PG vs. PH
PG (The Procter & Gamble Company) and PH (Parker-Hannifin Corporation) are both stocks. PG operates in Household & Personal Products (Consumer Defensive), while PH operates in Specialty Industrial Machinery (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, PG returned 8.14%/yr vs 25.97%/yr for PH. Their 0.27 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
PG vs. PH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PG achieves a 3.07% return, which is significantly lower than PH's 11.56% return. Over the past 10 years, PG has underperformed PH with an annualized return of 8.14%, while PH has yielded a comparatively higher 25.97% annualized return.
PG
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- -1.26%
- 6M
- -3.36%
- YTD
- 3.07%
- 1Y
- -1.15%
- 3Y*
- 0.02%
- 5Y*
- 2.93%
- 10Y*
- 8.14%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.08%
PH
- 1D
- 1.43%
- 1M
- 1.32%
- 6M
- 4.78%
- YTD
- 11.56%
- 1Y
- 34.58%
- 3Y*
- 34.53%
- 5Y*
- 27.26%
- 10Y*
- 25.97%
- ALL TIME*
- 14.99%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.25B | $1.28B | $1.30B | |
| $537.51M | $523.59M | $635.17M |
PG vs. PH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PG The Procter & Gamble Company | 3.07% | -12.26% | 17.25% | -0.86% | -5.05% | 20.52% | 14.15% | 39.70% | 3.57% | 12.69% |
PH Parker-Hannifin Corporation | 11.56% | 39.54% | 39.58% | 60.81% | -6.91% | 18.30% | 34.78% | 40.75% | -24.00% | 44.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between PG and PH is 0.09, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.08 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.18 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 1985 | 0.27 |
The correlation between PG and PH shifts across timeframes, from 0.08 (3 years) to 0.27 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
PG:
$336.46B
PH:
$123.13B
PG:
$6.62
PH:
$27.15
PG:
21.84
PH:
35.96
PG:
7.21
PH:
1.52
PG:
4.03
PH:
5.96
PG:
6.44
PH:
8.03
PG:
$87.03B
PH:
$20.99B
PG:
$43.67B
PH:
$7.81B
PG:
$21.25B
PH:
$5.31B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PG vs. PH — Risk / Return Rank
PG
PH
PG vs. PH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) and Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PG | PH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.94 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.24 | -0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.07 | 1.80 | -1.87 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.13 | 5.07 | -5.20 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PG vs. PH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PG drawdown since its inception was -54.25%, smaller than the maximum PH drawdown of -66.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PG and PH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PG | PH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.25% | -66.92% | +12.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.52% | -19.34% | +3.82% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.15% | -26.79% | +5.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.77% | -28.64% | +4.87% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -23.77% | -54.68% | +30.91% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.63% | -4.33% | -11.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.17% | -15.30% | +3.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.06% | 6.85% | +2.21% |
Volatility
PG vs. PH - Volatility Comparison
The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) has a higher volatility of 6.95% compared to Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH) at 6.43%. This indicates that PG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PG | PH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.95% | 6.43% | +0.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.72% | 19.46% | -3.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.64% | 25.70% | -6.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.08% | 28.66% | -10.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.18% | 31.62% | -12.44% |
Dividends
PG vs. PH - Dividend Comparison
PG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.97%, more than PH's 0.76% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PG The Procter & Gamble Company | 2.97% | 2.91% | 2.36% | 2.55% | 2.38% | 2.08% | 2.24% | 2.37% | 3.09% | 2.98% | 3.18% | 3.31% |
PH Parker-Hannifin Corporation | 0.76% | 0.80% | 1.00% | 1.25% | 1.73% | 1.25% | 1.29% | 1.65% | 1.97% | 1.32% | 1.80% | 2.60% |
Financials
PG vs. PH - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Procter & Gamble Company and Parker-Hannifin Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
PG vs. PH - Profitability Comparison
PG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, The Procter & Gamble Company reported a gross profit of 10.28B and revenue of 21.20B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 48.5%.
PH - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Parker-Hannifin Corporation reported a gross profit of 2.02B and revenue of 5.49B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.8%.
PG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, The Procter & Gamble Company reported an operating income of 3.95B and revenue of 21.20B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.6%.
PH - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Parker-Hannifin Corporation reported an operating income of 1.13B and revenue of 5.49B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.7%.
PG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, The Procter & Gamble Company reported a net income of 3.00B and revenue of 21.20B, resulting in a net margin of 14.1%.
PH - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Parker-Hannifin Corporation reported a net income of 904.00M and revenue of 5.49B, resulting in a net margin of 16.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
PG and PH have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PG has higher volatility (6.95%) compared to PH (6.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PG dropped -54.25% vs PH's -66.92%.
PH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.35 vs -0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PG and PH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer