PFXF vs. GDX
PFXF (VanEck Vectors Preferred Securities ex Financials ETF) and GDX (VanEck Gold Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PFXF is a Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds fund tracking the Wells Fargo Hybrid and Preferred Securities ex Financials Index, while GDX is a Gold fund tracking the NYSE MarketVector Global Gold Miners Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PFXF returned 5.44%/yr vs 13.98%/yr for GDX. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PFXF charges 0.41%/yr vs 0.51%/yr for GDX.
Performance
PFXF vs. GDX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PFXF achieves a 8.54% return, which is significantly higher than GDX's -0.90% return. Over the past 10 years, PFXF has underperformed GDX with an annualized return of 5.44%, while GDX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.98% annualized return.
PFXF
- 1D
- -0.95%
- 1M
- 2.21%
- YTD
- 8.54%
- 6M
- 9.54%
- 1Y
- 18.28%
- 3Y*
- 10.30%
- 5Y*
- 4.48%
- 10Y*
- 5.44%
GDX
- 1D
- -3.46%
- 1M
- -0.76%
- YTD
- -0.90%
- 6M
- 5.62%
- 1Y
- 61.27%
- 3Y*
- 41.00%
- 5Y*
- 18.69%
- 10Y*
- 13.98%
PFXF vs. GDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PFXF VanEck Vectors Preferred Securities ex Financials ETF | 8.54% | 9.64% | 8.42% | 11.20% | -18.83% | 11.61% | 7.61% | 20.52% | -4.17% | 7.93% |
GDX VanEck Gold Miners ETF | -0.90% | 154.77% | 10.63% | 9.98% | -9.01% | -9.52% | 23.66% | 39.84% | -8.77% | 11.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between PFXF and GDX is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 20, 2012 | 0.24 |
PFXF vs. GDX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PFXF
GDX
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
-
Communication Services
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Industrials
-
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
Real Estate
PFXF
GDX
-
Utilities
PFXF
GDX
-
Technology
PFXF
GDX
-
Communication Services
PFXF
GDX
-
Financial Services
PFXF
GDX
-
Healthcare
PFXF
GDX
-
Consumer Defensive
PFXF
GDX
-
Consumer Cyclical
PFXF
GDX
-
Industrials
PFXF
GDX
-
Energy
PFXF
GDX
-
Basic Materials
PFXF
-
GDX
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PFXF vs. GDX — Risk / Return Rank
PFXF
GDX
PFXF vs. GDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Preferred Securities ex Financials ETF (PFXF) and VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PFXF | GDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.70 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.25 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.15 | 2.00 | +1.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.08 | 5.13 | +5.96 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PFXF | GDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.06 | 1.35 | +0.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 | 0.52 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.41 | 0.38 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 0.13 | +0.36 |
Drawdowns
PFXF vs. GDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PFXF drawdown since its inception was -35.49%, smaller than the maximum GDX drawdown of -80.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFXF and GDX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PFXF | GDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.49% | -80.34% | +44.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.83% | -30.84% | +25.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.90% | -30.84% | +18.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.80% | -46.51% | +24.71% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.49% | -49.79% | +14.30% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.95% | -26.62% | +25.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.91% | -40.43% | +36.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.65% | 11.99% | -10.34% |
Volatility
PFXF vs. GDX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Vectors Preferred Securities ex Financials ETF (PFXF) is 3.14%, while VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) has a volatility of 15.40%. This indicates that PFXF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PFXF | GDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.14% | 15.40% | -12.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.89% | 37.50% | -30.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.94% | 45.49% | -36.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.91% | 36.39% | -25.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.21% | 37.18% | -23.97% |
PFXF vs. GDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PFXF has a 0.41% expense ratio, which is lower than GDX's 0.51% expense ratio.
Dividends
PFXF vs. GDX - Dividend Comparison
PFXF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.08%, more than GDX's 0.74% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GDX VanEck Gold Miners ETF | 0.74% | 0.74% | 1.19% | 1.61% | 1.66% | 1.67% | 0.53% | 0.67% | 0.50% | 0.76% | 0.26% | 0.85% |
PFXF VanEck Vectors Preferred Securities ex Financials ETF | 6.08% | 6.72% | 7.82% | 7.88% | 6.74% | 4.66% | 5.19% | 5.35% | 6.56% | 5.93% | 5.81% | 5.99% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PFXF and GDX have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GDX has higher volatility (15.40%) compared to PFXF (3.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PFXF dropped -35.49% vs GDX's -80.34%.
On 10-year performance, GDX leads with 13.98% vs 5.44% for PFXF. On fees, PFXF is cheaper at 0.41% per year. On volatility, PFXF has been the lower-risk option at 3.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, GDX has performed better with a 13.98% return vs 5.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PFXF is cheaper with a 0.41% expense ratio, compared with 0.51% for GDX.
PFXF has the higher dividend yield at 6.08%, compared with 0.74% for GDX.
PFXF is categorized as Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds, while GDX is Gold. PFXF tracks Wells Fargo Hybrid and Preferred Securities ex Financials Index, while GDX tracks NYSE MarketVector Global Gold Miners Index. Their fees differ too: 0.41% for PFXF and 0.51% for GDX.
PFXF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PFXF and GDX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer