PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PFXF vs. GDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PFXF vs. GDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Vectors Preferred Securities ex Financials ETF (PFXF) and VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PFXF achieves a 8.54% return, which is significantly higher than GDX's -0.90% return. Over the past 10 years, PFXF has underperformed GDX with an annualized return of 5.44%, while GDX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.98% annualized return.


PFXF

1D
-0.95%
1M
2.21%
YTD
8.54%
6M
9.54%
1Y
18.28%
3Y*
10.30%
5Y*
4.48%
10Y*
5.44%

GDX

1D
-3.46%
1M
-0.76%
YTD
-0.90%
6M
5.62%
1Y
61.27%
3Y*
41.00%
5Y*
18.69%
10Y*
13.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PFXF vs. GDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PFXF
VanEck Vectors Preferred Securities ex Financials ETF
8.54%9.64%8.42%11.20%-18.83%11.61%7.61%20.52%-4.17%7.93%
GDX
VanEck Gold Miners ETF
-0.90%154.77%10.63%9.98%-9.01%-9.52%23.66%39.84%-8.77%11.99%

Correlation

The correlation between PFXF and GDX is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.31

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 20, 2012

0.24

PFXF vs. GDX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PFXF
GDX

Real Estate

14.0%

-

Utilities

12.4%

-

Technology

9.7%

-

Communication Services

6.7%

-

Financial Services

6.2%

-

Healthcare

3.0%

-

Consumer Defensive

2.9%

-

Consumer Cyclical

2.2%

-

Industrials

1.0%

-

Energy

0.4%

-

Basic Materials

-

100.0%

Real Estate

PFXF
14.0%
GDX

-

Utilities

PFXF
12.4%
GDX

-

Technology

PFXF
9.7%
GDX

-

Communication Services

PFXF
6.7%
GDX

-

Financial Services

PFXF
6.2%
GDX

-

Healthcare

PFXF
3.0%
GDX

-

Consumer Defensive

PFXF
2.9%
GDX

-

Consumer Cyclical

PFXF
2.2%
GDX

-

Industrials

PFXF
1.0%
GDX

-

Energy

PFXF
0.4%
GDX

-

Basic Materials

PFXF

-

GDX
100.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PFXF vs. GDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PFXF
PFXF Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
PFXF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFXF Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFXF Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
PFXF Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFXF Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

GDX
GDX Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
GDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
GDX Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
GDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
GDX Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PFXF vs. GDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Preferred Securities ex Financials ETF (PFXF) and VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PFXFGDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.25

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.15

2.00

+1.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.08

5.13

+5.96

PFXF vs. GDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PFXF Sharpe Ratio is 2.06, which is higher than the GDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PFXF and GDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PFXFGDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.06

1.35

+0.70

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

0.52

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

0.38

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.13

+0.36

Drawdowns

PFXF vs. GDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PFXF drawdown since its inception was -35.49%, smaller than the maximum GDX drawdown of -80.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFXF and GDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PFXFGDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.49%

-80.34%

+44.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.83%

-30.84%

+25.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.90%

-30.84%

+18.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.80%

-46.51%

+24.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.49%

-49.79%

+14.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.95%

-26.62%

+25.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.91%

-40.43%

+36.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.65%

11.99%

-10.34%

Volatility

PFXF vs. GDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Vectors Preferred Securities ex Financials ETF (PFXF) is 3.14%, while VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) has a volatility of 15.40%. This indicates that PFXF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PFXFGDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.14%

15.40%

-12.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.89%

37.50%

-30.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.94%

45.49%

-36.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.91%

36.39%

-25.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.21%

37.18%

-23.97%

PFXF vs. GDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PFXF has a 0.41% expense ratio, which is lower than GDX's 0.51% expense ratio.


Dividends

PFXF vs. GDX - Dividend Comparison

PFXF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.08%, more than GDX's 0.74% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GDX
VanEck Gold Miners ETF
0.74%0.74%1.19%1.61%1.66%1.67%0.53%0.67%0.50%0.76%0.26%0.85%
PFXF
VanEck Vectors Preferred Securities ex Financials ETF
6.08%6.72%7.82%7.88%6.74%4.66%5.19%5.35%6.56%5.93%5.81%5.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


PFXF and GDX have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GDX has higher volatility (15.40%) compared to PFXF (3.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PFXF dropped -35.49% vs GDX's -80.34%.

On 10-year performance, GDX leads with 13.98% vs 5.44% for PFXF. On fees, PFXF is cheaper at 0.41% per year. On volatility, PFXF has been the lower-risk option at 3.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, GDX has performed better with a 13.98% return vs 5.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PFXF is cheaper with a 0.41% expense ratio, compared with 0.51% for GDX.

PFXF has the higher dividend yield at 6.08%, compared with 0.74% for GDX.

PFXF is categorized as Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds, while GDX is Gold. PFXF tracks Wells Fargo Hybrid and Preferred Securities ex Financials Index, while GDX tracks NYSE MarketVector Global Gold Miners Index. Their fees differ too: 0.41% for PFXF and 0.51% for GDX.

PFXF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PFXF and GDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer