PFUMX vs. AMAPX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

PFUMX (Principal Finisterre Emerging Markets Total Return Bond Fund) and AMAPX (Amana Participation Fund) are both Emerging Markets Bonds funds. Over the past 5 years, PFUMX returned 4.41%/yr vs 1.30%/yr for AMAPX. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PFUMX charges 0.84%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for AMAPX.

Performance

PFUMX vs. AMAPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal Finisterre Emerging Markets Total Return Bond Fund (PFUMX) and Amana Participation Fund (AMAPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PFUMX achieves a 2.32% return, which is significantly higher than AMAPX's 0.16% return.

PFUMX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.61%
• YTD: 2.32%
• 6M: 3.06%
• 1Y: 12.60%
• 3Y*: 10.75%
• 5Y*: 4.41%
• 10Y*: —

AMAPX

• 1D: -0.10%
• 1M: 0.12%
• YTD: 0.16%
• 6M: 0.50%
• 1Y: 3.92%
• 3Y*: 3.72%
• 5Y*: 1.30%
• 10Y*: 2.21%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PFUMX vs. AMAPX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PFUMX Principal Finisterre Emerging Markets Total Return Bond Fund	2.32%	16.05%	7.41%	11.21%	-9.30%	-2.99%	7.84%	14.75%	-1.61%	11.00%
AMAPX Amana Participation Fund	0.16%	5.98%	3.77%	2.09%	-5.27%	0.49%	5.35%	6.61%	0.08%	2.36%

Correlation

The correlation between PFUMX and AMAPX is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.50
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.57
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.52
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2017	0.43

The correlation between PFUMX and AMAPX shifts across timeframes, from 0.43 (all time) to 0.57 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

PFUMX vs. AMAPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PFUMX

PFUMX Risk / Return Rank: 80
PFUMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
PFUMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
PFUMX Omega Ratio Rank: 95
PFUMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
PFUMX Martin Ratio Rank: 52

AMAPX

AMAPX Risk / Return Rank: 43
AMAPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
AMAPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
AMAPX Omega Ratio Rank: 83
AMAPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
AMAPX Martin Ratio Rank: 20

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PFUMX vs. AMAPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal Finisterre Emerging Markets Total Return Bond Fund (PFUMX) and Amana Participation Fund (AMAPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PFUMX	AMAPX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.46	1.84	+1.62
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	5.08	3.04	+2.04
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.80	1.57	+0.23
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.93	1.61	+1.31
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.44	5.22	+5.22
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PFUMX vs. AMAPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PFUMX Sharpe Ratio is 3.46, which is higher than the AMAPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PFUMX and AMAPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PFUMX	AMAPX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.46	1.84	+1.62
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.86	0.60	+0.26
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	1.10	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.21	1.10	+0.11

Drawdowns

PFUMX vs. AMAPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PFUMX drawdown since its inception was -21.27%, which is greater than AMAPX's maximum drawdown of -7.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFUMX and AMAPX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PFUMX	AMAPX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.27%	-7.75%	-13.52%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.45%	-2.51%	-1.94%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.79%	-2.64%	-4.15%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.27%	-7.75%	-13.52%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-7.75%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.09%	-0.71%	-0.38%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.29%	-1.56%	-1.73%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.25%	0.77%	+0.48%

Volatility

PFUMX vs. AMAPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Principal Finisterre Emerging Markets Total Return Bond Fund (PFUMX) is 0.90%, while Amana Participation Fund (AMAPX) has a volatility of 1.50%. This indicates that PFUMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMAPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PFUMX	AMAPX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.90%	1.50%	-0.60%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.13%	1.98%	+1.15%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.77%	2.20%	+1.57%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.15%	2.19%	+2.96%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.72%	2.01%	+2.71%

PFUMX vs. AMAPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PFUMX has a 0.84% expense ratio, which is higher than AMAPX's 0.78% expense ratio.

Dividends

PFUMX vs. AMAPX - Dividend Comparison

PFUMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.53%, more than AMAPX's 3.67% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
AMAPX Amana Participation Fund	3.67%	3.52%	3.15%	2.25%	1.30%	1.55%	1.95%	2.45%	2.62%	2.14%	2.14%
PFUMX Principal Finisterre Emerging Markets Total Return Bond Fund	5.53%	5.89%	7.26%	6.43%	7.99%	2.98%	4.29%	5.43%	3.84%	7.86%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PFUMX and AMAPX in my portfolio?

PFUMX and AMAPX have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PFUMX or AMAPX?

AMAPX has higher volatility (1.50%) compared to PFUMX (0.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PFUMX dropped -21.27% vs AMAPX's -7.75%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PFUMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.46 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.