PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PG vs. SUN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

PG vs. SUN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) and Sunoco LP (SUN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PG achieves a 5.93% return, which is significantly lower than SUN's 28.53% return. Over the past 10 years, PG has underperformed SUN with an annualized return of 8.96%, while SUN has yielded a comparatively higher 18.66% annualized return.


PG

1D
0.86%
1M
5.18%
YTD
5.93%
6M
6.28%
1Y
-5.68%
3Y*
3.69%
5Y*
4.73%
10Y*
8.96%

SUN

1D
1.57%
1M
-6.67%
YTD
28.53%
6M
25.21%
1Y
29.03%
3Y*
21.16%
5Y*
19.32%
10Y*
18.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PG vs. SUN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PG
The Procter & Gamble Company
5.93%-12.26%17.25%-0.86%-5.05%20.52%14.15%39.70%3.57%12.69%
SUN
Sunoco LP
28.53%8.88%-8.59%49.38%13.95%55.26%6.28%24.78%7.71%17.86%

Correlation

The correlation between PG and SUN is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.06

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 20, 2012

0.11

The correlation between PG and SUN shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (1 year) to 0.11 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PG:

$361.53B

SUN:

$3.37T

EPS

PG:

$5.23

SUN:

$0.06

PE Ratio

PG:

28.63

SUN:

1.02K

PS Ratio

PG:

4.20

SUN:

42.37

PB Ratio

PG:

6.70

SUN:

1.30K

Total Revenue (TTM)

PG:

$86.72B

SUN:

$20.02B

Gross Profit (TTM)

PG:

$43.64B

SUN:

$1.75B

EBITDA (TTM)

PG:

$22.63B

SUN:

$2.10B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PG vs. SUN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PG
PG Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
PG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
PG Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
PG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
PG Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

SUN
SUN Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
SUN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SUN Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
SUN Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
SUN Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
SUN Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PG vs. SUN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) and Sunoco LP (SUN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PGSUNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.97

1.21

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.37

2.64

-3.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.68

6.54

-7.22

PG vs. SUN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PG Sharpe Ratio is -0.30, which is lower than the SUN Sharpe Ratio of 1.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PG and SUN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PG vs. SUN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PG drawdown since its inception was -54.25%, smaller than the maximum SUN drawdown of -65.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PG and SUN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PGSUNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.25%

-65.47%

+11.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.52%

-11.05%

-4.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.15%

-21.29%

+0.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.77%

-21.29%

-2.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.77%

-62.94%

+39.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.29%

-9.53%

-3.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.16%

-16.30%

+4.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.80%

4.47%

+4.33%

Volatility

PG vs. SUN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) is 6.99%, while Sunoco LP (SUN) has a volatility of 8.22%. This indicates that PG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SUN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PGSUNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.99%

8.22%

-1.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.01%

16.97%

-1.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.78%

23.06%

-4.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.82%

23.67%

-5.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.05%

31.76%

-12.71%

Dividends

PG vs. SUN - Dividend Comparison

PG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.85%, less than SUN's 5.74% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PG
The Procter & Gamble Company
2.85%2.91%2.36%2.55%2.38%2.08%2.24%2.37%3.09%2.98%3.18%3.31%
SUN
Sunoco LP
5.74%6.89%6.74%5.59%7.66%8.09%11.47%10.79%12.14%11.63%12.16%6.78%

Financials

PG vs. SUN - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Procter & Gamble Company and Sunoco LP. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B20222023202420252026
21.24B
0
(PG) Total Revenue
(SUN) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


PG and SUN have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SUN has higher volatility (8.22%) compared to PG (6.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PG dropped -54.25% vs SUN's -65.47%.

SUN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.27 vs -0.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PG and SUN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer