AMAPX vs. SPUS
Compare and contrast key facts about Amana Participation Fund (AMAPX) and SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF (SPUS).
AMAPX is managed by Amana. It was launched on Sep 27, 2015. SPUS is a passively managed fund by Toroso Investments that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Shariah Industry Exclusions Index. It was launched on Dec 18, 2019.
Performance
AMAPX vs. SPUS - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
AMAPX vs. SPUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMAPX Amana Participation Fund | -1.66% | 5.98% | 3.77% | 2.09% | -5.27% | 0.49% | 5.35% | 0.11% |
SPUS SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF | -5.55% | 19.77% | 26.49% | 34.24% | -22.76% | 35.92% | 25.68% | 0.81% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMAPX achieves a -1.66% return, which is significantly higher than SPUS's -5.55% return.
AMAPX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -2.51%
- YTD
- -1.66%
- 6M
- -0.66%
- 1Y
- 2.49%
- 3Y*
- 3.09%
- 5Y*
- 1.12%
- 10Y*
- 2.09%
SPUS
- 1D
- 3.24%
- 1M
- -5.39%
- YTD
- -5.55%
- 6M
- -2.24%
- 1Y
- 24.49%
- 3Y*
- 19.34%
- 5Y*
- 13.72%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
AMAPX vs. SPUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
AMAPX has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is higher than SPUS's 0.49% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
AMAPX vs. SPUS — Risk / Return Rank
AMAPX
SPUS
AMAPX vs. SPUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amana Participation Fund (AMAPX) and SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF (SPUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AMAPX | SPUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.36 | 1.18 | +0.19 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.07 | 1.80 | +0.27 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.26 | +0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.17 | 1.96 | -0.79 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.20 | 8.40 | -3.20 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AMAPX | SPUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.36 | 1.18 | +0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 | 0.72 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.08 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.06 | 0.75 | +0.30 |
Correlation
The correlation between AMAPX and SPUS is 0.10, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
AMAPX vs. SPUS - Dividend Comparison
AMAPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.41%, more than SPUS's 0.63% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMAPX Amana Participation Fund | 3.41% | 3.52% | 3.15% | 2.25% | 1.30% | 1.55% | 1.95% | 2.45% | 2.62% | 2.14% | 2.14% |
SPUS SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF | 0.63% | 0.60% | 0.70% | 0.87% | 1.21% | 1.15% | 1.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
AMAPX vs. SPUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMAPX drawdown since its inception was -7.75%, smaller than the maximum SPUS drawdown of -30.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMAPX and SPUS.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMAPX | SPUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.75% | -30.80% | +23.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.51% | -12.76% | +10.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -7.75% | -28.06% | +20.31% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -7.75% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.51% | -7.77% | +5.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.57% | -6.35% | +4.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.56% | 2.98% | -2.42% |
Volatility
AMAPX vs. SPUS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amana Participation Fund (AMAPX) is 0.70%, while SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF (SPUS) has a volatility of 6.04%. This indicates that AMAPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| AMAPX | SPUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.70% | 6.04% | -5.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.16% | 11.25% | -10.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.08% | 20.90% | -18.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.06% | 19.20% | -17.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.95% | 21.43% | -19.48% |