PG vs. GRC
PG (The Procter & Gamble Company) and GRC (The Gorman-Rupp Company) are both stocks. PG operates in Household & Personal Products (Consumer Defensive), while GRC operates in Specialty Industrial Machinery (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, PG returned 8.14%/yr vs 14.38%/yr for GRC. Their 0.21 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
PG vs. GRC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PG achieves a 3.07% return, which is significantly lower than GRC's 70.94% return. Over the past 10 years, PG has underperformed GRC with an annualized return of 8.14%, while GRC has yielded a comparatively higher 14.38% annualized return.
PG
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- -1.26%
- 6M
- -3.36%
- YTD
- 3.07%
- 1Y
- -1.15%
- 3Y*
- 0.02%
- 5Y*
- 2.93%
- 10Y*
- 8.14%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.08%
GRC
- 1D
- 0.62%
- 1M
- -8.49%
- 6M
- 49.80%
- YTD
- 70.94%
- 1Y
- 100.02%
- 3Y*
- 38.18%
- 5Y*
- 20.22%
- 10Y*
- 14.38%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.19%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $19.01M | $17.85M | $14.41M | |
| $1.25B | $1.28B | $1.30B |
PG vs. GRC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PG The Procter & Gamble Company | 3.07% | -12.26% | 17.25% | -0.86% | -5.05% | 20.52% | 14.15% | 39.70% | 3.57% | 12.69% |
GRC The Gorman-Rupp Company | 70.94% | 28.24% | 8.87% | 42.15% | -41.17% | 39.71% | -11.90% | 17.64% | 11.75% | 2.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between PG and GRC is 0.10, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.10 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.09 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.18 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 17, 1992 | 0.21 |
The correlation between PG and GRC shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (3 years) to 0.21 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
PG:
$336.46B
GRC:
$2.14B
PG:
$6.62
GRC:
$2.37
PG:
21.84
GRC:
34.27
PG:
7.21
GRC:
0.70
PG:
4.03
GRC:
3.04
PG:
6.44
GRC:
4.85
PG:
$87.03B
GRC:
$702.05M
PG:
$43.67B
GRC:
$214.56M
PG:
$21.25B
GRC:
$129.99M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PG vs. GRC — Risk / Return Rank
PG
GRC
PG vs. GRC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) and The Gorman-Rupp Company (GRC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PG | GRC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.87 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.44 | -0.44 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.07 | 6.75 | -6.82 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.13 | 17.21 | -17.34 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PG vs. GRC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PG drawdown since its inception was -54.25%, smaller than the maximum GRC drawdown of -67.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PG and GRC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PG | GRC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.25% | -67.23% | +12.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.52% | -14.90% | -0.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.15% | -26.87% | +5.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.77% | -49.26% | +25.49% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -23.77% | -49.26% | +25.49% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.63% | -11.50% | -4.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.17% | -17.59% | +5.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.06% | 5.83% | +3.23% |
Volatility
PG vs. GRC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) is 6.95%, while The Gorman-Rupp Company (GRC) has a volatility of 12.13%. This indicates that PG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GRC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PG | GRC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.95% | 12.13% | -5.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.72% | 30.07% | -14.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.64% | 35.80% | -16.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.08% | 31.19% | -13.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.18% | 34.00% | -14.82% |
Dividends
PG vs. GRC - Dividend Comparison
PG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.97%, more than GRC's 0.93% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GRC The Gorman-Rupp Company | 0.93% | 1.56% | 1.91% | 1.98% | 2.67% | 1.43% | 1.82% | 1.47% | 7.74% | 1.51% | 1.39% | 1.52% |
PG The Procter & Gamble Company | 2.97% | 2.91% | 2.36% | 2.55% | 2.38% | 2.08% | 2.24% | 2.37% | 3.09% | 2.98% | 3.18% | 3.31% |
Financials
PG vs. GRC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Procter & Gamble Company and The Gorman-Rupp Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
PG vs. GRC - Profitability Comparison
PG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, The Procter & Gamble Company reported a gross profit of 10.28B and revenue of 21.20B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 48.5%.
GRC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, The Gorman-Rupp Company reported a gross profit of 63.69M and revenue of 186.07M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 34.2%.
PG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, The Procter & Gamble Company reported an operating income of 3.95B and revenue of 21.20B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.6%.
GRC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, The Gorman-Rupp Company reported an operating income of 30.41M and revenue of 186.07M, resulting in an operating margin of 16.3%.
PG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, The Procter & Gamble Company reported a net income of 3.00B and revenue of 21.20B, resulting in a net margin of 14.1%.
GRC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, The Gorman-Rupp Company reported a net income of 19.43M and revenue of 186.07M, resulting in a net margin of 10.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
PG and GRC have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GRC has higher volatility (12.13%) compared to PG (6.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PG dropped -54.25% vs GRC's -67.23%.
GRC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.81 vs -0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PG and GRC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer