PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PFXF vs. PFFD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PFXF vs. PFFD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Vectors Preferred Securities ex Financials ETF (PFXF) and Global X U.S. Preferred ETF (PFFD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PFXF achieves a 8.54% return, which is significantly higher than PFFD's 2.29% return.


PFXF

1D
-0.95%
1M
2.21%
YTD
8.54%
6M
9.54%
1Y
18.28%
3Y*
10.30%
5Y*
4.48%
10Y*
5.44%

PFFD

1D
-0.58%
1M
0.16%
YTD
2.29%
6M
2.67%
1Y
7.65%
3Y*
5.10%
5Y*
-0.16%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PFXF vs. PFFD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PFXF
VanEck Vectors Preferred Securities ex Financials ETF
8.54%9.64%8.42%11.20%-18.83%11.61%7.61%20.52%-4.17%-0.04%
PFFD
Global X U.S. Preferred ETF
2.29%3.22%7.07%6.85%-20.20%5.07%8.90%17.43%-3.94%0.85%

Correlation

The correlation between PFXF and PFFD is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 14, 2017

0.80

The correlation between PFXF and PFFD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

PFXF vs. PFFD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PFXF
PFFD

Real Estate

14.0%
4.0%

Utilities

12.4%
15.3%

Technology

9.7%
6.3%

Communication Services

6.7%
4.4%

Financial Services

6.2%
59.1%

Healthcare

3.0%
0.8%

Consumer Defensive

2.9%

-

Consumer Cyclical

2.2%
1.6%

Industrials

1.0%
5.4%

Energy

0.4%

-

Basic Materials

-

3.0%

Real Estate

PFXF
14.0%
PFFD
4.0%

Utilities

PFXF
12.4%
PFFD
15.3%

Technology

PFXF
9.7%
PFFD
6.3%

Communication Services

PFXF
6.7%
PFFD
4.4%

Financial Services

PFXF
6.2%
PFFD
59.1%

Healthcare

PFXF
3.0%
PFFD
0.8%

Consumer Defensive

PFXF
2.9%
PFFD

-

Consumer Cyclical

PFXF
2.2%
PFFD
1.6%

Industrials

PFXF
1.0%
PFFD
5.4%

Energy

PFXF
0.4%
PFFD

-

Basic Materials

PFXF

-

PFFD
3.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PFXF vs. PFFD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PFXF
PFXF Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
PFXF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFXF Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFXF Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
PFXF Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFXF Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

PFFD
PFFD Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
PFFD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFFD Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFFD Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
PFFD Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFFD Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PFXF vs. PFFD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Preferred Securities ex Financials ETF (PFXF) and Global X U.S. Preferred ETF (PFFD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PFXFPFFDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.99

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.19

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.15

1.29

+1.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.08

3.81

+7.27

PFXF vs. PFFD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PFXF Sharpe Ratio is 2.06, which is higher than the PFFD Sharpe Ratio of 1.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PFXF and PFFD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PFXFPFFDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.06

1.07

+0.99

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

-0.01

+0.43

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.21

+0.28

Drawdowns

PFXF vs. PFFD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PFXF drawdown since its inception was -35.49%, which is greater than PFFD's maximum drawdown of -30.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFXF and PFFD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PFXFPFFDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.49%

-30.93%

-4.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.83%

-5.97%

+0.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.90%

-10.84%

-1.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.80%

-24.45%

+2.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.95%

-3.68%

+2.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.91%

-6.59%

+2.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.65%

2.01%

-0.36%

Volatility

PFXF vs. PFFD - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Vectors Preferred Securities ex Financials ETF (PFXF) has a higher volatility of 3.14% compared to Global X U.S. Preferred ETF (PFFD) at 2.09%. This indicates that PFXF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PFFD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PFXFPFFDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.14%

2.09%

+1.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.89%

5.32%

+1.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.94%

7.19%

+1.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.91%

10.98%

-0.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.21%

12.76%

+0.45%

PFXF vs. PFFD - Expense Ratio Comparison

PFXF has a 0.41% expense ratio, which is higher than PFFD's 0.23% expense ratio.


Dividends

PFXF vs. PFFD - Dividend Comparison

PFXF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.08%, less than PFFD's 6.37% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PFFD
Global X U.S. Preferred ETF
6.37%6.37%6.42%6.49%6.63%5.09%5.17%5.48%6.21%1.94%0.00%0.00%
PFXF
VanEck Vectors Preferred Securities ex Financials ETF
6.08%6.72%7.82%7.88%6.74%4.66%5.19%5.35%6.56%5.93%5.81%5.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


PFXF and PFFD have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PFXF has higher volatility (3.14%) compared to PFFD (2.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PFXF dropped -35.49% vs PFFD's -30.93%.

On 5-year performance, PFXF leads with 4.48% vs -0.16% for PFFD. On fees, PFFD is cheaper at 0.23% per year. On volatility, PFFD has been the lower-risk option at 2.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, PFXF has performed better with a 4.48% return vs -0.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PFFD is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.41% for PFXF.

PFFD has the higher dividend yield at 6.37%, compared with 6.08% for PFXF.

PFXF tracks Wells Fargo Hybrid and Preferred Securities ex Financials Index, while PFFD tracks ICE BofAML Diversified Core U.S. Preferred Securities Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.41% for PFXF and 0.23% for PFFD.

PFXF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PFXF and PFFD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer