PFUMX vs. AMAPX
Compare and contrast key facts about Principal Finisterre Emerging Markets Total Return Bond Fund (PFUMX) and Amana Participation Fund (AMAPX).
PFUMX is managed by Principal. It was launched on Jul 10, 2016. AMAPX is managed by Amana. It was launched on Sep 27, 2015.
Performance
PFUMX vs. AMAPX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PFUMX vs. AMAPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PFUMX Principal Finisterre Emerging Markets Total Return Bond Fund | -1.15% | 16.05% | 7.41% | 11.21% | -9.30% | -2.99% | 7.84% | 14.75% | -1.61% | 11.00% |
AMAPX Amana Participation Fund | -1.66% | 5.98% | 3.77% | 2.09% | -5.27% | 0.49% | 5.35% | 6.61% | 0.08% | 2.36% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PFUMX achieves a -1.15% return, which is significantly higher than AMAPX's -1.66% return.
PFUMX
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- -4.45%
- YTD
- -1.15%
- 6M
- 2.16%
- 1Y
- 11.62%
- 3Y*
- 10.04%
- 5Y*
- 4.26%
- 10Y*
- —
AMAPX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -2.51%
- YTD
- -1.66%
- 6M
- -0.66%
- 1Y
- 2.49%
- 3Y*
- 3.09%
- 5Y*
- 1.12%
- 10Y*
- 2.09%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PFUMX vs. AMAPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PFUMX has a 0.84% expense ratio, which is higher than AMAPX's 0.78% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PFUMX vs. AMAPX — Risk / Return Rank
PFUMX
AMAPX
PFUMX vs. AMAPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal Finisterre Emerging Markets Total Return Bond Fund (PFUMX) and Amana Participation Fund (AMAPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PFUMX | AMAPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.55 | 1.36 | +1.18 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.45 | 2.07 | +1.39 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.57 | 1.39 | +0.18 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.61 | 1.17 | +1.44 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.22 | 5.20 | +7.02 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PFUMX | AMAPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.55 | 1.36 | +1.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 | 0.55 | +0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.08 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.15 | 1.06 | +0.09 |
Correlation
The correlation between PFUMX and AMAPX is 0.42, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
PFUMX vs. AMAPX - Dividend Comparison
PFUMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.47%, more than AMAPX's 3.41% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PFUMX Principal Finisterre Emerging Markets Total Return Bond Fund | 5.47% | 5.89% | 7.26% | 6.43% | 7.99% | 2.98% | 4.29% | 5.43% | 3.84% | 7.86% | 0.00% |
AMAPX Amana Participation Fund | 3.41% | 3.52% | 3.15% | 2.25% | 1.30% | 1.55% | 1.95% | 2.45% | 2.62% | 2.14% | 2.14% |
Drawdowns
PFUMX vs. AMAPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PFUMX drawdown since its inception was -21.27%, which is greater than AMAPX's maximum drawdown of -7.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFUMX and AMAPX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PFUMX | AMAPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.27% | -7.75% | -13.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.45% | -2.51% | -1.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.27% | -7.75% | -13.52% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -7.75% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.45% | -2.51% | -1.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.32% | -1.57% | -1.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.95% | 0.56% | +0.39% |
Volatility
PFUMX vs. AMAPX - Volatility Comparison
Principal Finisterre Emerging Markets Total Return Bond Fund (PFUMX) has a higher volatility of 1.98% compared to Amana Participation Fund (AMAPX) at 0.70%. This indicates that PFUMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMAPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PFUMX | AMAPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.98% | 0.70% | +1.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.93% | 1.16% | +1.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.55% | 2.08% | +2.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.13% | 2.06% | +3.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.73% | 1.95% | +2.78% |