PG vs. PH
PG (The Procter & Gamble Company) and PH (Parker-Hannifin Corporation) are both stocks. PG operates in Household & Personal Products (Consumer Defensive), while PH operates in Specialty Industrial Machinery (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, PG returned 8.64%/yr vs 24.75%/yr for PH. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PG vs. PH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PG achieves a 2.74% return, which is significantly higher than PH's 0.89% return. Over the past 10 years, PG has underperformed PH with an annualized return of 8.64%, while PH has yielded a comparatively higher 24.75% annualized return.
PG
- 1D
- -0.98%
- 1M
- -0.90%
- YTD
- 2.74%
- 6M
- 6.43%
- 1Y
- -8.99%
- 3Y*
- 2.29%
- 5Y*
- 4.10%
- 10Y*
- 8.64%
PH
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 0.49%
- YTD
- 0.89%
- 6M
- 0.81%
- 1Y
- 32.71%
- 3Y*
- 36.81%
- 5Y*
- 25.26%
- 10Y*
- 24.75%
PG vs. PH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PG The Procter & Gamble Company | 2.74% | -12.26% | 17.25% | -0.86% | -5.05% | 20.52% | 14.15% | 39.70% | 3.57% | 12.69% |
PH Parker-Hannifin Corporation | 0.89% | 39.54% | 39.58% | 60.81% | -6.91% | 18.30% | 34.78% | 40.75% | -24.00% | 44.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between PG and PH is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 1985 | 0.27 |
The correlation between PG and PH shifts across timeframes, from 0.08 (3 years) to 0.27 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
PG:
$350.63B
PH:
$113.04B
PG:
$5.23
PH:
$27.11
PG:
27.76
PH:
32.58
PG:
6.79
PH:
1.37
PG:
4.07
PH:
5.40
PG:
6.50
PH:
7.26
PG:
$86.72B
PH:
$20.99B
PG:
$43.64B
PH:
$7.81B
PG:
$22.63B
PH:
$5.31B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PG vs. PH — Risk / Return Rank
PG
PH
PG vs. PH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) and Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PG | PH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.82 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.24 | -0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.58 | 1.70 | -2.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.04 | 5.17 | -6.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PG | PH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.48 | 1.34 | -1.82 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 | 0.89 | -0.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 | 0.78 | -0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.44 | +0.02 |
Drawdowns
PG vs. PH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PG drawdown since its inception was -54.25%, smaller than the maximum PH drawdown of -66.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PG and PH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PG | PH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.25% | -66.92% | +12.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.52% | -19.34% | +3.82% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.15% | -26.79% | +5.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.77% | -28.64% | +4.87% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -23.77% | -54.68% | +30.91% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.91% | -13.48% | -2.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.16% | -15.33% | +3.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.93% | 6.34% | +2.59% |
Volatility
PG vs. PH - Volatility Comparison
The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) has a higher volatility of 7.01% compared to Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH) at 5.59%. This indicates that PG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PG | PH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.01% | 5.59% | +1.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.32% | 18.60% | -3.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.65% | 24.62% | -5.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.79% | 28.61% | -10.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.05% | 31.69% | -12.64% |
Dividends
PG vs. PH - Dividend Comparison
PG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.94%, more than PH's 0.84% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PG The Procter & Gamble Company | 2.94% | 2.91% | 2.36% | 2.55% | 2.38% | 2.08% | 2.24% | 2.37% | 3.09% | 2.98% | 3.18% | 3.31% |
PH Parker-Hannifin Corporation | 0.84% | 0.80% | 1.00% | 1.25% | 1.73% | 1.25% | 1.29% | 1.65% | 1.97% | 1.32% | 1.80% | 2.60% |
Financials
PG vs. PH - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Procter & Gamble Company and Parker-Hannifin Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
PG vs. PH - Profitability Comparison
PG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Procter & Gamble Company reported a gross profit of 10.51B and revenue of 21.24B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.5%.
PH - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Parker-Hannifin Corporation reported a gross profit of 2.02B and revenue of 5.49B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.8%.
PG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Procter & Gamble Company reported an operating income of 4.58B and revenue of 21.24B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.6%.
PH - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Parker-Hannifin Corporation reported an operating income of 1.13B and revenue of 5.49B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.7%.
PG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Procter & Gamble Company reported a net income of 18.50M and revenue of 21.24B, resulting in a net margin of 0.1%.
PH - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Parker-Hannifin Corporation reported a net income of 904.00M and revenue of 5.49B, resulting in a net margin of 16.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
PG and PH have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PG has higher volatility (7.01%) compared to PH (5.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PG dropped -54.25% vs PH's -66.92%.
PH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.34 vs -0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PG and PH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer