PFXF vs. PFLD
PFXF (VanEck Vectors Preferred Securities ex Financials ETF) and PFLD (AAM Low Duration Preferred and Income Securities ETF 144A) are both Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds funds - PFXF tracks the Wells Fargo Hybrid and Preferred Securities ex Financials Index while PFLD tracks the ICE 0-5 Year Duration Exchange-Listed Preferred & Hybrid Securities Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PFXF returned 4.48%/yr vs 1.04%/yr for PFLD. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PFXF charges 0.41%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for PFLD.
Performance
PFXF vs. PFLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PFXF achieves a 8.54% return, which is significantly higher than PFLD's 2.69% return.
PFXF
- 1D
- -0.95%
- 1M
- 2.21%
- YTD
- 8.54%
- 6M
- 9.54%
- 1Y
- 18.28%
- 3Y*
- 10.30%
- 5Y*
- 4.48%
- 10Y*
- 5.44%
PFLD
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 0.74%
- YTD
- 2.69%
- 6M
- 2.90%
- 1Y
- 6.25%
- 3Y*
- 4.93%
- 5Y*
- 1.04%
- 10Y*
- —
PFXF vs. PFLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PFXF VanEck Vectors Preferred Securities ex Financials ETF | 8.54% | 9.64% | 8.42% | 11.20% | -18.83% | 11.61% | 7.61% | 2.01% |
PFLD AAM Low Duration Preferred and Income Securities ETF 144A | 2.69% | 1.44% | 5.48% | 8.16% | -12.73% | 4.49% | 5.34% | 1.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between PFXF and PFLD is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2019 | 0.65 |
Over the past year, the correlation between PFXF and PFLD has dropped to 0.32 - well below their long-term average of 0.65, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
PFXF vs. PFLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PFXF
PFLD
Real Estate
-
Utilities
Technology
-
Communication Services
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Industrials
-
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Real Estate
PFXF
PFLD
-
Utilities
PFXF
PFLD
Technology
PFXF
PFLD
-
Communication Services
PFXF
PFLD
-
Financial Services
PFXF
PFLD
-
Healthcare
PFXF
PFLD
-
Consumer Defensive
PFXF
PFLD
-
Consumer Cyclical
PFXF
PFLD
-
Industrials
PFXF
PFLD
-
Energy
PFXF
PFLD
-
Basic Materials
PFXF
-
PFLD
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PFXF vs. PFLD — Risk / Return Rank
PFXF
PFLD
PFXF vs. PFLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Preferred Securities ex Financials ETF (PFXF) and AAM Low Duration Preferred and Income Securities ETF 144A (PFLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PFXF | PFLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.35 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.15 | 2.81 | +0.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.08 | 12.46 | -1.38 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PFXF | PFLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.06 | 1.85 | +0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 | 0.14 | +0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.41 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 0.17 | +0.32 |
Drawdowns
PFXF vs. PFLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PFXF drawdown since its inception was -35.49%, which is greater than PFLD's maximum drawdown of -33.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFXF and PFLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PFXF | PFLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.49% | -33.20% | -2.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.83% | -2.23% | -3.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.90% | -6.41% | -5.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.80% | -15.51% | -6.29% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.49% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.95% | 0.00% | -0.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.91% | -4.17% | +0.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.65% | 0.50% | +1.15% |
Volatility
PFXF vs. PFLD - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Vectors Preferred Securities ex Financials ETF (PFXF) has a higher volatility of 3.14% compared to AAM Low Duration Preferred and Income Securities ETF 144A (PFLD) at 0.84%. This indicates that PFXF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PFLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PFXF | PFLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.14% | 0.84% | +2.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.89% | 2.26% | +4.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.94% | 3.39% | +5.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.91% | 7.50% | +3.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.21% | 13.38% | -0.17% |
PFXF vs. PFLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
PFXF has a 0.41% expense ratio, which is lower than PFLD's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
PFXF vs. PFLD - Dividend Comparison
PFXF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.08%, more than PFLD's 5.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PFLD AAM Low Duration Preferred and Income Securities ETF 144A | 5.60% | 6.52% | 7.09% | 7.09% | 5.76% | 4.52% | 4.79% | 0.82% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PFXF VanEck Vectors Preferred Securities ex Financials ETF | 6.08% | 6.72% | 7.82% | 7.88% | 6.74% | 4.66% | 5.19% | 5.35% | 6.56% | 5.93% | 5.81% | 5.99% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PFXF and PFLD have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PFXF has higher volatility (3.14%) compared to PFLD (0.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PFXF dropped -35.49% vs PFLD's -33.20%.
On 5-year performance, PFXF leads with 4.48% vs 1.04% for PFLD. On fees, PFXF is cheaper at 0.41% per year. On volatility, PFLD has been the lower-risk option at 0.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, PFXF has performed better with a 4.48% return vs 1.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PFXF is cheaper with a 0.41% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for PFLD.
PFXF has the higher dividend yield at 6.08%, compared with 5.60% for PFLD.
PFXF tracks Wells Fargo Hybrid and Preferred Securities ex Financials Index, while PFLD tracks ICE 0-5 Year Duration Exchange-Listed Preferred & Hybrid Securities Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Advisors Asset Management. Their fees differ too: 0.41% for PFXF and 0.45% for PFLD.
PFXF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PFXF and PFLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer