PFUMX vs. CMNWX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

PFUMX (Principal Finisterre Emerging Markets Total Return Bond Fund) and CMNWX (Principal Capital Appreciation Fund) are both mutual funds - PFUMX is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund managed by Principal, while CMNWX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Principal. Over the past 5 years, PFUMX returned 4.59%/yr vs 14.55%/yr for CMNWX. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PFUMX charges 0.84%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for CMNWX.

Performance

PFUMX vs. CMNWX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal Finisterre Emerging Markets Total Return Bond Fund (PFUMX) and Principal Capital Appreciation Fund (CMNWX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PFUMX achieves a 2.64% return, which is significantly lower than CMNWX's 9.31% return.

PFUMX

• 1D: -0.21%
• 1M: 1.02%
• YTD: 2.64%
• 6M: 3.06%
• 1Y: 12.33%
• 3Y*: 10.27%
• 5Y*: 4.59%
• 10Y*: —

CMNWX

• 1D: 1.04%
• 1M: 0.93%
• YTD: 9.31%
• 6M: 8.77%
• 1Y: 24.02%
• 3Y*: 21.81%
• 5Y*: 14.55%
• 10Y*: 15.51%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PFUMX vs. CMNWX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PFUMX Principal Finisterre Emerging Markets Total Return Bond Fund	2.64%	16.05%	7.41%	11.21%	-9.30%	-2.99%	7.84%	14.75%	-1.61%	11.00%
CMNWX Principal Capital Appreciation Fund	9.31%	13.27%	32.14%	25.01%	-16.37%	27.45%	18.36%	32.21%	-4.12%	20.64%

Correlation

The correlation between PFUMX and CMNWX is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.50
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.31
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.33
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017	0.31

The correlation between PFUMX and CMNWX shifts across timeframes, from 0.31 (all time) to 0.50 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

PFUMX vs. CMNWX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PFUMX

PFUMX Risk / Return Rank: 79
PFUMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
PFUMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
PFUMX Omega Ratio Rank: 95
PFUMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
PFUMX Martin Ratio Rank: 51

CMNWX

CMNWX Risk / Return Rank: 49
CMNWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
CMNWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
CMNWX Omega Ratio Rank: 42
CMNWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
CMNWX Martin Ratio Rank: 66

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PFUMX vs. CMNWX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal Finisterre Emerging Markets Total Return Bond Fund (PFUMX) and Principal Capital Appreciation Fund (CMNWX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PFUMX	CMNWX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.30	1.82	+1.48
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.84	2.49	+2.36
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.74	1.32	+0.42
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.81	2.66	+0.15
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.88	12.00	-2.12

PFUMX vs. CMNWX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PFUMX Sharpe Ratio is 3.30, which is higher than the CMNWX Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PFUMX and CMNWX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PFUMX vs. CMNWX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PFUMX drawdown since its inception was -21.27%, smaller than the maximum CMNWX drawdown of -50.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFUMX and CMNWX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PFUMX	CMNWX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.27%	-50.43%	+29.16%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.45%	-8.91%	+4.46%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.79%	-19.54%	+12.75%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.57%	-23.35%	+2.78%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-33.26%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.78%	-1.35%	+0.57%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.28%	-6.94%	+3.66%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.26%	1.97%	-0.71%

Volatility

PFUMX vs. CMNWX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Principal Finisterre Emerging Markets Total Return Bond Fund (PFUMX) is 0.92%, while Principal Capital Appreciation Fund (CMNWX) has a volatility of 4.91%. This indicates that PFUMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CMNWX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PFUMX	CMNWX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.92%	4.91%	-3.99%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.17%	10.28%	-7.11%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.79%	13.00%	-9.21%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.16%	16.90%	-11.74%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.71%	17.23%	-12.52%

PFUMX vs. CMNWX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PFUMX has a 0.84% expense ratio, which is higher than CMNWX's 0.80% expense ratio.

Dividends

PFUMX vs. CMNWX - Dividend Comparison

PFUMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.52%, less than CMNWX's 8.00% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CMNWX Principal Capital Appreciation Fund	8.00%	8.75%	10.03%	0.71%	0.69%	9.52%	5.33%	8.37%	46.60%	7.72%	10.32%	5.42%
PFUMX Principal Finisterre Emerging Markets Total Return Bond Fund	5.52%	5.89%	7.26%	6.43%	7.99%	2.98%	4.29%	5.43%	3.84%	7.86%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PFUMX and CMNWX in my portfolio?

PFUMX and CMNWX have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PFUMX or CMNWX?

CMNWX has higher volatility (4.91%) compared to PFUMX (0.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PFUMX dropped -21.27% vs CMNWX's -50.43%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PFUMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.30 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.