSPCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.50%

-56.78%

+36.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.04%

-9.10%

+6.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.03%

-18.90%

+13.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.42%

-25.43%

+16.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.50%

-33.92%

+13.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.50%

-2.34%

+1.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.64%

-10.72%

+9.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.79%

2.02%

-1.23%

Volatility

PGHY vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Global Short Term High Yield Bond ETF (PGHY) is 2.06%, while S&P 500 Index (^GSPC) has a volatility of 4.43%. This indicates that PGHY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PGHY^GSPCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.06%

4.43%

-2.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.81%

9.70%

-5.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.11%

12.38%

-7.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.46%

16.97%

-11.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.04%

18.09%

-11.05%

Frequently Asked Questions


PGHY and ^GSPC have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

^GSPC has higher volatility (4.43%) compared to PGHY (2.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PGHY dropped -20.50% vs ^GSPC's -56.78%.

^GSPC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PGHY and ^GSPC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer