PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PFXF vs. PFFD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PFXF vs. PFFD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Preferred Securities ex Financials ETF (PFXF) and Global X U.S. Preferred ETF (PFFD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PFXF achieves a 4.43% return, which is significantly higher than PFFD's 2.14% return.


PFXF

1D
2.10%
1M
1.13%
6M
1.23%
YTD
4.43%
1Y
9.79%
3Y*
8.72%
5Y*
3.13%
10Y*
4.73%
ALL TIME*
5.36%

PFFD

1D
1.03%
1M
0.71%
6M
-0.39%
YTD
2.14%
1Y
4.18%
3Y*
5.40%
5Y*
-0.58%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
2.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$14.67M$14.04M$12.09M
$14.01M$13.64M$16.82M

PFXF vs. PFFD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PFXF
VanEck Preferred Securities ex Financials ETF
4.43%9.64%8.42%11.20%-18.83%11.61%7.61%20.52%-4.17%-0.34%
PFFD
Global X U.S. Preferred ETF
2.14%3.22%7.07%6.85%-20.20%5.07%8.90%17.43%-3.94%0.69%

Correlation

The correlation between PFXF and PFFD is 0.84, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2017

0.80

The correlation between PFXF and PFFD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PFXF vs. PFFD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PFXF
PFXF Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
PFXF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFXF Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFXF Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
PFXF Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFXF Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

PFFD
PFFD Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
PFFD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFFD Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFFD Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
PFFD Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFFD Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PFXF vs. PFFD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Preferred Securities ex Financials ETF (PFXF) and Global X U.S. Preferred ETF (PFFD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PFXFPFFDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.10

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.22

0.70

+0.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.58

1.93

+1.65

PFXF vs. PFFD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PFXF Sharpe Ratio is 0.97, which is higher than the PFFD Sharpe Ratio of 0.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PFXF and PFFD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PFXF vs. PFFD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PFXF drawdown since its inception was -35.49%, which is greater than PFFD's maximum drawdown of -30.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFXF and PFFD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PFXFPFFDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.49%

-30.93%

-4.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.04%

-5.97%

-2.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.90%

-10.84%

-1.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.80%

-24.45%

+2.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.70%

-3.83%

-0.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.92%

-6.54%

+2.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.74%

2.17%

+0.57%

Volatility

PFXF vs. PFFD - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Preferred Securities ex Financials ETF (PFXF) has a higher volatility of 4.27% compared to Global X U.S. Preferred ETF (PFFD) at 2.74%. This indicates that PFXF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PFFD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PFXFPFFDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.27%

2.74%

+1.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.25%

5.78%

+2.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.15%

7.50%

+2.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.15%

11.06%

+0.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.31%

12.68%

+0.63%

PFXF vs. PFFD - Expense Ratio Comparison

PFXF has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than PFFD's 0.23% expense ratio.


Dividends

PFXF vs. PFFD - Dividend Comparison

PFXF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.56%, more than PFFD's 6.45% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PFFD
Global X U.S. Preferred ETF
6.45%6.37%6.42%6.49%6.63%5.09%5.17%5.48%6.21%1.94%0.00%0.00%
PFXF
VanEck Preferred Securities ex Financials ETF
6.56%6.72%7.82%7.88%6.74%4.66%5.19%5.35%6.56%5.93%5.81%5.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


PFXF and PFFD have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PFXF has higher volatility (4.27%) compared to PFFD (2.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PFXF dropped -35.49% vs PFFD's -30.93%.

On 5-year performance, PFXF leads with 3.13% vs -0.58% for PFFD. On fees, PFFD is cheaper at 0.23% per year. On volatility, PFFD has been the lower-risk option at 2.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, PFXF has performed better with a 3.13% return vs -0.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PFFD is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for PFXF.

PFXF has the higher dividend yield at 6.56%, compared with 6.45% for PFFD.

PFXF tracks ICE Exchange-Listed Fixed & Adjustable Rate Non-Financial Preferred Securities Index, while PFFD tracks ICE BofA Diversified Core U.S. Preferred Securities Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for PFXF and 0.23% for PFFD.

PFXF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.97 vs 0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PFXF and PFFD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer